Literature DB >> 10506544

Dispersal and Inbreeding Avoidance.

Nicolas Perrin, Vladimir Mazalov.   

Abstract

Using a game-theoretical approach, we investigate the dispersal patterns expected if inbreeding avoidance were the only reason for dispersal. The evolutionary outcome is always complete philopatry by one sex. The rate of dispersal by the other sex depends on patch size and mating system, as well as inbreeding and dispersal costs. If such costs are sex independent, then two stable equilibria coexist (male or female philopatry), with symmetric domains of attraction. Which sex disperses is determined entirely by history, genetic drift, and gene flow. An asymmetry in costs makes one domain of attraction extend at the expense of the other. In such a case, the dispersing sex might also be, paradoxically, the one that incurs the higher dispersal costs. As asymmetry increases, one equilibrium eventually disappears, which may result in a sudden evolutionary shift in the identity of the dispersing sex. Our results underline the necessity to control for phylogenetic relationships (e.g., through the use of independent-comparisons methods) when investigating empirical trends in dispersal. Our model also makes quantitative predictions on the rate of dispersal by the dispersing sex and suggests that inbreeding avoidance may only rarely be the sole reason for dispersal.

Keywords:  evolutionarily stable strategy; mating systems; polygyny; sex‐biased dispersal

Year:  1999        PMID: 10506544     DOI: 10.1086/303236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  40 in total

1.  Does reduced heterozygosity influence dispersal? A test using spatially structured populations in an alpine ungulate.

Authors:  Aaron B A Shafer; Jocelyn Poissant; Steeve D Côté; David W Coltman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Low propensity for aerial dispersal in specialist spiders from fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  Dries Bonte; Nele Vandenbroecke; Luc Lens; Jean-Pierre Maelfait
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Dispersal range analysis: quantifying individual variation in dispersal behaviour.

Authors:  Erik D Doerr; Veronica A J Doerr
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Positive feedback and alternative stable states in inbreeding, cooperation, sex roles and other evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Risky movement increases the rate of range expansion.

Authors:  K A Bartoń; T Hovestadt; B L Phillips; J M J Travis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Joint evolution of dispersal and inbreeding load.

Authors:  Frédéric Guillaume; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Dispersal is not female biased in a resource-defence mating ungulate, the European roe deer.

Authors:  A Coulon; J-F Cosson; N Morellet; J-M Angibault; B Cargnelutti; M Galan; S Aulagnier; A J M Hewison
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  An empiricist's guide to theoretical predictions on the evolution of dispersal.

Authors:  Anne Duputié; François Massol
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 9.  Give one species the task to come up with a theory that spans them all: what good can come out of that?

Authors:  Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Deriving dispersal distances from genetic data.

Authors:  G Spong; S Creel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.