Literature DB >> 9517727

Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy.

T Baccetti1, J S McGill, L Franchi, J A McNamara, I Tollaro.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy in children with Class III malocclusion was studied in a sample of 46 subjects in mixed dentition and compared with a control sample of 32 subjects with untreated Class III malocclusion. Treated and untreated samples were divided into early and late mixed-dentition groups to aid identification of the optimum timing of the orthopedic treatment of the underlying skeletal disharmony. Cephalometric analysis was based on a stable basicranial reference system, appropriate for longitudinal studies started in the early developmental ages. The level of significance for intergroup comparisons was set at a p value of 0.01. Significant forward displacement of the maxillary complex was found in the early-treatment group. The region of the pterygomaxillary suture, in particular, showed significant changes in the subjects treated during early mixed dentition. No significant maxillary modifications were recorded in the late-treatment group. Both early and late groups exhibited smaller increments in mandibular protrusion and larger increments in the intermaxillary vertical relationship compared with their respective Class III control groups. Only children treated at an early age, however, showed a significant upward and forward direction of condylar growth, leading to smaller increments in total mandibular length. These results indicate that the combination of a bonded maxillary expander and face-mask therapy is more effective in early mixed dentition than in late mixed dentition, especially with regard to the magnitude of the protraction effects on maxillary structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9517727     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70306-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  66 in total

1.  Assessing bone volume for orthodontic miniplate fixation below the maxillary frontal process.

Authors:  T M Präger; H G Brochhagen; R Mischkowski; P-G Jost-Brinkmann; R Müller-Hartwich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 2.  Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Foersch; Collin Jacobs; Susanne Wriedt; Marlene Hechtner; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparison of the soft and hard tissue effects of two different protraction mechanisms in class III patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mevlut Celikoglu; Ibrahim Yavuz; Tuba Unal; Husamettin Oktay; Abdulvahit Erdem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Lucia Cevidanes; Tiziano Baccetti; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Cephalometric variables used to predict the success of interceptive treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and face mask. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Daniele Nóbrega Nardoni; Danilo Furquim Siqueira; Mauricio de Almeida Cardoso; Leopoldino Capelozza Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

6.  Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Tung Nguyen; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie A Cornelis; Gavin Heymann; Leonardo K de Paula; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Comparative characterization of maxillary expansion and alternate maxillary expansions and constrictions in rats.

Authors:  Guang-Yao Feng; Bing-Shuang Zou; Xiang-Long Zeng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-12-06

8.  Comparison of short-term effects between face mask and skeletal anchorage therapy with intermaxillary elastics in patients with maxillary retrognathia.

Authors:  Cahide Ağlarcı; Elçin Esenlik; Yavuz Fındık
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Effects of chincup or facemask therapies on the orofacial airway and hyoid position in Class III subjects.

Authors:  Mehmet Akin; Faruk Izzet Ucar; Chousein Chousein; Zafer Sari
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Claudia Toyama Hino; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung T Nguyen; Hugo J De Clerck; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.