Literature DB >> 22223252

ROC curve inference for best linear combination of two biomarkers subject to limits of detection.

Neil J Perkins1, Enrique F Schisterman, Albert Vexler.   

Abstract

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is a tool commonly used to evaluate biomarker utility in clinical diagnosis of disease. Often, multiple biomarkers are developed to evaluate the discrimination for the same outcome. Levels of multiple biomarkers can be combined via best linear combination (BLC) such that their overall discriminatory ability is greater than any of them individually. Biomarker measurements frequently have undetectable levels below a detection limit sometimes denoted as limit of detection (LOD). Ignoring observations below the LOD or substituting some replacement value as a method of correction has been shown to lead to negatively biased estimates of the area under the ROC curve for some distributions of single biomarkers. In this paper, we develop asymptotically unbiased estimators, via the maximum likelihood technique, of the area under the ROC curve of BLC of two bivariate normally distributed biomarkers affected by LODs. We also propose confidence intervals for this area under curve. Point and confidence interval estimates are scrutinized by simulation study, recording bias and root mean square error and coverage probability, respectively. An example using polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) levels to classify women with and without endometriosis illustrates the potential benefits of our methods.
Copyright © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22223252      PMCID: PMC4159257          DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201000083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  10 in total

1.  Maximum likelihood inference for left-censored HIV RNA data.

Authors:  H S Lynn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Receiver operating characteristic curve inference from a sample with a limit of detection.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Comparing the areas under two correlated ROC curves: parametric and non-parametric approaches.

Authors:  Katy Molodianovitch; David Faraggi; Benjamin Reiser
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Combining predictors for classification using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Tianxi Cai; Gary Longton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Confidence intervals for the generalized ROC criterion.

Authors:  B Reiser; D Faraggi
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Relative concentrations of organochlorines in adipose tissue and serum among reproductive age women.

Authors:  Brian W Whitcomb; Enrique F Schisterman; Germaine M Buck; John M Weiner; Hebe Greizerstein; Paul J Kostyniak
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.860

7.  Correlating two viral load assays with known detection limits.

Authors:  R H Lyles; J K Williams; R Chuachoowong
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Environmental PCB exposure and risk of endometriosis.

Authors:  G M Buck Louis; J M Weiner; B W Whitcomb; R Sperrazza; E F Schisterman; D T Lobdell; K Crickard; H Greizerstein; P J Kostyniak
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves.

Authors:  Lorenzo L Pesce; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Generalized ROC curve inference for a biomarker subject to a limit of detection and measurement error.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

  10 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Cutoffs for Nutritional Biomarkers.

Authors:  Ramkripa Raghavan; Fayrouz Sakr Ashour; Regan Bailey
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Detection of cancer biomarkers in serum using a hybrid mechanical and optoplasmonic nanosensor.

Authors:  P M Kosaka; V Pini; J J Ruz; R A da Silva; M U González; D Ramos; M Calleja; J Tamayo
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  A Model-Based Approach to Detection Limits in Studying Environmental Exposures and Human Fecundity.

Authors:  Sungduk Kim; Zhen Chen; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2019-06-07

4.  Estimation of smooth ROC curves for biomarkers with limits of detection.

Authors:  Leonidas E Bantis; Qingxiang Yan; John V Tsimikas; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Multivariate normally distributed biomarkers subject to limits of detection and receiver operating characteristic curve inference.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Linear combination methods to improve diagnostic/prognostic accuracy on future observations.

Authors:  Le Kang; Aiyi Liu; Lili Tian
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  A family of estimators to diagnostic accuracy when candidate tests are subject to detection limits-Application to diagnosing early stage Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Chengjie Xiong; Jingqin Luo; Folasade Agboola; Elizabeth Grant; John C Morris
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.494

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.