Literature DB >> 22125281

ROC analysis of the accuracy of Noncycloplegic retinoscopy, Retinomax Autorefractor, and SureSight Vision Screener for preschool vision screening.

Gui-shuang Ying1, Maureen Maguire, Graham Quinn, Marjean Taylor Kulp, Lynn Cyert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate, by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the accuracy of three instruments of refractive error in detecting eye conditions among 3- to 5-year-old Head Start preschoolers and to evaluate differences in accuracy between instruments and screeners and by age of the child.
METHODS: Children participating in the Vision In Preschoolers (VIP) Study (n = 4040), had screening tests administered by pediatric eye care providers (phase I) or by both nurse and lay screeners (phase II). Noncycloplegic retinoscopy (NCR), the Retinomax Autorefractor (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), and the SureSight Vision Screener (SureSight, Alpharetta, GA) were used in phase I, and Retinomax and SureSight were used in phase II. Pediatric eye care providers performed a standardized eye examination to identify amblyopia, strabismus, significant refractive error, and reduced visual acuity. The accuracy of the screening tests was summarized by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and compared between instruments and screeners and by age group.
RESULTS: The three screening tests had a high AUC for all categories of screening personnel. The AUC for detecting any VIP-targeted condition was 0.83 for NCR, 0.83 (phase I) to 0.88 (phase II) for Retinomax, and 0.86 (phase I) to 0.87 (phase II) for SureSight. The AUC was 0.93 to 0.95 for detecting group 1 (most severe) conditions and did not differ between instruments or screeners or by age of the child.
CONCLUSIONS: NCR, Retinomax, and SureSight had similar and high accuracy in detecting vision disorders in preschoolers across all types of screeners and age of child, consistent with previously reported results at specificity levels of 90% and 94%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22125281      PMCID: PMC3341123          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  13 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Accuracy of noncycloplegic autorefraction in school-age children in China.

Authors:  Jialiang Zhao; Jin Mao; Rong Luo; Fengrong Li; Gopal P Pokharel; Leon B Ellwein
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Cycloplegic autorefraction results in pre-school children using the Nikon Retinomax Plus and the Welch Allyn SureSight.

Authors:  Gregg Steele; Dennis Ireland; Sandra Block
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Vision in Preschoolers Study.

Authors:  Robert W Arnold
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Preschool vision screening tests administered by nurse screeners compared with lay screeners in the vision in preschoolers study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Effect of age using Lea Symbols or HOTV for preschool vision screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Sensitivity of screening tests for detecting vision in preschoolers-targeted vision disorders when specificity is 94%.

Authors:  Gui-Shuang Ying; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Maureen Maguire; Elise Ciner; Lynn Cyert; Paulette Schmidt
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.

Authors:  Paulette Schmidt; Maureen Maguire; Velma Dobson; Graham Quinn; Elise Ciner; Lynn Cyert; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Bruce Moore; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Maryann Redford; Gui-shuang Ying
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  20 in total

1.  Accuracy of noncycloplegic retinoscopy, retinomax autorefractor, and SureSight vision screener for detecting significant refractive errors.

Authors:  Marjean Taylor Kulp; Gui-Shuang Ying; Jiayan Huang; Maureen Maguire; Graham Quinn; Elise B Ciner; Lynn A Cyert; Deborah A Orel-Bixler; Bruce D Moore
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The usefulness of the Retinomax autorefractor for childhood screening validated against a Danish preterm cohort examined at the age of 4 years.

Authors:  H C Fledelius; R Bangsgaard; C Slidsborg; M laCour
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Detection of Significant Hyperopia in Preschool Children Using Two Automated Vision Screeners.

Authors:  Maureen G Maguire; Gui-Shuang Ying; Elise B Ciner; Marjean Taylor Kulp; T Rowan Candy; Bruce Moore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Comparison of the Retinomax hand-held autorefractor versus table-top autorefractor and retinoscopy.

Authors:  Ibrahim Tuncer; Mehmet Ozgur Zengin; Eyyup Karahan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Utility of an open field Shack-Hartmann aberrometer for measurement of refractive error in infants and young children.

Authors:  Erin M Harvey; Joseph M Miller; Jim Schwiegerling
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Intertester agreement in refractive error measurements.

Authors:  Jiayan Huang; Maureen G Maguire; Elise Ciner; Marjean T Kulp; Graham E Quinn; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Lynn A Cyert; Bruce Moore; Gui-Shuang Ying
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 7.  Vision Screening, Vision Disorders, and Impacts of Hyperopia in Young Children: Outcomes of the Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) and Vision in Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Studies.

Authors:  Marjean Taylor Kulp; Elise Ciner; Gui-Shuang Ying; T Rowan Candy; Bruce D Moore; Deborah Orel-Bixler
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2022-01-18

8.  Relationship between Blood Stasis Syndrome Score and Cardioankle Vascular Index in Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Ki-Ho Cho; Kyoo-Pil Kim; Byung-Cheol Woo; Young-Jee Kim; Joo-Young Park; Seung-Yeon Cho; Seong-Uk Park; Woo-Sang Jung; Jung-Mi Park; Sang-Kwan Moon
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Quantitative analysis of SOD2, ALDH1A1 and MGST1 messenger ribonucleic acid in anterior lens epithelium of patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome.

Authors:  Barbara Strzalka-Mrozik; Lilianna Prudlo; Malgorzata W Kimsa; Magdalena C Kimsa; Malgorzata Kapral; Malgorzata Nita; Urszula Mazurek
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.367

10.  Bioactive substances in the stratum corneum of the epidermis found as indicators of skin damage due to sun exposure.

Authors:  Atsushi Fukunaga; Satoshi Fukushima; Hiroaki Iwata; Makiko Nakahara; Rikako Sasaki; Naoko Baba; Hiroshi Matsunaka; Yumi Murakami; Masutaka Furue; Chikako Nishigori
Journal:  Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.