Literature DB >> 20556870

CLIA-tested genetic variants on commercial SNP arrays: potential for incidental findings in genome-wide association studies.

Andrew D Johnson1, Anupama Bhimavarapu, Emelia J Benjamin, Caroline Fox, Daniel Levy, Gail P Jarvik, Christopher J O'Donnell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Increases in throughput and affordability of genotyping products have led to large sample sizes in genetic studies, increasing the likelihood that incidental genetic findings may occur. We set out to survey potential notifiable variants on arrays used in genome-wide association studies and in direct-to-consumer genetic services.
METHODS: We used multiple bioinformatics strategies to identify, and map variants tested for genetic disorders in > or = 2 CLIA-approved laboratories (based on the GeneTests database). We subsequently surveyed 18 commercial single nucleotide polymorphism arrays and HapMap for these variants.
RESULTS: Of 1,362 genes tested according to GeneTests, we identified 298 specific targeted mutations measured in more than or equal to two laboratories, encompassing 56 disorders. Only 88 of 298 mutations could be identified as known single nucleotide polymorphisms in genomic databases. We found 18 of 88 single nucleotide polymorphisms present in HapMap or on commercial single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Homozygotes for rare alleles of some variants were identified in the Framingham Heart Study, an active genome-wide association studies cohort (n = 8,410).
CONCLUSIONS: Variants in genes including APOE, F5, HFE, CYP21A2, MEFV, SPINK1, BTD, GALT, and G6PD were found on single nucleotide polymorphism arrays or in the HapMap. Some of these variants may warrant further review to determine their likelihood to trigger incidental findings in the course of genome-wide association studies or direct-to-consumer testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20556870      PMCID: PMC3056880          DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181e1e2a9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  36 in total

1.  An approach to longitudinal studies in a community: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  T R DAWBER; W B KANNEL; L P LYELL
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1963-05-22       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions.

Authors:  A Cecile J W Janssens; Marta Gwinn; Linda A Bradley; Ben A Oostra; Cornelia M van Duijn; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  SNAP: a web-based tool for identification and annotation of proxy SNPs using HapMap.

Authors:  Andrew D Johnson; Robert E Handsaker; Sara L Pulit; Marcia M Nizzari; Christopher J O'Donnell; Paul I W de Bakker
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Both mutations in G6PD A- are necessary to produce the G6PD deficient phenotype.

Authors:  M Town; J M Bautista; P J Mason; L Luzzatto
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Keeping pace with the times--the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008.

Authors:  Kathy L Hudson; M K Holohan; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  MEFV-Gene analysis in armenian patients with Familial Mediterranean fever: diagnostic value and unfavorable renal prognosis of the M694V homozygous genotype-genetic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  C Cazeneuve; T Sarkisian; C Pêcheux; M Dervichian; B Nédelec; P Reinert; A Ayvazyan; J C Kouyoumdjian; H Ajrapetyan; M Delpech; M Goossens; C Dodé; G Grateau; S Amselem
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 7.  Clinical utility of factor V leiden (R506Q) testing for the diagnosis and management of thromboembolic disorders.

Authors:  Richard D Press; Kenneth A Bauer; Jody L Kujovich; John A Heit
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Hemochromatosis and iron-overload screening in a racially diverse population.

Authors:  Paul C Adams; David M Reboussin; James C Barton; Christine E McLaren; John H Eckfeldt; Gordon D McLaren; Fitzroy W Dawkins; Ronald T Acton; Emily L Harris; Victor R Gordeuk; Catherine Leiendecker-Foster; Mark Speechley; Beverly M Snively; Joan L Holup; Elizabeth Thomson; Phyliss Sholinsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Not all amino acid substitutions of the common cluster E6 mutation in CYP21 cause congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Tiina Robins; Michela Barbaro; Svetlana Lajic; Anna Wedell
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-12-28       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

View more
  14 in total

1.  Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.

Authors:  Christopher A Cassa; Sarah K Savage; Patrick L Taylor; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Three clinical experiences with SNP array results consistent with parental incest: a narrative with lessons learned.

Authors:  Benjamin M Helm; Katherine Langley; Brooke Spangler; Samantha Vergano
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  An extended IUPAC nomenclature code for polymorphic nucleic acids.

Authors:  Andrew D Johnson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance.

Authors:  Christian Simon; Laura A Shinkunas; Debra Brandt; Janet K Williams
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Evidence for extensive pleiotropy among pharmacogenes.

Authors:  Matthew T Oetjens; William S Bush; Joshua C Denny; Kelly Birdwell; Nuri Kodaman; Anurag Verma; Holli H Dilks; Sarah A Pendergrass; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dana C Crawford
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Informed consent and genomic incidental findings: IRB chair perspectives.

Authors:  Christian M Simon; Janet K Williams; Laura Shinkunas; Debra Brandt; Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Martha Driessnack
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 7.  70-year legacy of the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Charlotte Andersson; Andrew D Johnson; Emelia J Benjamin; Daniel Levy; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Public attitudes toward ancillary information revealed by pharmacogenetic testing under limited information conditions.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Julianne M O'Daniel; Genevieve M Tindall; Isaac R Lipkus; Robert Agans
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Incidental copy-number variants identified by routine genome testing in a clinical population.

Authors:  Philip M Boone; Zachry T Soens; Ian M Campbell; Pawel Stankiewicz; Sau Wai Cheung; Ankita Patel; Arthur L Beaudet; Sharon E Plon; Chad A Shaw; Amy L McGuire; James R Lupski
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network.

Authors:  Stephanie M Fullerton; Wendy A Wolf; Kyle B Brothers; Ellen Wright Clayton; Dana C Crawford; Joshua C Denny; Philip Greenland; Barbara A Koenig; Kathleen A Leppig; Noralane M Lindor; Catherine A McCarty; Amy L McGuire; Eugenia R McPeek Hinz; Daniel B Mirel; Erin M Ramos; Marylyn D Ritchie; Maureen E Smith; Carol J Waudby; Wylie Burke; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.