Literature DB >> 22179312

Value of enhanced transrectal ultrasound targeted biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis: a retrospective data analysis.

Friedrich Aigner1, Georg Schäfer, Eberhard Steiner, Werner Jaschke, Wolfgang Horninger, Thomas R W Herrmann, Udo Nagele, Ethan J Halpern, Ferdinand Frauscher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate enhanced transrectal ultrasound (E-TRUS) techniques including real-time sonoelastography (RTE) and contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CE-TRUS) for prostate cancer (PCa) detection in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum levels.
METHODS: A total of 133 men with elevated PSA serum levels (≥1.25 ng/mL) showed PCa suspicious lesions on E-TRUS. RTE was done to assess tissue elasticity, and hard areas of the peripheral zone were considered suspicious for malignancy. CE-TRUS was done with cadence contrast pulse sequencing (CPS) technique to assess tumor neoangiogenesis, which were defined as areas with increased and rapid contrast enhancement in the peripheral zone and were considered suspicious for malignancy. All patients underwent an E-TRUS-targeted biopsy of the prostate into the suspected lesions. PCa detection rates for E-TRUS were analyzed.
RESULTS: PCa detection rate of E-TRUS-targeted biopsy was 59.4% (79/133) using a median of 5 cores per patient and a median of 3 cores per lesion. RTE showed a per patient detection rate of 56.5% (70/124) and CE-TRUS of 74.2% (69/93). The subgroup analysis demonstrated the highest detection rates in prostate volumes <40 mL (72.2%) and in men older than 70 years (87%).
CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of CE-TRUS and RTE is feasible and allows for targeted biopsy and may improve PCa detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22179312     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0809-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  18 in total

1.  Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression.

Authors:  T A Krouskop; T M Wheeler; F Kallel; B S Garra; T Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.578

2.  MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies.

Authors:  Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Matthias P Lichy; Udo Nagele; Markus A Kuczyk; Axel S Merseburger; Joerg Hennenlotter; Stefan Corvin; Karl-Dietrich Sievert; Claus D Claussen; Arnulf Stenzl; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  [Multiparametric MRI of the prostate: method for early detection of prostate cancer?].

Authors:  H-P Schlemmer
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2010-10-22

Review 4.  Angiogenesis in prostate cancer: its role in disease progression and possible therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  R J A van Moorselaar; E E Voest
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 4.102

5.  Reassessing the diagnostic yield of saturation biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  Richard A Ashley; Brant A Inman; Jonathan C Routh; Lance A Mynderse; Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  Thomas Hambrock; Diederik M Somford; Caroline Hoeks; Stefan A W Bouwense; Henkjan Huisman; Derya Yakar; Inge M van Oort; J Alfred Witjes; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Clinical and pathologic tumor characteristics of prostate cancer as a function of the number of biopsy cores: a retrospective study.

Authors:  C K Naughton; D S Smith; P A Humphrey; W J Catalona; D W Keetch
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using cadence-contrast pulse sequencing technology for targeted biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  Friedrich Aigner; Leo Pallwein; Michael Mitterberger; Germar M Pinggera; Gregor Mikuz; Wolfgang Horninger; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Prostate cancer diagnosis: should patients with prostate specific antigen >10ng/mL have stratified prostate biopsy protocols?

Authors:  Joe Philip; Ramaswamy Manikandan; Pradip Javlé; Christopher S Foster
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2009-02-03

10.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Real-time elastography for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Georg Salomon; Jonas Schiffmann
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  [Ultrasonography of the prostate gland : From B‑image through multiparametric ultrasound to targeted biopsy].

Authors:  F Steinkohl; A Luger; J Bektic; F Aigner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  How do endoscopic bladder tumor resection techniques affect pathology practice? EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Uropathology (ESUP) survey.

Authors:  Selcuk Guven; Maurizio Colecchia; Pembe Oltulu; Giulia Bonfante; Dmitry Enikeev; Hasan Esen; Thomas Herrmann; Lukas Lusuardi; Salvatore Micali; Bashkar Somani; Andreas Skolarikos; Alberto Breda; Evangelos Liatsikos; Joan Palou Redorta; Ali Serdar Gozen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Application of Multiple Ultrasonic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yushan Liu; Shi Zeng; Ran Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 5.  A Review of Imaging Methods for Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Saradwata Sarkar; Sudipta Das
Journal:  Biomed Eng Comput Biol       Date:  2016-03-02

Review 6.  Diagnosis and Monitoring of Prostatic Lesions: A Comparison of Three Modalities: Multiparametric MRI, Fusion MRI/Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS), and Traditional TRUS.

Authors:  Antoinette Birs; Peter H Joyce; Zoran J Pavlovic; Alexander Lim
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-07-18

7.  Potentials and limitations of real-time elastography for prostate cancer detection: a whole-mount step section analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Junker; Georg Schäfer; Friedrich Aigner; Peter Schullian; Leo Pallwein-Prettner; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger; Ethan J Halpern; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-12-31

Review 8.  Multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arnoud Postema; Massimo Mischi; Jean de la Rosette; Hessel Wijkstra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Real-time elastography of the prostate.

Authors:  D Junker; T De Zordo; M Quentin; M Ladurner; J Bektic; W Horniger; W Jaschke; F Aigner
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates of various prostate biopsy methods for patients with prostate-specific antigen levels of <10.0 ng/mL in real-world practice.

Authors:  Kyung Tak Oh; Kyo Chul Koo; Byung Ha Chung; Kwang Suk Lee
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2019-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.