Literature DB >> 18331946

Midfacial protraction with skeletally anchored face mask therapy: a novel approach and preliminary results.

Beyza Hancioglu Kircelli1, Zafer Ozgür Pektas.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the effects of facemask treatment with a rigid skeletal anchor.
METHODS: Miniplates were placed on the lateral nasal wall of the maxilla in 6 subjects (mean age, 11.8 +/- 1.1 years). No dental tissue was incorporated into the anchorage system. Lateral cephalograms of each patient were evaluated at the beginning of treatment (T1), at the end of active treatment (T2), and at the end of follow-up (T3).
RESULTS: In the horizontal plane, mean A-point movement was 4.8 +/- 2.0 mm in a mean of 10.8 +/- 2.4 months. The infraorbital region showed significant anterior movement (mean, 3.3 +/- 1.1 mm) at T2. At T3, advancement of the maxilla and the infraorbital region was well maintained (mean follow-up time, 15.2 +/- 0.9 months). Miniplate stability was excellent in all patients throughout treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Remarkable advancement in the middle face and consequent fullness in the soft-tissue profile can be achieved by using skeletal anchorage in conjunction with facemask therapy in the late mixed-dentition period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18331946     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  38 in total

1.  Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing Class III patients.

Authors:  T Baccetti; H J De Clerck; L H Cevidanes; L Franchi
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of the soft and hard tissue effects of two different protraction mechanisms in class III patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mevlut Celikoglu; Ibrahim Yavuz; Tuba Unal; Husamettin Oktay; Abdulvahit Erdem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Eman H Elabbassy; Noha E Sabet; Islam T Hassan; Dina H Elghoul; Marwa A Elkassaby
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: Part II-The influence of sutural maturation on the response to maxillary protraction.

Authors:  F Angelieri; A C Ruellas; M S Yatabe; L H S Cevidanes; L Franchi; C Toyama-Hino; H J De Clerck; T Nguyen; J A McNamara
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients.

Authors:  Hugo De Clerck; Lucia Cevidanes; Tiziano Baccetti
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Tung Nguyen; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie A Cornelis; Gavin Heymann; Leonardo K de Paula; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates.

Authors:  Gavin C Heymann; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie Cornelis; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency.

Authors:  Hugo J De Clerck; Marie A Cornelis; Lucia H Cevidanes; Gavin C Heymann; Camilla J F Tulloch
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Comparison of short-term effects between face mask and skeletal anchorage therapy with intermaxillary elastics in patients with maxillary retrognathia.

Authors:  Cahide Ağlarcı; Elçin Esenlik; Yavuz Fındık
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Claudia Toyama Hino; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung T Nguyen; Hugo J De Clerck; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.