Literature DB >> 22184480

Quantifying density fluctuations in volumes of all shapes and sizes using indirect umbrella sampling.

Amish J Patel1, Patrick Varilly, David Chandler, Shekhar Garde.   

Abstract

Water density fluctuations are an important statistical mechanical observable that is related to many-body correlations, as well as hydrophobic hydration and interactions. Local water density fluctuations at a solid-water surface have also been proposed as a measure of it's hydrophobicity. These fluctuations can be quantified by calculating the probability, P(v)(N), of observing N waters in a probe volume of interest v. When v is large, calculating P(v)(N) using molecular dynamics simulations is challenging, as the probability of observing very few waters is exponentially small, and the standard procedure for overcoming this problem (umbrella sampling in N) leads to undesirable impulsive forces. Patel et al. [J. Phys. Chem. B, 114, 1632 (2010)] have recently developed an indirect umbrella sampling (INDUS) method, that samples a coarse-grained particle number to obtain P(v)(N) in cuboidal volumes. Here, we present and demonstrate an extension of that approach to volumes of other basic shapes, like spheres and cylinders, as well as to collections of such volumes. We further describe the implementation of INDUS in the NPT ensemble and calculate P(v)(N) distributions over a broad range of pressures. Our method may be of particular interest in characterizing the hydrophobicity of interfaces of proteins, nanotubes and related systems.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22184480      PMCID: PMC3241221          DOI: 10.1007/s10955-011-0269-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stat Phys        ISSN: 0022-4715            Impact factor:   1.548


  32 in total

1.  Origin of Entropy Convergence in Hydrophobic Hydration and Protein Folding.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-12-09       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Mapping hydrophobicity at the nanoscale: applications to heterogeneous surfaces and proteins.

Authors:  Hari Acharya; Srivathsan Vembanur; Sumanth N Jamadagni; Shekhar Garde
Journal:  Faraday Discuss       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.008

3.  Effect of pressure on the phase behavior and structure of water confined between nanoscale hydrophobic and hydrophilic plates.

Authors:  Nicolas Giovambattista; Peter J Rossky; Pablo G Debenedetti
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2006-04-13

4.  Quantifying water density fluctuations and compressibility of hydration shells of hydrophobic solutes and proteins.

Authors:  Sapna Sarupria; Shekhar Garde
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Characterizing hydrophobicity of interfaces by using cavity formation, solute binding, and water correlations.

Authors:  Rahul Godawat; Sumanth N Jamadagni; Shekhar Garde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Studying pressure denaturation of a protein by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Sapna Sarupria; Tuhin Ghosh; Angel E García; Shekhar Garde
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-05-15

7.  The pressure dependence of hydrophobic interactions is consistent with the observed pressure denaturation of proteins.

Authors:  G Hummer; S Garde; A E García; M E Paulaitis; L R Pratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Fluctuations of water near extended hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces.

Authors:  Amish J Patel; Patrick Varilly; David Chandler
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 9.  Water in nonpolar confinement: from nanotubes to proteins and beyond.

Authors:  Jayendran C Rasaiah; Shekhar Garde; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.703

10.  Hydrophobic collapse in multidomain protein folding.

Authors:  Ruhong Zhou; Xuhui Huang; Claudio J Margulis; Bruce J Berne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  10 in total

1.  Extended surfaces modulate hydrophobic interactions of neighboring solutes.

Authors:  Amish J Patel; Patrick Varilly; Sumanth N Jamadagni; Hari Acharya; Shekhar Garde; David Chandler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Pathways to dewetting in hydrophobic confinement.

Authors:  Richard C Remsing; Erte Xi; Srivathsan Vembanur; Sumit Sharma; Pablo G Debenedetti; Shekhar Garde; Amish J Patel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Identifying hydrophobic protein patches to inform protein interaction interfaces.

Authors:  Nicholas B Rego; Erte Xi; Amish J Patel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Simulations of HIV capsid protein dimerization reveal the effect of chemistry and topography on the mechanism of hydrophobic protein association.

Authors:  Naiyin Yu; Michael F Hagan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Spontaneous recovery of superhydrophobicity on nanotextured surfaces.

Authors:  Suruchi Prakash; Erte Xi; Amish J Patel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Molecular explanation for why talc surfaces can be both hydrophilic and hydrophobic.

Authors:  Benjamin Rotenberg; Amish J Patel; David Chandler
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Hydrophobicity of proteins and nanostructured solutes is governed by topographical and chemical context.

Authors:  Erte Xi; Vasudevan Venkateshwaran; Lijuan Li; Nicholas Rego; Amish J Patel; Shekhar Garde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sitting at the edge: how biomolecules use hydrophobicity to tune their interactions and function.

Authors:  Amish J Patel; Patrick Varilly; Sumanth N Jamadagni; Michael F Hagan; David Chandler; Shekhar Garde
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  The energy landscape of adenylate kinase during catalysis.

Authors:  S Jordan Kerns; Roman V Agafonov; Young-Jin Cho; Francesco Pontiggia; Renee Otten; Dimitar V Pachov; Steffen Kutter; Lien A Phung; Padraig N Murphy; Vu Thai; Tom Alber; Michael F Hagan; Dorothee Kern
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  A generalized deep learning approach for local structure identification in molecular simulations.

Authors:  Ryan S DeFever; Colin Targonski; Steven W Hall; Melissa C Smith; Sapna Sarupria
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 9.825

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.