Literature DB >> 16276426

Effective maxillary orthopedic protraction for growing Class III patients: a clinical application simulates distraction osteogenesis.

Eric Jein-Wein Liou1.   

Abstract

The effective maxillary orthopedic protraction is an innovative technique for maxillary protraction in Class III growing patients. It includes three components: a new 2-hinged rapid maxillary expander for a greater amount of anterior displacement of maxilla, repetitive weekly protocol of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Constriction (Alt-RAMEC) for disarticulating the maxilla, and intraoral maxillary protraction springs for non-compliant protraction. On average, the maxilla could be protracted for 5.8 mm in 3 months and the result remains stable at least 2 years later. The rationale for this technique is sutural expansion/ protraction osteogenesis. Sutural expansion/ protraction osteogenesis is a form of distraction osteogenesis. However, it still needs to be scrutinized experimentally for the sutural reactions corresponding to the effective maxillary orthopedic protraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16276426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Orthod        ISSN: 1723-7785            Impact factor:   2.750


  23 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Foersch; Collin Jacobs; Susanne Wriedt; Marlene Hechtner; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate : Evaluation of soft and hard tissues using the Alt-RAMEC protocol.

Authors:  Ege Dogan; Ozlem Seckin
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Protocols for Late Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles.

Authors:  Stephen L-K Yen
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 0.970

4.  Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Tung Nguyen; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie A Cornelis; Gavin Heymann; Leonardo K de Paula; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Effects of facemask treatment anchored with miniplates after alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions; a pilot study.

Authors:  Demet Kaya; Ilken Kocadereli; Bahadir Kan; Ferda Tasar
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Do we pay for maxillary protraction? Evaluation of the effects of Alt-RAMEC protocol and face mask treatment on root development.

Authors:  Berza Sen Yilmaz; Elif Dilara Seker; Hanife Nuray Yilmaz; Nazan Kucukkeles
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Comparative characterization of maxillary expansion and alternate maxillary expansions and constrictions in rats.

Authors:  Guang-Yao Feng; Bing-Shuang Zou; Xiang-Long Zeng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-12-06

8.  [Meta-analysis of the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents].

Authors:  Hui Shi; Hong-Shan Ge; Lu-Yi Chen; Zhi-Hua Li
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-01

9.  Three-dimensional evaluation of treatment results of the Alt-RAMEC and facemask protocol in growing patients.

Authors:  V Sitaropoulou; H N Yilmaz; B Yilmaz; N Kucukkeles
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Comparison of the Changes Following Two Treatment Approaches: Rapid Maxillary Expansion Versus Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Constriction.

Authors:  Fatih Çelebi; Murat Çelikdelen
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.