Literature DB >> 20465338

Looking at the center of the targets helps multiple object tracking.

Hilda M Fehd1, Adriane E Seiffert.   

Abstract

The ability to move our gaze to locations of interest facilitates interactions in everyday life. Where do participants direct gaze when multiple locations are of interest simultaneously? We previously demonstrated that, when tracking several moving targets amidst distractors in a multiple object tracking (MOT) task, participants primarily looked at a central point in between the targets (H. M. Fehd & A. E. Seiffert, 2008). This strategy of center-looking is in contrast to a target-looking strategy where participants would saccade from target to target. Here we investigated what factors influence the use of center-looking as well as its effectiveness. By decreasing object speed, we determined that center-looking is not a result of avoiding costly eye movements during tracking. Decreasing object size showed that peripheral visibility is necessary for tracking, but that center-looking continues up to the limits of peripheral visibility. Further analysis revealed that participants often engaged in both target-looking and center-looking by switching gaze from the center to targets and back again. Directly comparing participants' performance when they either did or did not include center-looking along with target-looking revealed that center-looking facilitates tracking performance. These results suggest that there is value in looking at the center that relates directly to the process of tracking multiple objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20465338      PMCID: PMC4150652          DOI: 10.1167/10.4.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  45 in total

1.  Multiple-object tracking is based on scene, not retinal, coordinates.

Authors:  Geniva Liu; Erin L Austen; Kellogg S Booth; Brian D Fisher; Ritchie Argue; Mark I Rempel; James T Enns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Spatial memory and saccadic targeting in a natural task.

Authors:  María Pilar Aivar; Mary M Hayhoe; Christopher L Chizk; Ryan E B Mruczek
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Look here but ignore what you see: effects of distractors at fixation.

Authors:  Diane M Beck; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Multiple-target tracking: A role for working memory?

Authors:  Roy Allen; Peter McGeorge; David G Pearson; Alan Milne
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? Tracking as a low-level, non-predictive function.

Authors:  Brian P Keane; Zenon W Pylyshyn
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports.

Authors:  Jukka Hyönä; Anna-Mari Nurminen
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2006-02

Review 8.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

10.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997
View more
  24 in total

1.  Gaze fixation improves the stability of expert juggling.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Frédéric P Rey; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Temporal estimation with two moving objects: overt and covert pursuit.

Authors:  Robin Baurès; Simon J Bennett; Joe Causer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Why do people appear not to extrapolate trajectories during multiple object tracking? A computational investigation.

Authors:  Sheng-Hua Zhong; Zheng Ma; Colin Wilson; Yan Liu; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The neurophysiological index of visual working memory maintenance is not due to load dependent eye movements.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Remapping attention in multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Piers D L Howe; Trafton Drew; Yair Pinto; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Tracking planets and moons: mechanisms of object tracking revealed with a new paradigm.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Multiple Players Tracking in Virtual Reality: Influence of Soccer Specific Trajectories and Relationship With Gaze Activity.

Authors:  Alexandre Vu; Anthony Sorel; Annabelle Limballe; Benoit Bideau; Richard Kulpa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-20

9.  An eye-tracking investigation of intentional motion perception in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Paul Roux; Christine Passerieux; Franck Ramus
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.186

10.  Motion disrupts dynamic visual search for an orientation change.

Authors:  Emily M Crowe; Christina J Howard; Iain D Gilchrist; Christopher Kent
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-06-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.