Literature DB >> 22186998

Pharmacogenetic warfarin dose refinements remain significantly influenced by genetic factors after one week of therapy.

Benjamin D Horne1, Petra A Lenzini, Mia Wadelius, Andrea L Jorgensen, Stephen E Kimmel, Paul M Ridker, Niclas Eriksson, Jeffrey L Anderson, Munir Pirmohamed, Nita A Limdi, Robert C Pendleton, Gwendolyn A McMillin, James K Burmester, Daniel Kurnik, C Michael Stein, Michael D Caldwell, Charles S Eby, Anders Rane, Jonatan D Lindh, Jae-Gook Shin, Ho-Sook Kim, Pantep Angchaisuksiri, Robert J Glynn, Kathryn E Kronquist, John F Carlquist, Gloria R Grice, Robert L Barrack, Juan Li, Brian F Gage.   

Abstract

By guiding initial warfarin dose, pharmacogenetic (PGx) algorithms may improve the safety of warfarin initiation. However, once international normalised ratio (INR) response is known, the contribution of PGx to dose refinements is uncertain. This study sought to develop and validate clinical and PGx dosing algorithms for warfarin dose refinement on days 6-11 after therapy initiation. An international sample of 2,022 patients at 13 medical centres on three continents provided clinical, INR, and genetic data at treatment days 6-11 to predict therapeutic warfarin dose. Independent derivation and retrospective validation samples were composed by randomly dividing the population (80%/20%). Prior warfarin doses were weighted by their expected effect on S-warfarin concentrations using an exponential-decay pharmacokinetic model. The INR divided by that "effective" dose constituted a treatment response index . Treatment response index, age, amiodarone, body surface area, warfarin indication, and target INR were associated with dose in the derivation sample. A clinical algorithm based on these factors was remarkably accurate: in the retrospective validation cohort its R(2) was 61.2% and median absolute error (MAE) was 5.0 mg/week. Accuracy and safety was confirmed in a prospective cohort (N=43). CYP2C9 variants and VKORC1-1639 G→A were significant dose predictors in both the derivation and validation samples. In the retrospective validation cohort, the PGx algorithm had: R(2)= 69.1% (p<0.05 vs. clinical algorithm), MAE= 4.7 mg/week. In conclusion, a pharmacogenetic warfarin dose-refinement algorithm based on clinical, INR, and genetic factors can explain at least 69.1% of therapeutic warfarin dose variability after about one week of therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22186998      PMCID: PMC3292349          DOI: 10.1160/TH11-06-0388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  41 in total

1.  Integration of genetic, clinical, and INR data to refine warfarin dosing.

Authors:  P Lenzini; M Wadelius; S Kimmel; J L Anderson; A L Jorgensen; M Pirmohamed; M D Caldwell; N Limdi; J K Burmester; M B Dowd; P Angchaisuksiri; A R Bass; J Chen; N Eriksson; A Rane; J D Lindh; J F Carlquist; B D Horne; G Grice; P E Milligan; C Eby; J Shin; H Kim; D Kurnik; C M Stein; G McMillin; R C Pendleton; R L Berg; P Deloukas; B F Gage
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Prospective evaluation of a pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin loading and maintenance dose regimen for initiation of therapy.

Authors:  Inna Y Gong; Rommel G Tirona; Ute I Schwarz; Natalie Crown; George K Dresser; Samantha Larue; Nicole Langlois; Alejandro Lazo-Langner; Guangyong Zou; Dan M Roden; C Michael Stein; Marc Rodger; Marc Carrier; Melissa Forgie; Philip S Wells; Richard B Kim
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Warfarin genotyping reduces hospitalization rates results from the MM-WES (Medco-Mayo Warfarin Effectiveness study).

Authors:  Robert S Epstein; Thomas P Moyer; Ronald E Aubert; Dennis J O Kane; Fang Xia; Robert R Verbrugge; Brian F Gage; J Russell Teagarden
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Warfarin pharmacogenetics: a single VKORC1 polymorphism is predictive of dose across 3 racial groups.

Authors:  Nita A Limdi; Mia Wadelius; Larisa Cavallari; Niclas Eriksson; Dana C Crawford; Ming-Ta M Lee; Chien-Hsiun Chen; Alison Motsinger-Reif; Hersh Sagreiya; Nianjun Liu; Alan H B Wu; Brian F Gage; Andrea Jorgensen; Munir Pirmohamed; Jae-Gook Shin; Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz; Stephen E Kimmel; Julie A Johnson; Teri E Klein; Michael J Wagner
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Predicting the warfarin maintenance dose in elderly inpatients at treatment initiation: accuracy of dosing algorithms incorporating or not VKORC1/CYP2C9 genotypes.

