Literature DB >> 22221624

Australian mental health consumers' priorities for research: qualitative findings from the SCOPE for Research project.

Michelle A Banfield1, Lisa J Barney, Kathleen M Griffiths, Helen M Christensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is growing acceptance of the importance of the consumer viewpoint in mental health research. Previous studies have identified differences in research priorities between researchers and mental health consumers in Australia defined broadly. However, little is known about the research priorities of consumers with specific mental health conditions.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore Australian mental health consumers' priorities for depression and bipolar disorder research.
DESIGN: Focus groups with consumers and individual telephone interviews with consumer advocates. Participants were asked to discuss the topics they believed were priorities for depression or bipolar disorder research. Transcripts were thematically analysed using NVivo 7. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Ten people with depression and 19 with bipolar disorder participated in face-to-face focus groups held in three Australian capital cities. Five participants with each disorder participated in online focus groups. Five Australian consumer advocates with experience of depression and six with experience of bipolar disorder were individually interviewed by telephone.
RESULTS: Participants raised a broad variety of topics for research. The most salient themes included the need for research on medication, and lifestyle and psychosocial influences on depression and bipolar disorder.
CONCLUSIONS: Participants' priorities reflect an interest in a holistic approach to mental health research that examines the influences of everyday life and psychosocial influences both on the development and on the management of these disorders. Their focus was on research that explores individualized care and the active role that consumers can play in their own care and recovery.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bipolar disorder; consumer involvement; depression; research priorities

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22221624      PMCID: PMC5060732          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00763.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  8 in total

1.  Priority setting in public health and health services research.

Authors:  N Carson; Z Ansari; W Hart
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  User-led research and evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Alison Faulkner; Phil Thomas
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 3.  Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda.

Authors:  Jonathan Boote; Rosemary Telford; Cindy Cooper
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Mental and neurological health research priorities setting in developing countries.

Authors:  Sudhir Khandelwal; Gilbert Avodé; Florence Baingana; Bernado Conde; Marcelo Cruz; Parameshvara Deva; Michel Dumas; Walter Gulbinat; Carmen Lopez; John Mayeya; Malik H Mubbashar; Ahmad Mohit; David Ndeti; Dainius Puras; Khalid Saeed; Klaas Schilder; Donald Silberberg; Toma Tomov; Clare Townsend; Valentina Iemmi; Rachel Jenkins
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Research priorities in mental health.

Authors:  D Campbell
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.356

6.  Do different stakeholder groups share mental health research priorities? A four-arm Delphi study.

Authors:  Christabel Owens; Ann Ley; Peter Aitken
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Mental health research priorities in low- and middle-income countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean.

Authors:  P Sharan; C Gallo; O Gureje; E Lamberte; J J Mari; G Mazzotti; V Patel; L Swartz; S Olifson; I Levav; A de Francisco; S Saxena
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  Research priorities in mental health, Part 2: an evaluationof the current research effort against stakeholders' priorities.

Authors:  Kathleen M Griffiths; Anthony F Jorm; Helen Christensen; Jo Medway; Keith B G Dear
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.744

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Perceived healthcare provider reactions to patient and caregiver use of online health communities.

Authors:  Douglas J Rupert; Rebecca R Moultrie; Jennifer Gard Read; Jacqueline B Amoozegar; Alexandra S Bornkessel; Amie C O'Donoghue; Helen W Sullivan
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-05-29

2.  Peer-Generated Health Information: The Role of Online Communities in Patient and Caregiver Health Decisions.

Authors:  Douglas J Rupert; Jennifer Gard Read; Jacqueline B Amoozegar; Rebecca R Moultrie; Olivia M Taylor; Amie C O'Donoghue; Helen W Sullivan
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-11-02

3.  Harnessing the potential of community-based participatory research approaches in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Erin E Michalak; Steven Jones; Fiona Lobban; Guillermo Perez Algorta; Steven J Barnes; Lesley Berk; Michael Berk; Rachelle Hole; Sara Lapsley; Victoria Maxwell; Roumen Milev; John McManamy; Greg Murray; Mauricio Tohen; Samson Tse; Manuel Sanchez de Carmona; Sheri L Johnson
Journal:  Int J Bipolar Disord       Date:  2016-02-09

4.  Systemic challenges in bipolar disorder management: A patient-centered approach.

Authors:  Anastasiya Nestsiarovich; Nathaniel G Hurwitz; Stuart J Nelson; Annette S Crisanti; Berit Kerner; Matt J Kuntz; Alicia N Smith; Emma Volesky; Quentin L Schroeter; Jason L DeShaw; S Stanley Young; Robert L Obenchain; Ronald L Krall; Kimmie Jordan; Jan Fawcett; Mauricio Tohen; Douglas J Perkins; Christophe G Lambert
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.744

5.  Virtual Versus In-Person Focus Groups: Comparison of Costs, Recruitment, and Participant Logistics.

Authors:  Douglas J Rupert; Jon A Poehlman; Jennifer J Hayes; Sarah E Ray; Rebecca R Moultrie
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Missed opportunities for impact in patient and carer involvement: a mixed methods case study of research priority setting.

Authors:  R Snow; J C Crocker; S Crowe
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2015-08-04

Review 7.  Priorities of patients, caregivers and health-care professionals for health research - A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Levelink; Mona Voigt-Barbarowicz; Anna Levke Brütt
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Virtual World Café Method for Identifying Mental Health Research Priorities: Methodological Case Study.

Authors:  Michelle Banfield; Amelia Gulliver; Alyssa R Morse
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  User involvement in the implementation of clinical guidelines for common mental health disorders: a review and compilation of strategies and resources.

Authors:  Eliana M Moreno; Juan Antonio Moriana
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-08-09

10.  Comparison of a co-produced mental health service to traditional services: A co-produced mixed-methods cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Raffaella Pocobello; Tarek El Sehity; Luca Negrogno; Carlo Minervini; Maddalena Guida; Cosimo Venerito
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.