Literature DB >> 22151186

Evolution of brain impedance in dystonic patients treated by GPI electrical stimulation.

Simone Hemm1, Nathalie Vayssiere, Gérard Mennessier, Laura Cif, Michel Zanca, Patrice Ravel, Philippe Frerebeau, Philippe Coubes.   

Abstract

Deep Brain Stimulation is an effective treatment of generalized dystonia. Optimal stimulation parameters vary between patients. This article investigates the influence of electrical brain impedance and delivered current on the brain response to stimulation. Twenty-four patients were bilaterally stimulated in the globus pallidus internus through two implanted four-contact electrodes. The variation of brain impedance and current measurements was correlated with stimulation parameters, time course, and clinical outcome. When a contact was activated, a statistically significant and reversible decrease of brain impedance was found. Impedance and current values and their variations with time significantly differed between patients. The absolute impedance did not significantly correlate with the final outcome. We conclude that the reversible decrease of impedance reflects an adaptive long-term mechanism, which could be due to a plasticity phenomenon, but has no prognostic value. Impedance and current measurements give new complementary information for parameter adjustment and trouble shooting and should therefore be included in all patients' follow-up.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 22151186     DOI: 10.1111/j.1094-7159.2004.04009.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  14 in total

1.  Influence of heterogeneous and anisotropic tissue conductivity on electric field distribution in deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Mattias Aström; Jean-Jacques Lemaire; Karin Wårdell
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Sources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Christopher B Maks; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  In vivo impedance spectroscopy of deep brain stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Scott F Lempka; Svjetlana Miocinovic; Matthew D Johnson; Jerrold L Vitek; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Variation in deep brain stimulation electrode impedance over years following electrode implantation.

Authors:  David Satzer; David Lanctin; Lynn E Eberly; Aviva Abosch
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 1.875

5.  Temporal macrodynamics and microdynamics of the postoperative impedance at the tissue-electrode interface in deep brain stimulation patients.

Authors:  C Lungu; P Malone; T Wu; P Ghosh; B McElroy; K Zaghloul; T Patterson; M Hallett; Z Levine
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Evaluation of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/carbon nanotube neural electrode coatings for stimulation in the dorsal root ganglion.

Authors:  Christi L Kolarcik; Kasey Catt; Erika Rost; Ingrid N Albrecht; Dennis Bourbeau; Zhanhong Du; Takashi D Y Kozai; Xiliang Luo; Douglas J Weber; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  The influence of reactivity of the electrode-brain interface on the crossing electric current in therapeutic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  N Yousif; R Bayford; X Liu
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Experimental and theoretical characterization of the voltage distribution generated by deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Svjetlana Miocinovic; Scott F Lempka; Gary S Russo; Christopher B Maks; Christopher R Butson; Ken E Sakaie; Jerrold L Vitek; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  A Novel Lead Design for Modulation and Sensing of Deep Brain Structures.

Authors:  Allison T Connolly; Rio J Vetter; Jamille F Hetke; Benjamin A Teplitzky; Daryl R Kipke; David S Pellinen; David J Anderson; Kenneth B Baker; Jerrold L Vitek; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Current-controlled deep brain stimulation reduces in vivo voltage fluctuations observed during voltage-controlled stimulation.

Authors:  Scott F Lempka; Matthew D Johnson; Svjetlana Miocinovic; Jerrold L Vitek; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.