PURPOSE: Increases in throughput and affordability of genotyping products have led to large sample sizes in genetic studies, increasing the likelihood that incidental genetic findings may occur. We set out to survey potential notifiable variants on arrays used in genome-wide association studies and in direct-to-consumer genetic services. METHODS: We used multiple bioinformatics strategies to identify, and map variants tested for genetic disorders in > or = 2 CLIA-approved laboratories (based on the GeneTests database). We subsequently surveyed 18 commercial single nucleotide polymorphism arrays and HapMap for these variants. RESULTS: Of 1,362 genes tested according to GeneTests, we identified 298 specific targeted mutations measured in more than or equal to two laboratories, encompassing 56 disorders. Only 88 of 298 mutations could be identified as known single nucleotide polymorphisms in genomic databases. We found 18 of 88 single nucleotide polymorphisms present in HapMap or on commercial single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Homozygotes for rare alleles of some variants were identified in the Framingham Heart Study, an active genome-wide association studies cohort (n = 8,410). CONCLUSIONS: Variants in genes including APOE, F5, HFE, CYP21A2, MEFV, SPINK1, BTD, GALT, and G6PD were found on single nucleotide polymorphism arrays or in the HapMap. Some of these variants may warrant further review to determine their likelihood to trigger incidental findings in the course of genome-wide association studies or direct-to-consumer testing.
PURPOSE: Increases in throughput and affordability of genotyping products have led to large sample sizes in genetic studies, increasing the likelihood that incidental genetic findings may occur. We set out to survey potential notifiable variants on arrays used in genome-wide association studies and in direct-to-consumer genetic services. METHODS: We used multiple bioinformatics strategies to identify, and map variants tested for genetic disorders in > or = 2 CLIA-approved laboratories (based on the GeneTests database). We subsequently surveyed 18 commercial single nucleotide polymorphism arrays and HapMap for these variants. RESULTS: Of 1,362 genes tested according to GeneTests, we identified 298 specific targeted mutations measured in more than or equal to two laboratories, encompassing 56 disorders. Only 88 of 298 mutations could be identified as known single nucleotide polymorphisms in genomic databases. We found 18 of 88 single nucleotide polymorphisms present in HapMap or on commercial single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Homozygotes for rare alleles of some variants were identified in the Framingham Heart Study, an active genome-wide association studies cohort (n = 8,410). CONCLUSIONS: Variants in genes including APOE, F5, HFE, CYP21A2, MEFV, SPINK1, BTD, GALT, and G6PD were found on single nucleotide polymorphism arrays or in the HapMap. Some of these variants may warrant further review to determine their likelihood to trigger incidental findings in the course of genome-wide association studies or direct-to-consumer testing.
Authors: A Cecile J W Janssens; Marta Gwinn; Linda A Bradley; Ben A Oostra; Cornelia M van Duijn; Muin J Khoury Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Andrew D Johnson; Robert E Handsaker; Sara L Pulit; Marcia M Nizzari; Christopher J O'Donnell; Paul I W de Bakker Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2008-10-30 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: C Cazeneuve; T Sarkisian; C Pêcheux; M Dervichian; B Nédelec; P Reinert; A Ayvazyan; J C Kouyoumdjian; H Ajrapetyan; M Delpech; M Goossens; C Dodé; G Grateau; S Amselem Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Paul C Adams; David M Reboussin; James C Barton; Christine E McLaren; John H Eckfeldt; Gordon D McLaren; Fitzroy W Dawkins; Ronald T Acton; Emily L Harris; Victor R Gordeuk; Catherine Leiendecker-Foster; Mark Speechley; Beverly M Snively; Joan L Holup; Elizabeth Thomson; Phyliss Sholinsky Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-04-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christopher A Cassa; Sarah K Savage; Patrick L Taylor; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire; Kenneth D Mandl Journal: Genome Res Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Matthew T Oetjens; William S Bush; Joshua C Denny; Kelly Birdwell; Nuri Kodaman; Anurag Verma; Holli H Dilks; Sarah A Pendergrass; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dana C Crawford Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Christian M Simon; Janet K Williams; Laura Shinkunas; Debra Brandt; Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Martha Driessnack Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Charlotte Andersson; Andrew D Johnson; Emelia J Benjamin; Daniel Levy; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Philip M Boone; Zachry T Soens; Ian M Campbell; Pawel Stankiewicz; Sau Wai Cheung; Ankita Patel; Arthur L Beaudet; Sharon E Plon; Chad A Shaw; Amy L McGuire; James R Lupski Journal: Genet Med Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Stephanie M Fullerton; Wendy A Wolf; Kyle B Brothers; Ellen Wright Clayton; Dana C Crawford; Joshua C Denny; Philip Greenland; Barbara A Koenig; Kathleen A Leppig; Noralane M Lindor; Catherine A McCarty; Amy L McGuire; Eugenia R McPeek Hinz; Daniel B Mirel; Erin M Ramos; Marylyn D Ritchie; Maureen E Smith; Carol J Waudby; Wylie Burke; Gail P Jarvik Journal: Genet Med Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 8.822