Literature DB >> 22101515

Influence of heterogeneous and anisotropic tissue conductivity on electric field distribution in deep brain stimulation.

Mattias Aström1, Jean-Jacques Lemaire, Karin Wårdell.   

Abstract

The aim was to quantify the influence of heterogeneous isotropic and heterogeneous anisotropic tissue on the spatial distribution of the electric field during deep brain stimulation (DBS). Three finite element tissue models were created of one patient treated with DBS. Tissue conductivity was modelled as (I) homogeneous isotropic, (II) heterogeneous isotropic based on MRI, and (III) heterogeneous anisotropic based on diffusion tensor MRI. Modelled DBS electrodes were positioned in the subthalamic area, the pallidum, and the internal capsule in each tissue model. Electric fields generated during DBS were simulated for each model and target-combination and visualized with isolevels at 0.20 (inner), and 0.05 V mm(-1) (outer). Statistical and vector analysis was used for evaluation of the distribution of the electric field. Heterogeneous isotropic tissue altered the spatial distribution of the electric field by up to 4% at inner, and up to 10% at outer isolevel. Heterogeneous anisotropic tissue influenced the distribution of the electric field by up to 18 and 15% at each isolevel, respectively. The influence of heterogeneous and anisotropic tissue on the electric field may be clinically relevant in anatomic regions that are functionally subdivided and surrounded by multiple fibres of passage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22101515     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-011-0842-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  42 in total

Review 1.  Processing and visualization for diffusion tensor MRI.

Authors:  C-F Westin; S E Maier; H Mamata; A Nabavi; F A Jolesz; R Kikinis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Fiber tract-based atlas of human white matter anatomy.

Authors:  Setsu Wakana; Hangyi Jiang; Lidia M Nagae-Poetscher; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Selection of stimulus parameters for deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexis M Kuncel; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Resolution of Crossing Fibers with Constrained Compressed Sensing using Traditional Diffusion Tensor MRI.

Authors:  Bennett A Landman; Hanlin Wan; John A Bogovic; Pierre-Louis Bazin; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2010

5.  Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Scott E Cooper; Jaimie M Henderson; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Conductivity of living intracranial tissues.

Authors:  J Latikka; T Kuurne; H Eskola
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Specific impedance of cerebral white matter.

Authors:  P W Nicholson
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Patient-specific models of deep brain stimulation: influence of field model complexity on neural activation predictions.

Authors:  Ashutosh Chaturvedi; Christopher R Butson; Scott F Lempka; Scott E Cooper; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  Brain mapping in stereotactic surgery: a brief overview from the probabilistic targeting to the patient-based anatomic mapping.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Lemaire; Jérôme Coste; Lemlih Ouchchane; François Caire; Christophe Nuti; Philippe Derost; Vittorio Cristini; Jean Gabrillargues; Simone Hemm; Franck Durif; Jean Chazal
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Factors predicting improvement in primary generalized dystonia treated by pallidal deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Xavier Vasques; Laura Cif; Victoria Gonzalez; Claire Nicholson; Philippe Coubes
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 10.338

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  A review of anisotropic conductivity models of brain white matter based on diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Zhanxiong Wu; Yang Liu; Ming Hong; Xiaohui Yu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Influences of interpolation error, electrode geometry, and the electrode-tissue interface on models of electric fields produced by deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Sagar Naik; Warren M Grill
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Analyzing the tradeoff between electrical complexity and accuracy in patient-specific computational models of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Anodic stimulation misunderstood: preferential activation of fiber orientations with anodic waveforms in deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Gordon Duffley; Johannes Vorwerk; Alan D Dorval; Christopher R Butson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Impact of brain shift on neural pathways in deep brain stimulation: a preliminary analysis via multi-physics finite element models.

Authors:  Ma Luo; Saramati Narasimhan; Paul S Larson; Alastair J Martin; Peter E Konrad; Michael I Miga
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Probabilistic mapping of deep brain stimulation effects in essential tremor.

Authors:  Till A Dembek; Michael T Barbe; Mattias Åström; Mauritius Hoevels; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Gereon R Fink; Lars Timmermann
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Patient-Specific Electric Field Simulations and Acceleration Measurements for Objective Analysis of Intraoperative Stimulation Tests in the Thalamus.

Authors:  Simone Hemm; Daniela Pison; Fabiola Alonso; Ashesh Shah; Jérôme Coste; Jean-Jacques Lemaire; Karin Wårdell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Exposure of Live-Line Workers to Magnetic Fields: A Dosimetric Analysis.

Authors:  Oriano Bottauscio; Alessandro Arduino; Davide Bavastro; Davide Capra; Arianna Guarneri; Alessandro A Parizia; Luca Zilberti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Investigation into Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Designs: A Patient-Specific Simulation Study.

Authors:  Fabiola Alonso; Malcolm A Latorre; Nathanael Göransson; Peter Zsigmond; Karin Wårdell
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-09-07

10.  Electric Field Comparison between Microelectrode Recording and Deep Brain Stimulation Systems-A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Fabiola Alonso; Dorian Vogel; Johannes Johansson; Karin Wårdell; Simone Hemm
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.