Literature DB >> 22144384

Positive feedback and alternative stable states in inbreeding, cooperation, sex roles and other evolutionary processes.

Jussi Lehtonen1, Hanna Kokko.   

Abstract

A large proportion of studies in systems science focus on processes involving a mixture of positive and negative feedbacks, which are also common themes in evolutionary ecology. Examples of negative feedback are density dependence (population regulation) and frequency-dependent selection (polymorphisms). Positive feedback, in turn, plays a role in Fisherian 'runaway' sexual selection, the evolution of cooperation, selfing and inbreeding tolerance under purging of deleterious alleles, and the evolution of sex differences in parental care. All these examples feature self-reinforcing processes where the increase in the value of a trait selects for further increases, sometimes via a coevolutionary feedback loop with another trait. Positive feedback often leads to alternative stable states (evolutionary endpoints), making the interpretation of evolutionary predictions challenging. Here, we discuss conceptual issues such as the relationship between self-reinforcing selection and disruptive selection. We also present an extension of a previous model on parental care, focusing on the relationship between the operational sex ratio and sexual selection, and the influence of this relationship on the evolution of biparental or uniparental care.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22144384      PMCID: PMC3223802          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  63 in total

1.  Multiple patterns of parental care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Sympatric speciation by sexual selection.

Authors:  M Higashi; G Takimoto; N Yamamura
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Dispersal and Inbreeding Avoidance.

Authors:  Nicolas Perrin; Vladimir Mazalov
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-02

5.  Runaway sexual selection when female preferences are directly selected.

Authors:  D W Hall; M Kirkpatrick; B West
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Partnership.

Authors:  I Eshel; A Shaked
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-02-21       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation.

Authors:  H Kokko; R A Johnstone; T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  21 in total

1.  Predictive ecology: systems approaches.

Authors:  Matthew R Evans; Ken J Norris; Tim G Benton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  A hierarchical model of the evolution of human brain specializations.

Authors:  H Clark Barrett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The evolution of parental cooperation in birds.

Authors:  Vladimír Remeš; Robert P Freckleton; Jácint Tökölyi; András Liker; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sex roles and the evolution of parental care specialization.

Authors:  Jonathan M Henshaw; Lutz Fromhage; Adam G Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The evolution of early-life effects on social behaviour-why should social adversity carry over to the future?

Authors:  Bram Kuijper; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Sexual conflict and the evolution of asexuality at low population densities.

Authors:  Nina Gerber; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Inbreeding and the evolution of sociality in arthropods.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Tabadkani; Jamasb Nozari; Mathieu Lihoreau
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-08-23

8.  The hawk-dove game in a sexually reproducing species explains a colourful polymorphism of an endangered bird.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Simon C Griffith; Sarah R Pryke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Give one species the task to come up with a theory that spans them all: what good can come out of that?

Authors:  Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Host behaviour-parasite feedback: an essential link between animal behaviour and disease ecology.

Authors:  Vanessa O Ezenwa; Elizabeth A Archie; Meggan E Craft; Dana M Hawley; Lynn B Martin; Janice Moore; Lauren White
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.