Literature DB >> 31479138

Effect of Low-Intensity vs Standard-Intensity Warfarin Prophylaxis on Venous Thromboembolism or Death Among Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Brian F Gage1, Anne R Bass2, Hannah Lin1,3, Scott C Woller4,5, Scott M Stevens4,5, Noor Al-Hammadi1, Jeffrey L Anderson5,6, Juan Li1, Tomás Rodriguez1, J Philip Miller1, Gwendolyn A McMillin7, Robert C Pendleton5, Amir K Jaffer8, Cristi R King1, Brandi Whipple1, Rhonda Porche-Sorbet1, Lynnae Napoli5, Kerri Merritt2, Anna M Thompson1,9, Gina Hyun1,10, Wesley Hollomon11, Robert L Barrack12, Ryan M Nunley12, Gerard Moskowitz1, Victor Dávila-Román1, Charles S Eby1,13.   

Abstract

Importance: The optimal international normalized ratio (INR) to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in warfarin-treated patients with recent arthroplasty is unknown. Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of a target INR of 1.8 vs 2.5 for VTE prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: The randomized Genetic Informatics Trial (GIFT) of Warfarin to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis enrolled 1650 patients aged 65 years or older initiating warfarin for elective hip or knee arthroplasty at 6 US medical centers. Enrollment began in April 2011 and follow-up concluded in October 2016. Interventions: In a 2 × 2 factorial design, participants were randomized to a target INR of 1.8 (n = 823) or 2.5 (n = 827) and to either genotype-guided or clinically guided warfarin dosing. For the first 11 days of therapy, open-label warfarin dosing was guided by a web application. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the composite of VTE (within 60 days) or death (within 30 days). Participants underwent screening duplex ultrasound postoperatively. The hypothesis was that an INR target of 1.8 would be noninferior to an INR target of 2.5, using a noninferiority margin of 3% for the absolute risk of VTE. Secondary end points were bleeding and INR values of 4 or more.
Results: Among 1650 patients who were randomized (mean age, 72.1 years; 1049 women [63.6%]; 1502 white [91.0%]), 1597 (96.8%) received at least 1 dose of warfarin and were included in the primary analysis. The rate of the primary composite outcome of VTE or death was 5.1% (41 of 804) in the low-intensity-warfarin group (INR target, 1.8) vs 3.8% (30 of 793) in the standard-treatment-warfarin group (INR target, 2.5), for a difference of 1.3% (1-sided 95% CI, -∞ to 3.05%, P = .06 for noninferiority). Major bleeding occurred in 0.4% of patients in the low-intensity group and 0.9% of patients in the standard-intensity group, for a difference of -0.5% (95% CI, -1.6% to 0.4%). The INR values of 4 or more occurred in 4.5% of patients in the low-intensity group and 12.2% of the standard-intensity group, for a difference of -7.8% (95% CI, -10.5% to -5.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among older patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty and receiving warfarin prophylaxis, an international normalized ratio goal of 1.8 compared with 2.5 did not meet the criterion for noninferiority for risk of the composite outcome of VTE or death. However, the trial may have been underpowered to meet this criterion and further research may be warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01006733.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31479138      PMCID: PMC6724181          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.12085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  32 in total

1.  Clinical classification schemes for predicting hemorrhage: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (NRAF).

Authors:  Brian F Gage; Yan Yan; Paul E Milligan; Amy D Waterman; Robert Culverhouse; Michael W Rich; Martha J Radford
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Preference-based antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: implications for clinical decision making.

Authors:  Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Brian F Gage; Alan A Montgomery; Alistair Howitt; Richard Thomson; P J Devereaux; Joanne Protheroe; Tom Fahey; David Armstrong; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Long-term, low-intensity warfarin therapy for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Paul M Ridker; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Ellie Danielson; Yves Rosenberg; Charles S Eby; Steven R Deitcher; Mary Cushman; Stephan Moll; Craig M Kessler; C Gregory Elliott; Rolf Paulson; Turnly Wong; Kenneth A Bauer; Bruce A Schwartz; Joseph P Miletich; Henri Bounameaux; Robert J Glynn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Anticoagulation intensity and outcomes among patients prescribed oral anticoagulant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natalie Oake; Alison Jennings; Alan J Forster; Dean Fergusson; Steve Doucette; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Laboratory and clinical outcomes of pharmacogenetic vs. clinical protocols for warfarin initiation in orthopedic patients.

Authors:  P A Lenzini; G R Grice; P E Milligan; M B Dowd; S Subherwal; E Deych; C S Eby; C R King; R M Porche-Sorbet; C V Murphy; R Marchand; E A Millican; R L Barrack; J C Clohisy; K Kronquist; S K Gatchel; B F Gage
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  Does "excessive" anticoagulation predispose to periprosthetic infection?

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Elie Ghanem; Ashish Joshi; Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Comparison of low-intensity warfarin therapy with conventional-intensity warfarin therapy for long-term prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Jeffrey S Ginsberg; Michael J Kovacs; David R Anderson; Philip Wells; Jim A Julian; Betsy MacKinnon; Jeffrey I Weitz; Mark A Crowther; Sean Dolan; Alexander G Turpie; William Geerts; Susan Solymoss; Paul van Nguyen; Christine Demers; Susan R Kahn; Jeannine Kassis; Marc Rodger; Julie Hambleton; Michael Gent
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Effect of intensity of oral anticoagulation on stroke severity and mortality in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Elaine M Hylek; Alan S Go; Yuchiao Chang; Nancy G Jensvold; Lori E Henault; Joe V Selby; Daniel E Singer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Optimal initial dose adjustment of warfarin in orthopedic patients.

Authors:  Petra A Lenzini; Gloria R Grice; Paul E Milligan; Susan K Gatchel; Elena Deych; Charles S Eby; R Stephen J Burnett; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Use of pharmacogenetic and clinical factors to predict the therapeutic dose of warfarin.

Authors:  B F Gage; C Eby; J A Johnson; E Deych; M J Rieder; P M Ridker; P E Milligan; G Grice; P Lenzini; A E Rettie; C L Aquilante; L Grosso; S Marsh; T Langaee; L E Farnett; D Voora; D L Veenstra; R J Glynn; A Barrett; H L McLeod
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Application of fresh frozen plasma transfusion in the management of excessive warfarin-associated anticoagulation.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Luo; Chunya Ma; Yang Yu
Journal:  Blood Sci       Date:  2022-05-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.