Literature DB >> 11548033

On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.

J Lupiáñez1, B Milliken, C Solano, B Weaver, S P Tipper.   

Abstract

In studies of exogenous attentional orienting, response times for targets at previously cued locations are often longer than those for targets at previously uncued locations. This effect is known widely as inhibition of return (IOR). There has been debate as to whether IOR can be observed in discrimination as well as detection tasks. The experiments reported here confirm that IOR can be observed when target discrimination is required and that the cue-target interval at which IOR is observed is often longer in discrimination than in detection tasks. The results also demonstrate that the later emergence of IOR is related to perceptual discrimination rather than to response selection differences between discrimination and detection tasks. More difficult discrimination tasks lengthen the SOA at which IOR emerges. In contrast, increasing task difficulty by adding a distractor to the location opposite the target shortens the SOA at which IOR emerges. Together, the results reveal an adaptive interaction between exogenous and endogenous attentional systems, in which the action of the orienting (exogenous) system is modulated endogenously in accord with task demands.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11548033     DOI: 10.1080/713755990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  40 in total

1.  Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return?

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Paul A Skarratt; Rebeccah-Claire Billing
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Inhibition of return spreads across 3-D space.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

3.  Stimulus-response probability and inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jason Ivanoff; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

4.  Orienting in space and time: joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.

Authors:  Bruce Milliken; Juan Lupiáñez; Martha Roberts; Biljana Stevanovski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

5.  The manifestation of attentional capture: facilitation or IOR depending on task demands.

Authors:  Juan Lupiáñez; María Ruz; María Jesús Funes; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-07

6.  Inhibition of return and response repetition within and between modalities.

Authors:  Alexa B Roggeveen; David J Prime; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Looking for inhibition of return in pigeons.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Igor Juricevic; Sara J Shettleworth; Jay Pratt; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 8.  How the brain blinks: towards a neurocognitive model of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel; Klaus Kessler; Frank Schmitz; Joachim Gross; Elkan Akyürek; Kimron Shapiro; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-20

9.  Two spatially separated attention systems in the visual field: evidence from inhibition of return.

Authors:  Yan Bao; Ernst Pöppel
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-03

10.  Impaired reflexive orienting to social cues in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Andrea Marotta; Maria Casagrande; Caterina Rosa; Lisa Maccari; Bianca Berloco; Augusto Pasini
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.785

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.