Literature DB >> 24214365

Sexual selection and physical attractiveness : Implications for mating dynamics.

S W Gangestad1.   

Abstract

Sexual selection processes have received much attention in recent years, attention reflected in interest in human mate preferences. Among these mate preferences are preferences for physical attractiveness. Preferences in and of themselves, however, do not fully explain the nature of the relationships that individuals attain. A tacit negotiation process underlies relationship formation and maintenance. The notion that preferences for physical attractiveness evolved under parasite-driven "good genes" sexual selection leads to predictions about the nature of trade-offs that individuals make between mates' physical attractiveness and investment potential. These predictions and relevant data are explored, with a primary emphasis on women's preferences for men's qualities. In addition, further implications of trade-offs are examined, most notably (a) the impact of environmental variations on the nature of mating and (b) some effects of trade-offs on infidelity and male attempts to control women.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 24214365     DOI: 10.1007/BF02692200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  27 in total

1.  Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments.

Authors:  A P Møller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-05-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Physical attractiveness, romantic love, and equity restoration in dating relationships.

Authors:  J W Critelli; L R Waid
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1980-12

3.  Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation.

Authors:  S W Gangestad; J A Simpson
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  1990-03

5.  SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  THE COST OF DOMINANCE AND ADVANTAGE OF SUBORDINATION IN A BADGE SIGNALING SYSTEM.

Authors:  Sievert Rohwer; Paul W Ewald
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Parental investment, mate choice, and mate quality.

Authors:  N Burley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Dating and physical attractiveness: replication.

Authors:  R W Brislin; S A Lewis
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1968-06

9.  Coevolution of hosts and parasites.

Authors:  R M Anderson; R M May
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.

Authors:  D M Buss; D P Schmitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  11 in total

1.  Mate selection in popular women's fiction.

Authors:  C Whissell
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1996-12

2.  Female coital orgasm and male attractiveness.

Authors:  T K Shackelford; V A Weekes-Shackelford; G J LeBlanc; A L Bleske; H A Euler; S Hoier
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2000-09

3.  Raising Darwin's consciousness : Female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy.

Authors:  S B Hrdy
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1997-03

4.  Willingness to engage in casual sex : The role of parental qualities and perceived risk of aggression.

Authors:  M K Surbey; C D Conohan
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2000-12

5.  The life histories of American stepfathers in evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  K G Anderson
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2000-12

6.  Response to Commentaries: Variation in Women's Intrasexual Sociality by Life History Strategy, Patrilocal Legacy, and Polygyny.

Authors:  Tania A Reynolds
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-07-19

7.  Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences.

Authors:  Sascha Schwarz; Manfred Hassebrauck
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-12

8.  Female breast size attractiveness for men as a function of sociosexual orientation (restricted vs. unrestricted).

Authors:  Agnieszka M Zelazniewicz; Boguslaw Pawlowski
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2011-12

9.  Physical attractiveness predicts endorsement of specific evolutionary psychology principles.

Authors:  Andrew Ward; Tammy English; Mark Chin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  When Love Meets Money: Priming the Possession of Money Influences Mating Strategies.

Authors:  Yi Ming Li; Jian Li; Darius K-S Chan; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.