Literature DB >> 10591210

Sympatric speciation by sexual selection.

M Higashi1, G Takimoto, N Yamamura.   

Abstract

There is increasing evidence for the process of sympatric speciation, in which reproductive isolation of species occurs without physical isolation. Theoretical models have focused on disruptive natural selection as the crucial pressure for splitting a species. Here we report the theoretical finding that sympatric speciation may be caused by sexual selection even without disruptive natural selection. Specifically, we show that variation in a male secondary sexual character with two conspicuous extremes and the corresponding variance in female mating preference around no preference may jointly evolve into bimodal distributions with increasing modal divergence of the male and female traits, pulling a population apart into two prezygotically isolated populations. This mode of speciation, driven by two runaway processes in different directions, is promoted by an increase in the efficiency of females in discriminating among males or a decrease in the cost of male conspicuousness, indicating that sympatric speciation may occur more readily if barrier-free or predator-free conditions arise. Although even a slight cost of female preference would cancel the runaway process of sexual selection, it would not cancel the divergent runaway processes of sympatric speciation.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10591210     DOI: 10.1038/990087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  58 in total

1.  Invasion of vacant niches and subsequent sympatric speciation.

Authors:  Masakado Kawata
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic population structure indicates sympatric speciation of Lake Malawi pelagic cichlids.

Authors:  P W Shaw; G F Turner; M R Idid; R L Robinson; G R Carvalho
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sympatric speciation through intraspecific social parasitism.

Authors:  Riitta Savolainen; Kari Vepsalainen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sympatric speciation as a consequence of male pregnancy in seahorses.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Glenn I Moore; Charlotta Kvarnemo; DeEtte Walker; John C Avise
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in birds.

Authors:  Edward H Morrow; Trevor E Pitcher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders.

Authors:  Matthew J G Gage; Geoffrey A Parker; Soren Nylin; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict.

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets; David Waxman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Laboratory mating trials indicate incipient speciation by sexual selection among populations of the cichlid fish Pseudotropheus zebra from Lake Malawi.

Authors:  Mairi E Knight; George F Turner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Scott L Nuismer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Male-male competition and nuptial-colour displacement as a diversifying force in Lake Victoria cichlid fishes.

Authors:  Ole Seehausen; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.