Literature DB >> 19340817

Generalized ROC curve inference for a biomarker subject to a limit of detection and measurement error.

Neil J Perkins1, Enrique F Schisterman, Albert Vexler.   

Abstract

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is a tool commonly used to evaluate biomarker utility in clinical diagnosis of disease, especially during biomarker development research. Emerging biomarkers are often measured with random measurement error and subject to limits of detection that hinder their potential utility or mask an ability to discriminate by negatively biasing the estimates of ROC curves and subsequent area under the curve. Methods have been developed to correct the ROC curve for each of these types of sources of bias but here we develop a method by which the ROC curve is corrected for both simultaneously through replicate measures and maximum likelihood. Our method is evaluated via simulation study and applied to two potential discriminators of women with and without preeclampsia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19340817      PMCID: PMC2754222          DOI: 10.1002/sim.3575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  Maximum likelihood inference for left-censored HIV RNA data.

Authors:  H S Lynn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The effect of random measurement error on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Authors:  D Faraggi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Statistical inference for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of random measurement error.

Authors:  E F Schisterman; D Faraggi; B Reiser; M Trevisan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  The Youden Index and the optimal cut-point corrected for measurement error.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  Receiver operating characteristic curve inference from a sample with a limit of detection.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Iterative maximum-likelihood estimation of the parameters of normal populations from singly and doubly censored samples.

Authors:  H L Harter; A H Moore
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  Correlating two viral load assays with known detection limits.

Authors:  R H Lyles; J K Williams; R Chuachoowong
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Richard J Levine; Sharon E Maynard; Cong Qian; Kee-Hak Lim; Lucinda J England; Kai F Yu; Enrique F Schisterman; Ravi Thadhani; Benjamin P Sachs; Franklin H Epstein; Baha M Sibai; Vikas P Sukhatme; S Ananth Karumanchi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Maximum likelihood ratio tests for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Aiyi Liu; Ekaterina Eliseeva; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 1.701

  9 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  The use of mass spectrometry for analysing metabolite biomarkers in epidemiology: methodological and statistical considerations for application to large numbers of biological samples.

Authors:  Mads V Lind; Otto I Savolainen; Alastair B Ross
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Evaluation of Cerebrospinal Fluid Assay Variability in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Matthew T White; Leslie M Shaw; Sharon X Xie
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.472

3.  A semiparametric method for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection.

Authors:  Lixuan Yin; Guoqing Diao; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  ROC curve inference for best linear combination of two biomarkers subject to limits of detection.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  A nonlinear measurement error model and its application to describing the dependency of health outcomes on dietary intake.

Authors:  B Curley
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 1.416

6.  Linear combination methods to improve diagnostic/prognostic accuracy on future observations.

Authors:  Le Kang; Aiyi Liu; Lili Tian
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  A maximum Likelihood Approach to Analyzing Incomplete Longitudinal Data in Mammary Tumor Development Experiments with Mice.

Authors:  Jihnhee Yu; Albert Vexler; Alan D Hutson
Journal:  Sri Lankan J Appl Stat       Date:  2013-01-09

8.  Adjustment for measurement error in evaluating diagnostic biomarkers by using an internal reliability sample.

Authors:  Matthew T White; Sharon X Xie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.373

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.