Literature DB >> 20601717

What the experimenter's prime tells the observer's brain.

Geoff G Cole1, Gustav Kuhn.   

Abstract

The presentation of a stimulus below the threshold of conscious awareness can exert an influence on the processing of a subsequent target. One such consequence of briefly presented "primes" is seen in the negative compatibility effect. The response time (RT) to determine the left-right orientation of an arrow (i.e., the target) is relatively slow if a prime is also an arrow whose direction corresponds to that of the target. When the direction of the arrow is opposite that of the prime, RTs are relatively fast. In four experiments, we examined whether the prime shifts attention from the location of the subsequent target and whether this attention shift influences target processing. Results showed that the prime does indeed move attention. The consequence of this attention movement is that the representation of direction is affected. Specifically, RTs to process an arrow are shorter if the arrow's direction is compatible with the last shift of attention. Furthermore, this interference occurs at a conceptual level concerning the representation of left and right rather than at the motor planning level. We argue that a shift in attention brought about by the prime can create a negative compatibility-like effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20601717     DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  10 in total

1.  Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return?

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Paul A Skarratt; Rebeccah-Claire Billing
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Response priming with apparent motion primes.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-20

3.  Action or attention in social inhibition of return?

Authors:  Silviya P Doneva; Mark A Atkinson; Paul A Skarratt; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-12-26

4.  On the nature of the delayed "inhibitory" cueing effects generated by uninformative arrows at fixation.

Authors:  Matthew D Hilchey; Jason Satel; Jason Ivanoff; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

5.  A subliminal inhibitory mechanism for the negative compatibility effect: a continuous versus threshold mechanism.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Xuhai Chen; Dongyang Dai; Yongchun Wang; Yonghui Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Response priming with motion primes: negative compatibility or congruency effects, even in free-choice trials.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger; Ryan P Hackländer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-02-24

7.  Visual cognition during real social interaction.

Authors:  Paul A Skarratt; Geoff G Cole; Gustav Kuhn
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  When your decisions are not (quite) your own: action observation influences free choices.

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Damien Wright; Silviya P Doneva; Paul A Skarratt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reduction of the spatial stroop effect by peripheral cueing as a function of the presence/absence of placeholders.

Authors:  Chunming Luo; Juan Lupiáñez; María Jesús Funes; Xiaolan Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Activation, Inhibition, or Something Else: An Exploratory Study on Response Priming Using Moving Dots as Primes in Middle-Aged and Old Adults.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger; Cathleen Kappes
Journal:  J Aging Res       Date:  2018-06-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.