Literature DB >> 26192413

Stabilizing and directional selection on facial paedomorphosis : Averageness or juvenilization?

P Wehr1, K MacDonald2, R Lindner2, G Yeung2.   

Abstract

Averageness is purportedly the result of stabilizing selection maintaining the population mean, whereas facial paedomorphosis is a product of directional selection driving the population mean towards an increasingly juvenile appearance. If selection is predominantly stabilizing, intermediate phenotypes reflect high genetic quality and mathematically average faces should be found attractive. If, on the other hand, directional selection is strong enough, extreme phenotypes reflect high genetic quality and juvenilized faces will be found attractive. To compare the effects of stabilizing and directional selection on facial paedomorphosis (juvenilization), graphic morphing and editing techniques were used to alter the appearance of composite faces to make them appear more or less juvenile. Both facial models and judges of attractiveness were from the CSU-Long Beach campus. Although effect sizes for both preferences were large, the effect for averageness was nearly twice that found for juvenilization, an indication that stabilizing selection influences preferences for facial paedomorphosis more so than directional selection in contemporary humans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Averageness; Facial Attractiveness; Paedomorphosis

Year:  2001        PMID: 26192413     DOI: 10.1007/s12110-001-1004-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  11 in total

1.  Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations.

Authors:  D Jones; K Hill
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09

2.  Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgment of women's attractiveness.

Authors:  D Singh; S Luis
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1995-03

3.  Is beauty in the eye of the beholder?

Authors:  D W Yu; G H Shepard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness.

Authors:  M R Cunningham; A P Barbee; C L Pike
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-07

5.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness.

Authors:  D I Perrett; K J Lee; I Penton-Voak; D Rowland; S Yoshikawa; D M Burt; S P Henzi; D L Castles; S Akamatsu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio.

Authors:  D Singh
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1993-08

7.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness.

Authors:  K Grammer; R Thornhill
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Body fat distribution and perception of desirable female body shape by young black men and women.

Authors:  D Singh
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.861

9.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness.

Authors:  D I Perrett; K A May; S Yoshikawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Evolutionary biology and feminism.

Authors:  P A Gowaty
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1992-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color.

Authors:  Tomáš Kočnar; S Adil Saribay; Karel Kleisner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.