Literature DB >> 27662181

Enhancing Virtual Screening Performance of Protein Kinases with Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Tavina L Offutt1, Robert V Swift1, Rommie E Amaro1.   

Abstract

In silico virtual screening (VS) is a powerful hit identification technique used in drug discovery projects that aims to effectively distinguish true actives from inactive or decoy molecules. To better capture the dynamic behavior of protein drug targets, compound databases may be screened against an ensemble of protein conformations, which may be experimentally determined or generated computationally, i.e. via molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Several studies have shown that conformations generated by MD are useful in identifying novel hit compounds, in part because structural rearrangements sampled during MD can provide novel targetable areas. However, it remains difficult to predict a priori when an MD conformation will outperform a VS against the crystal structure alone. Here, we assess whether MD conformations result in improved VS performance for six protein kinases. MD conformations are selected using three different methods, and their VS performances are compared to the corresponding crystal structures. Additionally, these conformations are used to train ensembles, and their VS performance is compared to the individual MD conformations and the corresponding crystal structures using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) metrics. We show that performing MD results in at least one conformation that offers better VS performance than the crystal structure, and that, while it is possible to train ensembles to outperform the crystal structure alone, the extent of this enhancement is target dependent. Lastly, we show that the optimal structural selection method is also target dependent and recommend optimizing virtual screens on a kinase-by-kinase basis to improve the likelihood of success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27662181      PMCID: PMC5323360          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  75 in total

1.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

2.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the OPLS Force Field.

Authors:  Devleena Shivakumar; Joshua Williams; Yujie Wu; Wolfgang Damm; John Shelley; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

5.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins.

Authors:  H Frauenfelder; S G Sligar; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  FDA-approved small-molecule kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Peng Wu; Thomas E Nielsen; Mads H Clausen
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 14.819

7.  Novel naphthalene-based inhibitors of Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing ligase 1.

Authors:  Jacob D Durrant; Laurence Hall; Robert V Swift; Melissa Landon; Achim Schnaufer; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-08-24

Review 8.  New anti-inflammatory targets for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Peter J Barnes
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 84.694

9.  POVME 2.0: An Enhanced Tool for Determining Pocket Shape and Volume Characteristics.

Authors:  Jacob D Durrant; Lane Votapka; Jesper Sørensen; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles.

Authors:  Robert V Swift; Siti A Jusoh; Tavina L Offutt; Eric S Li; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  7 in total

1.  Elucidating the inhibition of peptidoglycan biosynthesis in Staphylococcus aureus by albocycline, a macrolactone isolated from Streptomyces maizeus.

Authors:  Hai Liang; Guangfeng Zhou; Yunhui Ge; Elizabeth A D'Ambrosio; Tess M Eidem; Catlyn Blanchard; Cindy Shehatou; Vijay K Chatare; Paul M Dunman; Ann M Valentine; Vincent A Voelz; Catherine L Grimes; Rodrigo B Andrade
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Efficiency of Stratification for Ensemble Docking Using Reduced Ensembles.

Authors:  Bing Xie; John D Clark; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Decrypting a Cryptic Allosteric Pocket in H. pylori Glutamate Racemase.

Authors:  Pratik Rajesh Chheda; Grant T Cooling; Sondra F Dean; Jonah Propp; Kathryn F Hobbs; M Ashley Spies
Journal:  Commun Chem       Date:  2021-12-10

4.  The structural heterogeneity of α-synuclein is governed by several distinct subpopulations with interconversion times slower than milliseconds.

Authors:  Jiaxing Chen; Sofia Zaer; Paz Drori; Joanna Zamel; Khalil Joron; Nir Kalisman; Eitan Lerner; Nikolay V Dokholyan
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.871

5.  Dynamic Role of the G Protein in Stabilizing the Active State of the Adenosine A2A Receptor.

Authors:  Sangbae Lee; Anita K Nivedha; Christopher G Tate; Nagarajan Vaidehi
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Molecular modeling simulation studies reveal new potential inhibitors against HPV E6 protein.

Authors:  Joel Ricci-López; Abraham Vidal-Limon; Matías Zunñiga; Verónica A Jimènez; Joel B Alderete; Carlos A Brizuela; Sergio Aguila
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Benchmarking ensemble docking methods in D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Jessie Low Gan; Dhruv Kumar; Cynthia Chen; Bryn C Taylor; Benjamin R Jagger; Rommie E Amaro; Christopher T Lee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.686

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.