Literature DB >> 21255252

Predicting the warfarin maintenance dose in elderly inpatients at treatment initiation: accuracy of dosing algorithms incorporating or not VKORC1/CYP2C9 genotypes.

C Moreau1, E Pautas, I Gouin-Thibault, J-L Golmard, I Mahé, C Mulot, M-A Loriot, V Siguret.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Initiating warfarin is challenging in frail elderly patients because of low-dose requirements and interindividual variability.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether incorporating VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotype information in different models helped to predict the warfarin maintenance dose when added to clinical data and INR values at baseline (Day 0), and during warfarin induction. PATIENTS: We prospectively enrolled 187 elderly inpatients (mean age, 85.6 years), all starting on warfarin using the same 'geriatric dosing-algorithm' based on the INR value measured on the day after three 4-mg warfarin doses (INR(3)) and on INR(6 ± 1).
RESULTS: On Day 0, the clinical model failed to accurately predict the maintenance dose (R(2) < 0.10). Adding the VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes to the model increased R(2) to 0.31. On Day 3, the INR(3) value was the strongest predictor, completely embedding the VKORC1 genotype, whereas the CYP2C9 genotype remained a significant predictor (model- R(2) 0.55). On Day 6 ± 1, none of the genotypes predicted the maintenance dose. Finally, the simple 'geriatric dosing-algorithm' was the most accurate algorithm on Day 3 (R(2) 0.77) and Day 6 (R(2) 0.81), under-estimating (≥ 1 mg) and over-estimating the dose (≥ 1 mg) in fewer than 10% and 2% of patients, respectively. Clinical models and the 'geriatric dosing-algorithm' were validated on an independent sample.
CONCLUSIONS: Before starting warfarin therapy, the VKORC1 genotype is the best predictor of the maintenance dose. Once treatment is started using induction doses tailored for elderly patients, the contribution of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes in dose refinement is negligible compared with two INR values measured during the first week of treatment.
© 2011 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21255252     DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04213.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  14 in total

1.  Pharmacogenetic warfarin dose refinements remain significantly influenced by genetic factors after one week of therapy.

Authors:  Benjamin D Horne; Petra A Lenzini; Mia Wadelius; Andrea L Jorgensen; Stephen E Kimmel; Paul M Ridker; Niclas Eriksson; Jeffrey L Anderson; Munir Pirmohamed; Nita A Limdi; Robert C Pendleton; Gwendolyn A McMillin; James K Burmester; Daniel Kurnik; C Michael Stein; Michael D Caldwell; Charles S Eby; Anders Rane; Jonatan D Lindh; Jae-Gook Shin; Ho-Sook Kim; Pantep Angchaisuksiri; Robert J Glynn; Kathryn E Kronquist; John F Carlquist; Gloria R Grice; Robert L Barrack; Juan Li; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 2.  Optimizing the use of anticoagulants (heparins and oral anticoagulants) in the elderly.

Authors:  Virginie Siguret; Isabelle Gouin-Thibault; Pascale Gaussem; Eric Pautas
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Genotype-based dosing algorithms for warfarin therapy: data review and recommendations.

Authors:  Eric G Johnson; Benjamin D Horne; John F Carlquist; Jeffrey L Anderson
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Inter-individual differences in baseline coagulation activities and their implications for international normalized ratio control during warfarin initiation therapy.

Authors:  Yosuke Ichimura; Harumi Takahashi; Michael T M Lee; Mari Shiomi; Kiyoshi Mihara; Takashi Morita; Yuan-Tsong Chen; Hirotoshi Echizen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Genetic polymorphisms and dosing of vitamin K antagonist in Indian patients after heart valve surgery.

Authors:  Shiv Kumar Choudhary; Arun Basil Mathew; Amit Parhar; Milind Padmakar Hote; Sachin Talwar; Palleti Rajashekhar
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-04-22

Review 6.  Pharmacogenetics and individualizing drug treatment during pregnancy.

Authors:  David M Haas
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 7.  A review of pharmacogenetics of adverse drug reactions in elderly people.

Authors:  Maurizio Cardelli; Francesca Marchegiani; Andrea Corsonello; Fabrizia Lattanzio; Mauro Provinciali
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Effect of genetic variants, especially CYP2C9 and VKORC1, on the pharmacology of warfarin.

Authors:  Erik Fung; Nikolaos A Patsopoulos; Steven M Belknap; Daniel J O'Rourke; John F Robb; Jeffrey L Anderson; Nicholas W Shworak; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.180

9.  Efficiency and effectiveness of the use of an acenocoumarol pharmacogenetic dosing algorithm versus usual care in patients with venous thromboembolic disease initiating oral anticoagulation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Antonio J Carcas; Alberto M Borobia; Marta Velasco; Francisco Abad-Santos; Manuel Quintana Díaz; Carmen Fernández-Capitán; Nuria Ruiz-Giménez; Olga Madridano; Pilar Llamas Sillero
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  An acenocoumarol dosing algorithm using clinical and pharmacogenetic data in Spanish patients with thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  Alberto M Borobia; Rubin Lubomirov; Elena Ramírez; Alicia Lorenzo; Armando Campos; Raul Muñoz-Romo; Carmen Fernández-Capitán; Jesús Frías; Antonio J Carcas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.