BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode impedance is a major determinant of current delivery to target tissues, but long-term variation in impedance has received little attention. OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between electrode impedance and time in a large DBS patient population and characterize the relationship between contact activity and impedance. METHODS: We collected retrospective impedance and programming data from 128 electrodes in 84 patients with Parkinson's disease, essential tremor or dystonia. Effects of time, contact activity, stimulation voltage and other parameters on impedance were assessed. We also examined impedance changes following contact activation and deactivation. RESULTS: Impedance decreased by 73 Ω/year (p < 0.001), with 72% of contacts following a downward trend. Impedance was on average 163 Ω lower in active contacts (p < 0.001). Contact activation and inactivation were associated with a more (p < 0.001) and less (p = 0.016) rapid decline in impedance, respectively. Higher stimulation voltages were associated with lower impedance values (p < 0.001). Contact number and electrode model were also significant predictors of impedance. CONCLUSIONS: Impedance decreases gradually in a stimulation-dependent manner. These trends have implications for long-term programming, the development of a closed-loop DBS device and current understanding of the electrode-tissue interface.
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode impedance is a major determinant of current delivery to target tissues, but long-term variation in impedance has received little attention. OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between electrode impedance and time in a large DBS patient population and characterize the relationship between contact activity and impedance. METHODS: We collected retrospective impedance and programming data from 128 electrodes in 84 patients with Parkinson's disease, essential tremor or dystonia. Effects of time, contact activity, stimulation voltage and other parameters on impedance were assessed. We also examined impedance changes following contact activation and deactivation. RESULTS: Impedance decreased by 73 Ω/year (p < 0.001), with 72% of contacts following a downward trend. Impedance was on average 163 Ω lower in active contacts (p < 0.001). Contact activation and inactivation were associated with a more (p < 0.001) and less (p = 0.016) rapid decline in impedance, respectively. Higher stimulation voltages were associated with lower impedance values (p < 0.001). Contact number and electrode model were also significant predictors of impedance. CONCLUSIONS: Impedance decreases gradually in a stimulation-dependent manner. These trends have implications for long-term programming, the development of a closed-loop DBS device and current understanding of the electrode-tissue interface.
Authors: C Haberler; F Alesch; P R Mazal; P Pilz; K Jellinger; M M Pinter; J A Hainfellner; H Budka Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Scott F Lempka; Svjetlana Miocinovic; Matthew D Johnson; Jerrold L Vitek; Cameron C McIntyre Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2009-06-03 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Scott F Lempka; Matthew D Johnson; Svjetlana Miocinovic; Jerrold L Vitek; Cameron C McIntyre Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Gordon Duffley; Johannes Vorwerk; Alan D Dorval; Christopher R Butson Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Joshua K Wong; Christopher W Hess; Leonardo Almeida; Erik H Middlebrooks; Evangelos A Christou; Erin E Patrick; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun Journal: Expert Rev Neurother Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 4.618
Authors: Chet Preston; Alexander M Alvarez; Andres Barragan; Jennifer Becker; Willard S Kasoff; Russell S Witte Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Karl A Sillay; Solomon Ondoma; Brett Wingeier; Dominic Schomberg; Priyanka Sharma; Rahul Kumar; Gurwattan S Miranpuri; Justin Williams Journal: Ann Neurosci Date: 2019-01-14