Literature DB >> 9801104

Clinical and pathologic tumor characteristics of prostate cancer as a function of the number of biopsy cores: a retrospective study.

C K Naughton1, D S Smith, P A Humphrey, W J Catalona, D W Keetch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Many men with negative prostate biopsies and persistently elevated serum total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) values will have cancer detected on a repeated biopsy. An important issue is whether the cancer would have been detected on the initial biopsy had more biopsy samples been obtained. The objective of our study was to retrospectively characterize the clinical and pathologic tumor features associated with men who underwent sextant core biopsies compared with men who needed more than six core biopsies during one or more biopsy sessions to detect prostate cancer. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-estimated prostatic volume was evaluated to determine whether the number of biopsy cores needed for prostate cancer detection was influenced by gland size.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the number of biopsy core samples obtained in 185 men (mean age 63+/-6 years) enrolled in our PSA-based screening study for prostate cancer who were found to have prostate cancer and elected radical prostatectomy as treatment. Correlation coefficients were calculated and univariate analyses were performed to evaluate clinical (age, tPSA, TRUS volume, PSA density) and pathologic (Gleason score, pathologic weight, organ confinement, "possibly harmless" cancer) characteristics associated with men who required more biopsy cores to detect the cancer.
RESULTS: Of the 185 men, 103 (56%) had 6 or fewer total biopsy cores taken and 82 (44%) had more than 6 cores (44 [24%] of 185 had 7 to 12 cores and 38 [20%] of 185 had 13 or more cores). There was a positive correlation between age, serum tPSA, TRUS-determined prostate volume, and pathologic specimen weight and an increasing number of total cores (all P values < 0.05). The number of biopsy cores was not associated with PSA density, Gleason score, cancer volume, organ confinement, or "possibly harmless" cancers (all P values > 0.05). Men with a TRUS volume 30 cc or less (46%) required a mean of 8 total cores to detect the cancer compared with a mean of 11 cores (P = 0.003) in men with a TRUS volume greater than 30 cc (54%). A greater percentage of men with a TRUS prostate volume greater than 30 cc compared with men whose volume was 30 cc or less would have had their cancer missed with only a six-core biopsy (64% versus 46%, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Sextant core biopsies may be inadequate to detect prostate cancer in some men. These data support the performance of more than six core biopsies to detect clinical prostate cancer. A prospective trial using TRUS-determined prostate volume to determine the number of cores to take is needed to accurately assess this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9801104     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00344-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  16 in total

1.  Transrectal real-time elastography-guided transperineal prostate biopsy as an improved tool for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Ren Wang; Jin-Jin Chen; Bing Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

2.  A questionnaire survey of patient preparation and techniques for prostate biopsy among urologists in the Kyushu and Okinawa regions of Japan.

Authors:  Masanori Noguchi; Kei Matsuoka; Hirofumi Koga; Hiroshi Kanetake; Masayuki Nakagawa; Seiji Naito
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Contrast enhanced transrectal ultrasound for the detection of prostate cancer: a randomized, double-blind trial of dutasteride pretreatment.

Authors:  Ethan J Halpern; Leonard G Gomella; Flemming Forsberg; Peter A McCue; Edouard J Trabulsi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Value of enhanced transrectal ultrasound targeted biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis: a retrospective data analysis.

Authors:  Friedrich Aigner; Georg Schäfer; Eberhard Steiner; Werner Jaschke; Wolfgang Horninger; Thomas R W Herrmann; Udo Nagele; Ethan J Halpern; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  A comparison of prostate cancer detection rates by 12 or 6 core biopsy at different prostate-specific antigen densities in Korean men.

Authors:  Hyeon Jeong; Byong Chang Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Eunsik Lee; Sang Eun Lee; Tae Beom Kim
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Role of magnetic resonance methods in the evaluation of prostate cancer: an Indian perspective.

Authors:  Naranamangalam R Jagannathan; Virendra Kumar; Rajeev Kumar; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  How to improve prostate biopsy detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  D K Ornstein; J Kang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Outcomes and trends of prostate biopsy for prostate cancer in Chinese men from 2003 to 2011.

Authors:  Rong Na; Haowen Jiang; Seong-Tae Kim; Yishuo Wu; Shijun Tong; Limin Zhang; Jianfeng Xu; Yinghao Sun; Qiang Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Diagnostic accuracy of prostate needle biopsy.

Authors:  Timothy Donahue; Judd Moul
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 10.  Extended and saturation needle biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kristin L Chrouser; Michael M Lieber
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.