Literature DB >> 19028469

Does Joe influence Fred's action? Not if Fred has autism spectrum disorder.

Timothy N Welsh1, Matthew C Ray, Daniel J Weeks, Deborah Dewey, Digby Elliott.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that the deficits in social interaction seen in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) arise from problems in action perception stemming from a dysfunction of the mirror neuron system (MNS)--a neural network that becomes active during the performance and observation of action. A dysfunction of this system could have a cascading effect leading to deficits in social cognition because poor activation of the MNS during action observation may lead to an incomplete understanding of another person's actions, intentions and, ultimately, mental states. The present study tested the MNS dysfunction explanation by determining if people with ASD demonstrate a between-person inhibition of return (BP-IOR) effect. The BP-IOR effect, longer reaction times to targets presented at the location of another person's previous response relative to an unresponded-to location, has been hypothesized to be the result of the MNS co-representing the observed response and subsequently activating the mechanisms that cause IOR when individuals respond on their own (within-person IOR [WP-IOR]). Consistent with the MNS dysfunction hypothesis, participants with ASD did not demonstrate a BP-IOR effect in a condition in which they only observed the movement of the partner. The participants with ASD did demonstrate a WP-IOR effect suggesting that the mechanisms underlying IOR are intact in ASD. The contrast between the BP- and WP-IOR effects in the participants with ASD provides significant behavioural evidence for MNS dysfunction in ASD and has important implications for understanding this disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19028469     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.10.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  9 in total

1.  Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return?

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Paul A Skarratt; Rebeccah-Claire Billing
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Action or attention in social inhibition of return?

Authors:  Silviya P Doneva; Mark A Atkinson; Paul A Skarratt; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-12-26

Review 3.  Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting.

Authors:  Mark A Atkinson; Andrew A Simpson; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

4.  Action co-representation and social exclusion.

Authors:  Marcello Costantini; Francesca Ferri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Response-specific effects in a joint action task: social inhibition of return effects do not emerge when observed and executed actions are different.

Authors:  Joseph Manzone; Geoff G Cole; Paul A Skarratt; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-08-16

6.  Between-person effects on attention and action: Joe and Fred revisited.

Authors:  Spencer J Hayes; Steve Hansen; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-07-15

7.  Altered social attention in anorexia nervosa during real social interaction.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Luigi Castelli; Pietro Scatturin; Lorenza Carli; Patrizia Todisco; Daniela Palomba; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The Gambler's Fallacy: A Basic Inhibitory Process?

Authors:  James Lyons; Daniel J Weeks; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-20

9.  The role of attention in a joint-action effect.

Authors:  Silviya P Doneva; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.