Literature DB >> 27518898

Opaque bubble layer incidence in Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: comparison among different flap design parameters.

Leonardo Mastropasqua1, Roberta Calienno2, Manuela Lanzini1, Niccolò Salgari1, Sergio De Vecchi3, Rodolfo Mastropasqua4, Mario Nubile1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of opaque bubble layer (OBL) in femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flaps created with the support of Visumax Carl Zeiss femtosecond laser, planned with different flap diameters (7.90, 8.0, and 8.20 mm) and the same laser energy and power settings. Incidence of intraoperative OBL in flaps of consecutive 108 patients (216 eyes) subjected to bilateral femtosecond-assisted LASIK was considered. Flap creation was performed with the same laser design parameters (spot distance and energy offset) and different presetting diameters of 7.90 mm (72 eyes, group 1), 8 mm (72 eyes, group 2), and 8.20 mm (72 eyes, group 3). The incidence of OBL was considered and its extension was reported measuring involvement of different four corneal flap quadrants in which was theoretically divided the entire flap area; based on these data, OBL presence was classified as none (no evidence of OBL), minimal (minimal presence in not more that one quadrants corneal flap), mild (OBL presence in almost two or three quadrants without tendency to invade central cornea), and moderate (OBL presence in almost three quadrants with tendency to invade central cornea). In group 1, the incidence of OBL was of 23.6 % (17 eyes) with a mild/moderate presence; in group 2, incidence was 20.8 % (15 eyes) with mild presence. Group 3 presented a reduced OBL incidence (4.1 %, 3 eye) with a minimal presence. No statistically significant difference was found between group 1 and 2 (p = 0.8414).We found statistically significant differences between group 1 and group 3 (p = 0.0012) and between groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.0044). A significant reduction and extension of OBL incidence were evident when LASIK flap settings diameter was increased, and flap edge was closer to the contact glass border; this is probably consequent to a more effective gas dispersion outside of corneal flap.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femtosecond laser; LASIK; Opaque bubble layer; Refractive surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27518898     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0323-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  16 in total

1.  Possible risk factors and clinical effects of an opaque bubble layer created with femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Hyeong-Gi Jung; Jeonghee Kim; Tae-Hyung Lim
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Incidence, possible risk factors, and potential effects of an opaque bubble layer created by a femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Igor Kaiserman; Hillel S Maresky; Irit Bahar; David S Rootman
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 3.  Femtosecond lasers in ophthalmology.

Authors:  H Kaz Soong; João Baptista Malta
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 4.  Ultra-short pulse (femtosecond) laser surgery: initial use in LASIK flap creation.

Authors:  I Ratkay-Traub; T Juhasz; C Horvath; C Suarez; K Kiss; I Ferincz; R Kurtz
Journal:  Ophthalmol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-06

Review 5.  Cellular effects after laser in situ keratomileusis flap formation with femtosecond lasers: a review.

Authors:  Marcony R Santhiago; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Opaque bubble layer: incidence, risk factors, and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Chun-Hsiu Liu; Chi-Chin Sun; David Hui-Kang Ma; Jerry Chien-Chieh Huang; Chun-Fu Liu; Hsi-Fu Chen; Ching-Hsi Hsiao
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 7.  The use of the femtosecond laser in the customization of corneal flaps in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Stephen G Slade
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.761

8.  Laser in situ keratomileusis flap complications using mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser: retrospective comparison.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Jeffrey P Gardiner; Joshua A Schliesser; Ladan Espandar; Vahid Feiz; Mark D Mifflin; Joann C Chang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  First clinical results with the femtosecond neodynium-glass laser in refractive surgery.

Authors:  Imola Ratkay-Traub; Istvan E Ferincz; Tibor Juhasz; Ron M Kurtz; Ronald R Krueger
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Antonis Aristeidou; Elise V Taniguchi; Michael Tsatsos; Rodrigo Muller; Colm McAlinden; Roberto Pineda; Eleftherios I Paschalis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-07-14
View more
  2 in total

1.  Flap-making patterns and corneal characteristics influence opaque bubble layer occurrence in femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Xi He; Shi-Ming Li; Changbin Zhai; Li Zhang; Yue Wang; Xiumei Song; Yi Wang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Optical Vortex Beam for Gentle and Ultraprecise Intrastromal Corneal Dissection in Refractive Surgery.

Authors:  Sebastian Freidank; Alfred Vogel; Norbert Linz
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.283

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.