Literature DB >> 19679631

Interactive modeling for ongoing utility of pharmacogenetic diagnostic testing: application for warfarin therapy.

Mark W Linder1, Marjorie Bon Homme, Kristen K Reynolds, Brian F Gage, Charles Eby, Natalia Silvestrov, Roland Valdes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The application of pharmacogenetic results requires demonstrable correlations between a test result and an indicated specific course of action. We developed a computational decision-support tool that combines patient-specific genotype and phenotype information to provide strategic dosage guidance. This tool, through estimating quantitative and temporal parameters associated with the metabolism- and concentration-dependent response to warfarin, provides the necessary patient-specific context for interpreting international normalized ratio (INR) measurements.
METHODS: We analyzed clinical information, plasma S-warfarin concentration, and CYP2C9 (cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily C, polypeptide 9) and VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex, subunit 1) genotypes for 137 patients with stable INRs. Plasma S-warfarin concentrations were evaluated by VKORC1 genotype (-1639G>A). The steady-state plasma S-warfarin concentration was calculated with CYP2C9 genotype-based clearance rates and compared with actual measurements.
RESULTS: The plasma S-warfarin concentration required to yield the target INR response is significantly (P < 0.05) associated with VKORC1 -1639G>A genotype (GG, 0.68 mg/L; AG, 0.48 mg/L; AA, 0.27 mg/L). Modeling of the plasma S-warfarin concentration according to CYP2C9 genotype predicted 58% of the variation in measured S-warfarin concentration: Measured [S-warfarin] = 0.67(Estimated [S-warfarin]) + 0.16 mg/L.
CONCLUSIONS: The target interval of plasma S-warfarin concentration required to yield a therapeutic INR can be predicted from the VKORC1 genotype (pharmacodynamics), and the progressive changes in S-warfarin concentration after repeated daily dosing can be predicted from the CYP2C9 genotype (pharmacokinetics). Combining the application of multivariate equations for estimating the maintenance dose with genotype-guided pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics modeling provides a powerful tool for maximizing the value of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 test results for ongoing application to patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19679631      PMCID: PMC3131846          DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.125898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  37 in total

1.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916.

Authors:  D Du Bois; E F Du Bois
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetics: a laboratory tool for optimizing therapeutic efficiency.

Authors:  M W Linder; R A Prough; R Valdes
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Major bleeding in outpatients treated with warfarin: incidence and prediction by factors known at the start of outpatient therapy.

Authors:  C S Landefeld; L Goldman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Clinical observations with the amiodarone/warfarin interaction: dosing relationships with long-term therapy.

Authors:  Cynthia A Sanoski; Jerry L Bauman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Warfarin dose adjustments based on CYP2C9 genetic polymorphisms.

Authors:  Mark W Linder; Stephen Looney; Jesse E Adams; Nancy Johnson; Deborah Antonino-Green; Nichole Lacefield; Bonny L Bukaveckas; Roland Valdes
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Anticoagulant-related bleeding: clinical epidemiology, prediction, and prevention.

Authors:  C S Landefeld; R J Beyth
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Integrating genomic based information into clinical warfarin (Coumadin) management: an illustrative case report.

Authors:  Anthony LaSala; Bruce Bower; Andreas Windemuth; C Michael White; Mohan Kocherla; Richard Seip; Jorge Duconge; Gualberto Ruaño
Journal:  Conn Med       Date:  2008-08

8.  Influence of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms on warfarin maintenance dose and metabolic clearance.

Authors:  Maria Gabriella Scordo; Vittorio Pengo; Edoardo Spina; Marja Liisa Dahl; Milena Gusella; Roberto Padrini
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Warfarin: what are the clinical implications of an out-of-range-therapeutic international normalized ratio?

Authors:  Geno J Merli; George Tzanis
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Use of pharmacogenetics and clinical factors to predict the maintenance dose of warfarin.

Authors:  Brian F Gage; Charles Eby; Paul E Milligan; Gerald A Banet; Jill R Duncan; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of methods for achieving stable INR in healthy subjects during a multiple-dose warfarin study.

Authors:  Jill C Chappell; Gemma Dickinson; Malcolm I Mitchell; Harry Haber; Yan Jin; Evelyn D Lobo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Pharmacogenetic warfarin dose refinements remain significantly influenced by genetic factors after one week of therapy.

Authors:  Benjamin D Horne; Petra A Lenzini; Mia Wadelius; Andrea L Jorgensen; Stephen E Kimmel; Paul M Ridker; Niclas Eriksson; Jeffrey L Anderson; Munir Pirmohamed; Nita A Limdi; Robert C Pendleton; Gwendolyn A McMillin; James K Burmester; Daniel Kurnik; C Michael Stein; Michael D Caldwell; Charles S Eby; Anders Rane; Jonatan D Lindh; Jae-Gook Shin; Ho-Sook Kim; Pantep Angchaisuksiri; Robert J Glynn; Kathryn E Kronquist; John F Carlquist; Gloria R Grice; Robert L Barrack; Juan Li; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 3.  Genotype-based dosing algorithms for warfarin therapy: data review and recommendations.

Authors:  Eric G Johnson; Benjamin D Horne; John F Carlquist; Jeffrey L Anderson
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  How to use warfarin assays in patient management: analysis of 437 warfarin measurements in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Kyunghoon Lee; Hye In Woo; Oh Young Bang; Young-Keun On; June Soo Kim; Soo-Youn Lee
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Effect of genetic variants, especially CYP2C9 and VKORC1, on the pharmacology of warfarin.

Authors:  Erik Fung; Nikolaos A Patsopoulos; Steven M Belknap; Daniel J O'Rourke; John F Robb; Jeffrey L Anderson; Nicholas W Shworak; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.180

6.  Prospective pilot trial of PerMIT versus standard anticoagulation service management of patients initiating oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Mark P Borgman; Robert C Pendleton; Gwendolyn A McMillin; Kristen K Reynolds; Sara Vazquez; Andrew Freeman; Andrew Wilson; Roland Valdes; Mark W Linder
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Effect of Genotype-Guided Warfarin Dosing on Clinical Events and Anticoagulation Control Among Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: The GIFT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Brian F Gage; Anne R Bass; Hannah Lin; Scott C Woller; Scott M Stevens; Noor Al-Hammadi; Juan Li; Tomás Rodríguez; J Philip Miller; Gwendolyn A McMillin; Robert C Pendleton; Amir K Jaffer; Cristi R King; Brandi DeVore Whipple; Rhonda Porche-Sorbet; Lynnae Napoli; Kerri Merritt; Anna M Thompson; Gina Hyun; Jeffrey L Anderson; Wesley Hollomon; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley; Gerard Moskowitz; Victor Dávila-Román; Charles S Eby
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Prediction of warfarin maintenance dose in Han Chinese patients using a mechanistic model based on genetic and non-genetic factors.

Authors:  Yuan Lu; Jinbo Yang; Haiyan Zhang; Jin Yang
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Genetics informatics trial (GIFT) of warfarin to prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT): rationale and study design.

Authors:  E J Do; P Lenzini; C S Eby; A R Bass; G A McMillin; S M Stevens; S C Woller; R C Pendleton; J L Anderson; P Proctor; R M Nunley; V Davila-Roman; B F Gage
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.550

10.  Canalization effect in the coagulation cascade and the interindividual variability of oral anticoagulant response. A simulation study.

Authors:  Alexandru D Corlan; John Ross
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.