Literature DB >> 30114370

Efficiency of Stratification for Ensemble Docking Using Reduced Ensembles.

Bing Xie1, John D Clark1, David D L Minh1.   

Abstract

Molecular docking can account for receptor flexibility by combining the docking score over multiple rigid receptor conformations, such as snapshots from a molecular dynamics simulation. Here, we evaluate a number of common snapshot selection strategies using a quality metric from stratified sampling, the efficiency of stratification, which compares the variance of a selection strategy to simple random sampling. We also extend the metric to estimators of exponential averages (which involve an exponential transformation, averaging, and inverse transformation) and minima. For docking sets of over 500 ligands to four different proteins of varying flexibility, we observe that, for estimating ensemble averages and exponential averages, many clustering algorithms have similar performance trends: for a few snapshots (less than 25), medoids are the most efficient, while, for a larger number, optimal (the allocation that minimizes the variance) and proportional (to the size of each cluster) allocation become more efficient. Proportional allocation appears to be the most consistently efficient for estimating minima.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30114370      PMCID: PMC6338335          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  51 in total

1.  Computational drug design accommodating receptor flexibility: the relaxed complex scheme.

Authors:  Jung-Hsin Lin; Alexander L Perryman; Julie R Schames; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-05-22       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 2.  Force fields for protein simulations.

Authors:  Jay W Ponder; David A Case
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2003

3.  PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations.

Authors:  Todd J Dolinsky; Jens E Nielsen; J Andrew McCammon; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Pocket-space maps to identify novel binding-site conformations in proteins.

Authors:  Ian R Craig; Christopher Pfleger; Holger Gohlke; Jonathan W Essex; Katrin Spiegel
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Modeling Binding with Large Conformational Changes: Key Points in Ensemble-Docking Approaches.

Authors:  Stefano Motta; Laura Bonati
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Accelerated structure-based design of chemically diverse allosteric modulators of a muscarinic G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Yinglong Miao; Dahlia Anne Goldfeld; Ee Von Moo; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos; J Andrew McCammon; Celine Valant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Implicit ligand theory for relative binding free energies.

Authors:  Trung Hai Nguyen; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Significant enhancement of docking sensitivity using implicit ligand sampling.

Authors:  Mengang Xu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Inexpensive Method for Selecting Receptor Structures for Virtual Screening.

Authors:  Zunnan Huang; Chung F Wong
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  POVME 2.0: An Enhanced Tool for Determining Pocket Shape and Volume Characteristics.

Authors:  Jacob D Durrant; Lane Votapka; Jesper Sørensen; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  1 in total

1.  Benchmarking ensemble docking methods in D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Jessie Low Gan; Dhruv Kumar; Cynthia Chen; Bryn C Taylor; Benjamin R Jagger; Rommie E Amaro; Christopher T Lee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.686

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.