Literature DB >> 22215509

Glucose meter inaccuracy and the impact on the care of patients.

Richard Hellman1.   

Abstract

Blood glucose testing utilizing point-of-care (POC) glucose meters has become increasingly common--in hospital settings, in outpatient areas, and in the self-care of patients. It is rightly considered an essential tool for the management of diabetes. But many who rely on these meters are unaware of the pitfalls in their use and do not realize that there are settings where misleading results obtained by POC glucose meters may alter clinical decisions in the care of persons with diabetes and in some cases have caused catastrophic errors in care, even deaths. Their use in critical care settings is of great concern because many of the factors that increase the risk of inaccuracy of the POC glucose meters exist in critical care settings. Unfortunately, many clinicians are still uncritically accepting data from the POC glucose meters, to the potential detriment of the care of the patients. To improve the quality of care of those with diabetes, we need to establish better standards for the evaluation of POC glucose meters, encourage wider use of technologies that have improved the accuracy and precision of the meters, and adopt clear rules, particularly in inpatient settings, as to when to avoid using POC glucose meters and also when to verify their results before accepting the results of the POC glucose measurement. Such strategies are essential if we are to use these meters successfully.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22215509     DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev        ISSN: 1520-7552            Impact factor:   4.876


  6 in total

1.  A new test strip technology platform for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  Robert Bernstein; Joan Lee Parkes; Amy Goldy; Daniel Brown; Bern Harrison; Amy Chu; Brian K Pflug; David A Simmons; Scott Pardo; Timothy S Bailey
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

2.  Impact of Two Different Reference Measurement Procedures on Apparent System Accuracy of 18 CE-Marked Current-Generation Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Annette Baumstark; Nina Jendrike; Jochen Mende; Sebastian Schauer; Manuela Link; Stefan Pleus; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-19

Review 3.  Glycemic management in medical and surgical patients in the non-ICU setting.

Authors:  Kara Hawkins; Amy C Donihi; Mary T Korytkowski
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Impact of glucose measurement processing delays on clinical accuracy and relevance.

Authors:  Sujit R Jangam; Gary Hayter; Timothy C Dunn
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-01

5.  Mean Absolute Relative Difference of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems and Relationship to ISO 15197.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Jochen Mende; Stefan Pleus; Delia Waldenmaier; Annette Baumstark; Nina Jendrike; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-24

6.  Accuracy Evaluation of CONTOUR(®)PLUS Compared With Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Authors:  Nancy Dunne; Maria T Viggiani; Scott Pardo; Cynthia Robinson; Joan Lee Parkes
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.945

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.