Literature DB >> 27805496

Peer-Generated Health Information: The Role of Online Communities in Patient and Caregiver Health Decisions.

Douglas J Rupert1, Jennifer Gard Read1, Jacqueline B Amoozegar2, Rebecca R Moultrie1, Olivia M Taylor1, Amie C O'Donoghue3, Helen W Sullivan3.   

Abstract

Individuals increasingly access peer-generated health information (PGHI) through social media, especially online health communities (OHCs). Previous research has documented PGHI topics, credibility assessment strategies, and PGHI's connection with well-being. However, there is limited evidence on where, when, and why individuals seek PGHI and how they use PGHI in health decisions. We conducted in-person and online focus groups with verified OHC members (N = 89)-representing 50 different medical conditions and 77 OHCs-to explore these topics. Two researchers independently coded transcripts with NVivo 9.2 and thematically analyzed responses. Most individuals accidentally discovered PGHI during Web searches rather than intentionally seeking it. Individuals valued PGHI primarily as an alternative information source about treatment options, self-care activities, and health care provider questions rather than a source of emotional support, and they acknowledged PGHI's limitation as anecdotal evidence. Individuals used PGHI as a springboard for additional research and patient-provider discussions, ultimately making treatment decisions alongside providers. These findings suggest that individuals use PGHI in much the same way they use traditional online health information and that PGHI facilitates, rather than obstructs, shared decision making with health care providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27805496      PMCID: PMC7315436          DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1237592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  41 in total

1.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish.

Authors:  G K Berland; M N Elliott; L S Morales; J I Algazy; R L Kravitz; M S Broder; D E Kanouse; J A Muñoz; J A Puyol; M Lara; K E Watkins; H Yang; E A McGlynn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Health orientation and disease state as predictors of online health support group use.

Authors:  Mohan J Dutta; Hairong Feng
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2007

3.  Health information, credibility, homophily, and influence via the Internet: Web sites versus discussion groups.

Authors:  Zuoming Wang; Joseph B Walther; Suzanne Pingree; Robert P Hawkins
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2008-07

4.  Social networks and physical activity behaviors among cancer survivors: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Bang Hyun Kim; Sherrie F Wallington; Kepher H Makambi; Lucile L Adams-Campbell
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-05-15

Review 5.  Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship.

Authors:  Miriam McMullan
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-01-06

6.  Perceived benefits of sharing health data between people with epilepsy on an online platform.

Authors:  Paul Wicks; Dorothy L Keininger; Michael P Massagli; Christine de la Loge; Catherine Brownstein; Jouko Isojärvi; James Heywood
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.937

Review 7.  A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions.

Authors:  Cath Jackson; Francine M Cheater; Innes Reid
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another's data.

Authors:  Jeana H Frost; Michael P Massagli
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Utilization of smoking cessation informational, interactive, and online community resources as predictors of abstinence: cohort study.

Authors:  Lawrence C An; Barbara A Schillo; Jessie E Saul; Ann H Wendling; Colleen M Klatt; Carla J Berg; Jasjit S Ahulwalia; Annette M Kavanaugh; Matthew Christenson; Michael G Luxenberg
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology.

Authors:  Kiek Tates; Marieke Zwaanswijk; Roel Otten; Sandra van Dulmen; Peter M Hoogerbrugge; Willem A Kamps; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  7 in total

1.  Understanding emerging forms of cannabis use through an online cannabis community: An analysis of relative post volume and subjective highness ratings.

Authors:  Meredith C Meacham; Michael J Paul; Danielle E Ramo
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 2.  Social Media Use for Health Purposes: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Junhan Chen; Yuan Wang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Lower urinary tract symptoms in men: challenges to early hospital presentation in a resource-poor health system.

Authors:  Ikenna I Nnabugwu; Ijeoma L Okoronkwo; Chinwe A Nnabugwu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Patients' Convergence of Mass and Interpersonal Communication on an Online Forum: Hybrid Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Remco Sanders; Theo B Araujo; Rens Vliegenthart; Mies C van Eenbergen; Julia C M van Weert; Annemiek J Linn
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Experiences, Motivations, and Perceived Impact of Participation in a Facebook-Based Support Group for Caregivers of Children and Youth With Complex Care Needs: Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Katherine Jennifer Kelly; Shelley Doucet; Alison Luke; Rima Azar; William Montelpare
Journal:  JMIR Pediatr Parent       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 6.  Leveraging the timing and frequency of patient decision aids in longitudinal shared decision-making: A narrative review and applied model.

Authors:  Lara R LoBrutto; Gemmae Fix; Renda S Wiener; Amy M Linsky
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  The Abortion Web Ecosystem: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Trustworthiness and Bias.

Authors:  Leo Han; Emily R Boniface; Lisa Yin Han; Jonathan Albright; Nora Doty; Blair G Darney
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.