Literature DB >> 16087264

Effects of correct and transformed visual feedback on rhythmic visuo-motor tracking: tracking performance and visual search behavior.

M Roerdink1, C E Peper, P J Beek.   

Abstract

The effects of correct and transformed visual feedback on rhythmic unimanual visuo-motor tracking were examined, focusing on tracking performance (accuracy and stability) and visual search behavior. Twelve participants (reduced to 9 in the analyses) manually tracked an oscillating visual target signal in phase (by moving the hand in the same direction as the target signal) and in antiphase (by moving the hand in the opposite direction), while the frequency of the target signal was gradually increased to probe pattern stability. Besides a control condition without feedback, correct feedback (representing the actual hand movement) or mirrored feedback (representing the hand movement transformed by 180 degrees) were provided during tracking, resulting in either in-phase or antiphase visual motion of the target and feedback signal, depending on the tracking mode performed. The quality (accuracy and stability) of in-phase tracking was hardly affected by the two forms of feedback, whereas antiphase tracking clearly benefited from mirrored feedback but not from correct feedback. This finding extends previous results indicating that the performance of visuo-motor coordination tasks is aided by visual feedback manipulations resulting in coherently grouped (i.e., in-phase) visual motion structures. Further insights into visuo-motor tracking with and without feedback were garnered from the visual search patterns accompanying task performance. Smooth pursuit eye movements only occurred at lower oscillation frequencies and prevailed during in-phase tracking and when target and feedback signal moved in phase. At higher frequencies, point-of-gaze was fixated at a location that depended on the feedback provided and the resulting visual motion structures. During in-phase tracking the mirrored feedback was ignored, which explains why performance was not affected in this condition. Point-of-gaze fixations at one of the end-points were accompanied by reduced motor variability at this location, reflecting a form of visuo-motor anchoring that may support the pick up of discrete information as well as the control of hand movements to a desired location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16087264     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  20 in total

1.  Gaze fixation improves the stability of expert juggling.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Frédéric P Rey; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vision-to-event and movement-to-event coordination in an unimanual circling task.

Authors:  Sandra Dietrich; Wolfgang Prinz; Martina Rieger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Location but not amount of stimulus occlusion influences the stability of visuo-motor coordination.

Authors:  Alen Hajnal; Michael J Richardson; Steven J Harrison; R C Schmidt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Multilevel coordination stability: integrated goal representations in simultaneous intra-personal and inter-agent coordination.

Authors:  Peter E Keller; Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-05-19

5.  Location but not amount of stimulus occlusion influences the stability of visuomotor coordination.

Authors:  Alen Hajnal; Michael J Richardson; Steven J Harrison; R C Schmidt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006-2012).

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Yi-Huang Su
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

7.  Informational constraints on spontaneous visuomotor entrainment.

Authors:  Manuel Varlet; Colleen Bucci; Michael J Richardson; R C Schmidt
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Influence of stimulus velocity profile on unintentional visuomotor entrainment depends on eye movements.

Authors:  Manuel Varlet; R C Schmidt; Michael J Richardson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Informational and neuromuscular contributions to anchoring in rhythmic wrist cycling.

Authors:  Melvyn Roerdink; Arne Ridderikhoff; C E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Visual and musculoskeletal underpinnings of anchoring in rhythmic visuo-motor tracking.

Authors:  Melvyn Roerdink; Ellen D Ophoff; C Lieke E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.