Literature DB >> 12072766

Distal femur resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction: a long-term followup study.

Jacob Bickels1, James C Wittig, Yehuda Kollender, Robert M Henshaw, Kristen L Kellar-Graney, Issac Meller, Martin M Malawer.   

Abstract

The distal femur is a common site for primary and metastatic bone tumors and therefore, it is a frequent site in which limb-sparing surgery is done. Between 1980 and 1998, the authors treated 110 consecutive patients who had distal femur resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction. There were 61 males and 49 females who ranged in age from 10 to 80 years. Diagnoses included 99 malignant tumors of bone, nine benign-aggressive lesions, and two nonneoplastic conditions that had caused massive bone loss and articular surface destruction. Reconstruction was done with 73 modular prostheses, 27 custom-made prostheses, and 10 expandable prostheses. Twenty-six gastrocnemius flaps were used for soft tissue reconstruction. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Function was estimated to be good or excellent in 94 patients (85.4%), moderate in nine patients (8.2%), and poor in seven patients (6.4%). Complications included six deep wound infections (5.4%), six aseptic loosenings (5.4%), six prosthetic polyethylene component failures (5.4%), and local recurrence in five of 93 patients (5.4%) who had a primary bone sarcoma. The limb salvage rate was 96%. Distal femur endoprosthetic reconstruction is a safe and reliable technique of functional limb sparing that provides good function and local tumor control in most patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12072766     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200207000-00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  48 in total

1.  Surgical technique: Methods for removing a Compress® compliant prestress implant.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Abrams; Varun K Gajendran; David G Mohler; Raffi S Avedian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparison of gait parameters in distal femoral replacement using a metallic endoprosthesis versus allograft reconstruction.

Authors:  Fahad AlGheshyan; Moataz Eltoukhy; Khaled Zakaria; Harry Thomas Temple; Shihab Asfour
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-02-23

3.  CORR Insights®: What Are the Long-term Results of MUTARS® Modular Endoprostheses for Reconstruction of Tumor Resection of the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia?

Authors:  Hannes A Rüdiger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Early distal femoral endoprosthetic survival: cemented stems versus the Compress implant.

Authors:  A A Bhangu; M J Kramer; R J Grimer; R J O'Donnell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Causes and Frequencies of Reoperations After Endoprosthetic Reconstructions for Extremity Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Patrick Thornley; Matias Vicente; Austin MacDonald; Nathan Evaniew; Michelle Ghert; Roberto Velez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Early equivalence of uncemented press-fit and Compress femoral fixation.

Authors:  German L Farfalli; Patrick J Boland; Carol D Morris; Edward A Athanasian; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Radiographic assessment of distal femur cemented stems in tumor endoprostheses.

Authors:  R E Turcotte; N A Stavropoulos; J Toreson; M Alsultan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-28

8.  Compress periprosthetic fractures: interface stability and ease of revision.

Authors:  Wakenda K Tyler; John H Healey; Carol D Morris; Patrick J Boland; Richard J O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Compressive osseointegration of tibial implants in primary cancer reconstruction.

Authors:  Richard J O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Cemented distal femoral endoprostheses for musculoskeletal tumor: improved survival of modular versus custom implants.

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; J Michael Kabo; Fritz C Eilber; Frederick R Eilber; Jeffrey J Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.