Literature DB >> 23657729

Comparison of keratocyte density after femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome from 3 months up to 5 years after LASIK.

Pilar Cañadas1, Laura de Benito-Llopis, José Luis Hernández-Verdejo, Miguel A Teus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare keratocyte density after mechanical microkeratome LASIK (MK-LASIK) and femtosecond-laser assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK).
METHODS: We performed a prospective study of myopic patients that underwent MK-LASIK or FS-LASIK. We measured keratocyte density 3 and 15 months, and 3-5 years after the surgery using confocal microscopy, and compared them with healthy, non-operated corneas.
RESULTS: Thirty-one eyes were included in the FS-LASIK group, 30 in the MK-LASIK group and 28 in the control group. Three months postoperatively, there was an increase in the keratocyte population of the whole cornea, mainly due to the mid and posterior stromal layers, in both treatment groups. It was also increased in the stromal bed after MK-LASIK, but not after FS-LASIK. In both groups, this was followed by a normalisation and stabilisation of cell density in those deeper layers 15 months after the surgery. Keratocyte density in the flap and stromal bed was decreased 15 months after FS- and MK-LASIK compared to 3 months postoperatively and compared to controls. It seemed to remain stable thereafter. In spite of this decrease, the average cell density throughout the cornea was not decreased compared to controls at any time point.
CONCLUSION: We found a reorganization of keratocytes density after LASIK, with an initial increase, followed by a decrease in the stromal flap and stromal bed 15 months postoperatively, and stable from then onwards, but still maintaining normal average densities in the total cornea. There were no differences between MK- and FS-LASIK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23657729     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2357-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  30 in total

1.  Change to corneal morphology after refractive surgery (myopic laser in situ keratomileusis) as viewed with a confocal microscope.

Authors:  Inma Perez-Gomez; Nthan Efron
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Flap dimensions created with the IntraLase FS laser.

Authors:  Perry S Binder
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Comparison of keratocyte density between keratoconus, post-laser in situ keratomileusis keratectasia, and uncomplicated post-laser in situ keratomileusis cases. A confocal scan study.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Javadi; Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi; Manijeh Mahdavi; Mehdi Yaseri; Hosein Mohammad Rabiei; Atefeh Javadi; Seyed Hamid Sajjadi
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Automated assessment of keratocyte density in stromal images from the ConfoScan 4 confocal microscope.

Authors:  Jay W McLaren; William M Bourne; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Cellular effects after laser in situ keratomileusis flap formation with femtosecond lasers: a review.

Authors:  Marcony R Santhiago; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Assessment of keratocyte activation following LASIK with flap creation using the IntraLase FS60 laser.

Authors:  W Matthew Petroll; R Wayne Bowman; H Dwight Cavanagh; Steven M Verity; V Vinod Mootha; James P McCulley
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Incidence of diffuse lamellar keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis associated with the IntraLase 15 kHz femtosecond laser and Moria M2 microkeratome.

Authors:  Raquel Gil-Cazorla; Miguel A Teus; Laura de Benito-Llopis; Irene Fuentes
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Confocal microscopy comparison of intralase femtosecond laser and Moria M2 microkeratome in LASIK.

Authors:  Jaime Javaloy; María T Vidal; Ayman M Abdelrahman; Alberto Artola; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  A mouse model of lamellar intrastromal femtosecond laser keratotomy: ultra-structural, inflammatory, and wound healing responses.

Authors:  R I Angunawela; R Poh; S S Chaurasia; D T Tan; J S Mehta
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.367

10.  A comparative confocal microscopy analysis after LASIK with the IntraLase femtosecond laser vs Hansatome microkeratome.

Authors:  Manuel Ramírez; Everardo Hernández-Quintela; Ramón Naranjo-Tackman
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  4 in total

1.  Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Nicolás Kahuam-López; Alejandro Navas; Carlos Castillo-Salgado; Enrique O Graue-Hernandez; Aida Jimenez-Corona; Antonio Ibarra
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-07

2.  Changes in Keratocyte Density and Visual Function Five Years After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis: Femtosecond Laser Versus Mechanical Microkeratome.

Authors:  Jay W McLaren; William M Bourne; Leo J Maguire; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Changes in the anterior cornea during the early stages of severe myopia prior to and following LASIK, as detected by confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Jinrong Zhao; Jinguo Yu; Liu Υang; Yang Liu; Shaozhen Zhao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Visual outcomes and management after corneal refractive surgery: A review.

Authors:  Ane Murueta-Goyena; Pilar Cañadas
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-11-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.