Literature DB >> 22143871

Gaze fixation improves the stability of expert juggling.

Joost C Dessing1, Frédéric P Rey, Peter J Beek.   

Abstract

Novice and expert jugglers employ different visuomotor strategies: whereas novices look at the balls around their zeniths, experts tend to fixate their gaze at a central location within the pattern (so-called gaze-through). A gaze-through strategy may reflect visuomotor parsimony, i.e., the use of simpler visuomotor (oculomotor and/or attentional) strategies as afforded by superior tossing accuracy and error corrections. In addition, the more stable gaze during a gaze-through strategy may result in more accurate movement planning by providing a stable base for gaze-centered neural coding of ball motion and movement plans or for shifts in attention. To determine whether a stable gaze might indeed have such beneficial effects on juggling, we examined juggling variability during 3-ball cascade juggling with and without constrained gaze fixation (at various depths) in expert performers (n = 5). Novice jugglers were included (n = 5) for comparison, even though our predictions pertained specifically to expert juggling. We indeed observed that experts, but not novices, juggled significantly less variable when fixating, compared to unconstrained viewing. Thus, while visuomotor parsimony might still contribute to the emergence of a gaze-through strategy, this study highlights an additional role for improved movement planning. This role may be engendered by gaze-centered coding and/or attentional control mechanisms in the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22143871      PMCID: PMC3268979          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2967-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  48 in total

1.  Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching.

Authors:  Christopher A Buneo; Murray R Jarvis; Aaron P Batista; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Cue reliability and a landmark stability heuristic determine relative weighting between egocentric and allocentric visual information in memory-guided reach.

Authors:  Patrick A Byrne; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Specific increases within global decreases: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of five days of motor sequence learning.

Authors:  Christopher J Steele; Virginia B Penhune
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of correct and transformed visual feedback on rhythmic visuo-motor tracking: tracking performance and visual search behavior.

Authors:  M Roerdink; C E Peper; P J Beek
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Florian Pieper; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Visual occlusion factors in a discrete ball-catching task.

Authors:  H T Whiting; R H Sharp
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Moving attention through visual space.

Authors:  G L Shulman; R W Remington; J P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Looking at the center of the targets helps multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Hilda M Fehd; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Eye movements during multiple object tracking: where do participants look?

Authors:  Hilda M Fehd; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-12-21

10.  Training induces changes in white-matter architecture.

Authors:  Jan Scholz; Miriam C Klein; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-11       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Riemannian Geometry Theory of Synergy Selection for Visually-Guided Movement.

Authors:  Peter D Neilson; Megan D Neilson; Robin T Bye
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25

2.  Visual strategies of young soccer players during a passing test - A pilot study.

Authors:  Pieter Vansteenkiste; Matthieu Lenoir; Izabela Krejtz; Krzysztof Krejtz
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 1.349

3.  The juggling paradigm: a novel social neuroscience approach to identify neuropsychophysiological markers of team mental models.

Authors:  Edson Filho; Maurizio Bertollo; Claudio Robazza; Silvia Comani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-11

4.  Gaze behavior in one-handed catching and its relation with interceptive performance: what the eyes can't tell.

Authors:  Benedetta Cesqui; Maura Mezzetti; Francesco Lacquaniti; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Emergence of perceptuomotor relationships during paleolithic stone toolmaking learning: intersections of observation and practice.

Authors:  Kristel Yu Tiamco Bayani; Nikhilesh Natraj; Nada Khresdish; Justin Pargeter; Dietrich Stout; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-11-11

6.  Hyperbrain features of team mental models within a juggling paradigm: a proof of concept.

Authors:  Edson Filho; Maurizio Bertollo; Gabriella Tamburro; Lorenzo Schinaia; Jonas Chatel-Goldman; Selenia di Fronso; Claudio Robazza; Silvia Comani
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Visual brain plasticity induced by central and peripheral visual field loss.

Authors:  Nicolae Sanda; Leonardo Cerliani; Colas N Authié; Norman Sabbah; José-Alain Sahel; Christophe Habas; Avinoam B Safran; Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.270

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.