Literature DB >> 9622758

Cephalometric effects of combined palatal expansion and facemask therapy on Class III malocclusion.

P E Nartallo-Turley1, P K Turley.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the cephalometric changes that occur with palatal expansion/facemask therapy for Class III malocclusion. Pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms from 21 patients were traced and analyzed by traditional cephalometric measures, an x-y coordinate system, and along the functional occlusal plane. Differences between T1 and T2 values were analyzed with paired t-tests. Mean ages were 7.26 years (T1) and 8.18 years (T2). Average treatment time was 11.05 months. Statistically significant anterior movement of the maxilla occurred with increases in SNA (+2.35), maxillary depth (+2.22), and ANB (+3.66), and anterior movement of A-point (+3.34 mm) and ANS (+3.17 mm). The maxilla rotated counterclockwise, with PNS moving down more than ANS (-2.21 mm and -0.82, respectively). The mandible rotated clockwise with mild decreases in SNB (-1.32) and facial depth, (-1.2) but significant downward movement at menton (-4.34 mm). Occlusal plane analysis demonstrated that the correction was due more to the maxilla than the mandible (+2.35 and -1.88 mm, respectively). The maxillary molars moved forward (+1.70 mm) as did the incisors (+1.75 mm). Soft tissue changes included the nose and upper lip moving forward (3.43 and 3.67 mm, respectively), and menton moving downward (-3.49 mm). The results indicate that facemask/palatal expansion therapy improves Class III malocclusion by a combination of skeletal and dental changes that occur the anteroposterior dimension and in the vertical plane of space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9622758     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0217:CEOCPE>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  27 in total

1.  3D soft tissue changes in facial morphology in patients with cleft lip and palate and class III mal occlusion under therapy with rapid maxillary expansion and delaire facemask.

Authors:  Claudia Sade Hoefert; Margit Bacher; Tina Herberts; Michael Krimmel; Siegmar Reinert; Gernot Göz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Cephalometric variables used to predict the success of interceptive treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and face mask. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Daniele Nóbrega Nardoni; Danilo Furquim Siqueira; Mauricio de Almeida Cardoso; Leopoldino Capelozza Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

3.  Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Tung Nguyen; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie A Cornelis; Gavin Heymann; Leonardo K de Paula; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Bonded versus banded rapid palatal expander followed by facial mask therapy: analysis on digital dental casts.

Authors:  Roberta Lione; Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Efisio Defraia; Lorenzo Franchi; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Treatment of Class III malocclusion using miniscrew-anchored inverted Forsus FRD: Controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Osama Eissa; Mahmoud ElShennawy; Safaa Gaballah; Ghada ElMehy; Tarek El-Bialy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates.

Authors:  Gavin C Heymann; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie Cornelis; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Segmental LeFort I osteotomy for treatment of a Class III malocclusion with temporomandibular disorder.

Authors:  Marcos Janson; Guilherme Janson; Eduardo Sant'Ana; Alexandre Nakamura; Marcos Roberto de Freitas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Maxillary distraction osteogenesis at Le Fort-I level induces bone apposition at infraorbital rim.

Authors:  Vidya Rattan; Ashok Kumar Jena; Satinder Pal Singh; Ashok Kumar Utreja
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.

Authors:  Hyo-Won Ahn; Keun-Woo Kim; Il-Hyung Yang; Jin-Young Choi; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Dentofacial effects of two facemask therapies for maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Yuan Shu Ge; Jin Liu; Lin Chen; Jian Li Han; Xin Guo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.