Authors:  C Moreau; E Pautas; I Gouin-Thibault; J-L Golmard; I Mahé; C Mulot; M-A Loriot; V Siguret
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation: a Canadian payer perspective.

Authors:  S V Sorensen; A R Kansal; S Connolly; S Peng; J Linnehan; C Bradley-Kennedy; J M Plumb
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Ability of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 to predict therapeutic warfarin dose during the initial weeks of therapy.

Authors:  N S Ferder; C S Eby; E Deych; J K Harris; P M Ridker; P E Milligan; S Z Goldhaber; C R King; T Giri; H L McLeod; R J Glynn; B F Gage
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 5.824

8.  Interactive modeling for ongoing utility of pharmacogenetic diagnostic testing: application for warfarin therapy.

Authors:  Mark W Linder; Marjorie Bon Homme; Kristen K Reynolds; Brian F Gage; Charles Eby; Natalia Silvestrov; Roland Valdes
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Genetic and clinical predictors of warfarin dose requirements in African Americans.

Authors:  L H Cavallari; T Y Langaee; K M Momary; N L Shapiro; E A Nutescu; W A Coty; M A G Viana; S R Patel; J A Johnson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Lower versus standard intensity oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) in elderly warfarin-experienced patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  V Pengo; U Cucchini; G Denas; B L Davidson; F Marzot; S P Jose; S Iliceto
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  28 in total

1.  Improved accuracy of anticoagulant dose prediction using a pharmacogenetic and artificial neural network-based method.

Authors:  Hussain A Isma'eel; George E Sakr; Robert H Habib; Mohamad Musbah Almedawar; Nathalie K Zgheib; Imad H Elhajj
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  The future of warfarin pharmacogenetics in under-represented minority groups.

Authors:  Larisa H Cavallari; Minoli A Perera
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2012-07

3.  Development of a genetic marker set to diagnose aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease in a genome-wide association study.

Authors:  H S Chang; S W Shin; T H Lee; D J Bae; J S Park; Y H Kim; S T Uh; B W Choi; M K Kim; I S Choi; B L Park; H D Shin; C S Park
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 4.  Pharmacogenetics of warfarin dosing in patients of African and European ancestry.

Authors:  Aditi Shendre; Chrisly Dillon; Nita A Limdi
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Genotype-Guided vs Standard Dosing of Warfarin.

Authors:  Khagendra Dahal; Sharan P Sharma; Erik Fung; Juyong Lee; Jason H Moore; John N Unterborn; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Effect of Low-Intensity vs Standard-Intensity Warfarin Prophylaxis on Venous Thromboembolism or Death Among Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Brian F Gage; Anne R Bass; Hannah Lin; Scott C Woller; Scott M Stevens; Noor Al-Hammadi; Jeffrey L Anderson; Juan Li; Tomás Rodriguez; J Philip Miller; Gwendolyn A McMillin; Robert C Pendleton; Amir K Jaffer; Cristi R King; Brandi Whipple; Rhonda Porche-Sorbet; Lynnae Napoli; Kerri Merritt; Anna M Thompson; Gina Hyun; Wesley Hollomon; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley; Gerard Moskowitz; Victor Dávila-Román; Charles S Eby
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Use of signals and systems engineering to improve the safety of warfarin initiation.

Authors:  G Hyun; J Li; A R Bass; A Mohapatra; S C Woller; H Lin; C Eby; G A McMillin; B F Gage
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  Warfarin pharmacogenetics: does more accurate dosing benefit patients?

Authors:  Charles Eby
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.180

Review 9.  Effect of genetic variants, especially CYP2C9 and VKORC1, on the pharmacology of warfarin.

Authors:  Erik Fung; Nikolaos A Patsopoulos; Steven M Belknap; Daniel J O'Rourke; John F Robb; Jeffrey L Anderson; Nicholas W Shworak; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.180

10.  Development of a pharmacogenetic-guided warfarin dosing algorithm for Puerto Rican patients.

Authors:  Alga S Ramos; Richard L Seip; Giselle Rivera-Miranda; Marcos E Felici-Giovanini; Rafael Garcia-Berdecia; Yirelia Alejandro-Cowan; Mohan Kocherla; Iadelisse Cruz; Juan F Feliu; Carmen L Cadilla; Jessica Y Renta; Krystyna Gorowski; Cunegundo Vergara; Gualberto Ruaño; Jorge Duconge
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.