Literature DB >> 18096148

Eye movements during multiple object tracking: where do participants look?

Hilda M Fehd1, Adriane E Seiffert.   

Abstract

Similar to the eye movements you might make when viewing a sports game, this experiment investigated where participants tend to look while keeping track of multiple objects. While eye movements were recorded, participants tracked either 1 or 3 of 8 red dots that moved randomly within a square box on a black background. Results indicated that participants fixated closer to targets more often than to distractors. However, on 3-target trials, fixation was closer to the center of the triangle formed by the targets more often than to any individual targets. This center-looking strategy seemed to reflect that people were grouping the targets into a single object rather than simultaneously minimizing all target eccentricities. Here we find that observers deliberately focus their eyes on a location that is different from the objects they are attending, perhaps as a consequence of representing those objects as a group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18096148      PMCID: PMC2430980          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  16 in total

1.  Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention.

Authors:  F A Verstraten; P Cavanagh; A T Labianca
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The spatial resolution of visual attention.

Authors:  J Intriligator; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Multielement visual tracking: attention and perceptual organization.

Authors:  S Yantis
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Attentional selection of a peripheral ring overrules the central attentional bias.

Authors:  Karina J Linnell; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-07

5.  Attentional modulation of the gap effect.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Clara M Lajonchere; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Localization of shapes: eye movements and perception compared.

Authors:  Dhanraj Vishwanath; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.

Authors:  Z W Pylyshyn; R W Storm
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1988

8.  Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  B Fischer; B Breitmeyer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Retinal location and its effect on the processing of target and distractor information.

Authors:  P Goolkasian
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Latency for saccadic eye movement.

Authors:  M G Saslow
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1967-08
View more
  38 in total

1.  Gaze fixation improves the stability of expert juggling.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Frédéric P Rey; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Temporal estimation with two moving objects: overt and covert pursuit.

Authors:  Robin Baurès; Simon J Bennett; Joe Causer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Multiple-object tracking and visually guided touch.

Authors:  Mallory E Terry; Lana M Trick
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Changing target trajectories influences tracking performance.

Authors:  Justin M Ericson; Melissa R Beck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

5.  Motion integration for ocular pursuit does not hinder perceptual segregation of moving objects.

Authors:  Zhenlan Jin; Scott N J Watamaniuk; Aarlenne Z Khan; Elena Potapchuk; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Why do people appear not to extrapolate trajectories during multiple object tracking? A computational investigation.

Authors:  Sheng-Hua Zhong; Zheng Ma; Colin Wilson; Yan Liu; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Comparing eye movements during position tracking and identity tracking: No evidence for separate systems.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Remapping attention in multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Piers D L Howe; Trafton Drew; Yair Pinto; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Barrier effects in non-retinotopic feature attribution.

Authors:  Murat Aydın; Michael H Herzog; Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Todd S Horowitz; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.