Literature DB >> 22007046

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Penny F Whiting1, Anne W S Rutjes, Marie E Westwood, Susan Mallett, Jonathan J Deeks, Johannes B Reitsma, Mariska M G Leeflang, Jonathan A C Sterne, Patrick M M Bossuyt.   

Abstract

In 2003, the QUADAS tool for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies was developed. Experience, anecdotal reports, and feedback suggested areas for improvement; therefore, QUADAS-2 was developed. This tool comprises 4 domains: patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Each domain is assessed in terms of risk of bias, and the first 3 domains are also assessed in terms of concerns regarding applicability. Signalling questions are included to help judge risk of bias. The QUADAS-2 tool is applied in 4 phases: summarize the review question, tailor the tool and produce review-specific guidance, construct a flow diagram for the primary study, and judge bias and applicability. This tool will allow for more transparent rating of bias and applicability of primary diagnostic accuracy studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22007046     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  2000 in total

Review 1.  Circulating MicroRNA as Potential Source for Neurodegenerative Diseases Biomarkers.

Authors:  Ying Zi; Zhongmin Yin; Weizhong Xiao; Xinwei Liu; Zhixiang Gao; Li Jiao; Lianfu Deng
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 2.  Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-gating in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Kwan-Hoong Ng
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Triage tools for detecting cervical spine injury in pediatric trauma patients.

Authors:  Annelie Slaar; M M Fockens; Junfeng Wang; Mario Maas; David J Wilson; J Carel Goslings; Niels Wl Schep; Rick R van Rijn
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-07

4.  Can high-risk CT features suggest local recurrence after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tae-Hyung Kim; Sungmin Woo; Darragh F Halpenny; Yeon Joo Kim; Soon Ho Yoon; Chong Hyun Suh
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 5.  Circulating miR-21 as a Potential Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mario Dioguardi; Giorgia Apollonia Caloro; Luigi Laino; Mario Alovisi; Diego Sovereto; Vito Crincoli; Riccardo Aiuto; Erminia Coccia; Giuseppe Troiano; Lorenzo Lo Muzio
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT compared with abdominal radiography in non-traumatic acute abdominal pain: prospective study and systematic review.

Authors:  Muhammed Alshamari; Eva Norrman; Mats Geijer; Kjell Jansson; Håkan Geijer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Value of abdominal ultrasound in management of necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maarten Janssen Lok; Hiromu Miyake; Alison Hock; Alan Daneman; Agostino Pierro; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  State-of-the-art of FAPI-PET imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martina Sollini; Margarita Kirienko; Fabrizia Gelardi; Francesco Fiz; Noemi Gozzi; Arturo Chiti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Utility of Liquid Biopsy Analysis in Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Determination of Prognosis, and Disease Monitoring: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vincent L Chen; Dabo Xu; Max S Wicha; Anna S Lok; Neehar D Parikh
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 10.  Diagnostic accuracy of level 3 portable sleep tests versus level 1 polysomnography for sleep-disordered breathing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed El Shayeb; Leigh-Ann Topfer; Tania Stafinski; Lawrence Pawluk; Devidas Menon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.