Literature DB >> 23747152

Multivariate normally distributed biomarkers subject to limits of detection and receiver operating characteristic curve inference.

Neil J Perkins1, Enrique F Schisterman, Albert Vexler.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Biomarkers are of ever-increasing importance to clinical practice and epidemiologic research. Multiple biomarkers are often measured per patient. Measurement of true biomarker levels is limited by laboratory precision, specifically measuring relatively low, or high, biomarker levels resulting in undetectable levels below, or above, a limit of detection (LOD). Ignoring these missing observations or replacing them with a constant are methods commonly used although they have been shown to lead to biased estimates of several parameters of interest, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and regression coefficients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed asymptotically consistent, efficient estimators, via maximum likelihood techniques, for the mean vector and covariance matrix of multivariate normally distributed biomarkers affected by LOD. We also developed an approximation for the Fisher information and covariance matrix for our maximum likelihood estimations (MLEs). We apply these results to an ROC curve setting, generating an MLE for the area under the curve for the best linear combination of multiple biomarkers and accompanying confidence interval.
RESULTS: Point and confidence interval estimates are scrutinized by simulation study, with bias and root mean square error and coverage probability, respectively, displaying behavior consistent with MLEs. An example using three polychlorinated biphenyls to classify women with and without endometriosis illustrates how the underlying distribution of multiple biomarkers with LOD can be assessed and display increased discriminatory ability over naïve methods.
CONCLUSIONS: Properly addressing LODs can lead to optimal biomarker combinations with increased discriminatory ability that may have been ignored because of measurement obstacles. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23747152      PMCID: PMC4160911          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  15 in total

1.  Continuous versus categorical data for ROC analysis: some quantitative considerations.

Authors:  R F Wagner; S V Beiden; C E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Opening the black box of biomarker measurement error.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Roderick J Little
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Receiver operating characteristic curve inference from a sample with a limit of detection.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Comparing the areas under two correlated ROC curves: parametric and non-parametric approaches.

Authors:  Katy Molodianovitch; David Faraggi; Benjamin Reiser
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Procedures for determination of detection limits: application to high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of fat-soluble vitamins in human serum.

Authors:  Richard W Browne; Brian W Whitcomb
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  On the convexity of ROC curves estimated from radiological test results.

Authors:  Lorenzo L Pesce; Charles E Metz; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Environmental PCB exposure and risk of endometriosis.

Authors:  G M Buck Louis; J M Weiner; B W Whitcomb; R Sperrazza; E F Schisterman; D T Lobdell; K Crickard; H Greizerstein; P J Kostyniak
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  An analytic expression for the binormal partial area under the ROC curve.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Maximum likelihood ratio tests for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Aiyi Liu; Ekaterina Eliseeva; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  3 in total

1.  Estimation of smooth ROC curves for biomarkers with limits of detection.

Authors:  Leonidas E Bantis; Qingxiang Yan; John V Tsimikas; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Confidence Interval Estimation of the Youden index and corresponding cut-point for a combination of biomarkers under normality.

Authors:  Kristopher Attwood; Lili Tian
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 0.863

3.  A family of estimators to diagnostic accuracy when candidate tests are subject to detection limits-Application to diagnosing early stage Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Chengjie Xiong; Jingqin Luo; Folasade Agboola; Elizabeth Grant; John C Morris
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.494

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.