Literature DB >> 11222050

Partnership.

I Eshel1, A Shaked.   

Abstract

Individuals are called partners when it is in their best interest to help each other, if by doing so they increase the probability of being together in the future when, for similar reasons, they will continue to help each other. Kinsmen or individuals who often face (hedonic) situations in which helping is the dominating strategy are committed to help each other. Partnership may develop among them since the loss of the other means the loss of a guaranteed helper. Thus, they may be willing to take additional risks to help each other. Partnership may occur among unrelated individuals and with no hedonic situations. Partnership creates bonds between partners which may be much stronger than those between kinsmen; an individual may take more risks for his partner than he will ever take for a kin. Partnership may evolve without the sophistication and memory required for reciprocation altruism. Although kin selection, partnership and reciprocation are likely to appear fused as the causes for altruism, we argue that it may be possible to distinguish between them in some situations. We show that as the partners get older partnership may become less important to them. We also show that like cooperation, and for analogous reasons, malice may evolve among partners so that each will be willing to take additional risks in order to eliminate the other. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11222050     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  12 in total

1.  Positive feedback and alternative stable states in inbreeding, cooperation, sex roles and other evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Why mutual helping in most natural systems is neither conflict-free nor based on maximal conflict.

Authors:  Redouan Bshary; Klaus Zuberbühler; Carel P van Schaik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation.

Authors:  Michael Taborsky; Joachim G Frommen; Christina Riehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Cooperation and the common good.

Authors:  Rufus A Johnstone; António M M Rodrigues
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Models of social evolution: can we do better to predict 'who helps whom to achieve what'?

Authors:  António M M Rodrigues; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Migration and the evolution of duetting in songbirds.

Authors:  David M Logue; Michelle L Hall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Reciprocity creates a stake in one's partner, or why you should cooperate even when anonymous.

Authors:  Pat Barclay
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The emergence of cooperation by evolutionary generalization.

Authors:  Félix Geoffroy; Jean-Baptiste André
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.530

Review 9.  Helping in humans and other animals: a fruitful interdisciplinary dialogue.

Authors:  Redouan Bshary; Nichola J Raihani
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Higher social tolerance in wild versus captive common marmosets: the role of interdependence.

Authors:  Francisco Edvaldo de Oliveira Terceiro; Maria de Fátima Arruda; Carel P van Schaik; Arrilton Araújo; Judith Maria Burkart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.