Literature DB >> 22124778

Multiphase contrast-enhanced CT with highly concentrated contrast agent can be used for PET attenuation correction in integrated PET/CT imaging.

Philip Aschoff1, Christian Plathow, Thomas Beyer, Matthias P Lichy, Gunter Erb, Mehmet Ö Öksüz, Claus D Claussen, Christina Pfannenberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: State-of-the-art positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) systems incorporate multislice CT technology, thus facilitating the acquisition of multiphase, contrast-enhanced CT data as part of integrated PET/CT imaging protocols. We assess the influence of a highly concentrated iodinated contrast medium (CM) on quantification and image quality following CT-based attenuation correction (CT-AC) in PET/CT.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with suspected malignant liver lesions were enrolled prospectively. PET/CT was performed 60 min after injection of 400 MBq of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and following the biphasic administration of an intravenous CM (400 mg iodine/ml, Iomeron 400). PET images were reconstructed with CT-AC using any of four acquired CT image sets: non-enhanced, pre-contrast (n-PET), arterial phase (art-PET), portal venous phase (pv-PET) and late phase (late-PET). Normal tissue activity and liver lesions were assessed visually and quantitatively on each PET/CT image set.
RESULTS: Visual assessment of PET following CT-AC revealed no noticeable difference in image appearance or quality when using any of the four CT data sets for CT-AC. A total of 44 PET-positive liver lesions was identified in 21 of 28 patients. There were no false-negative or false-positive lesions on PET. Mean standardized uptake values (SUV) in 36 evaluable lesions were: 5.5 (n-PET), 5.8 (art-PET), 5.8 (pv-PET) and 5.8 (late-PET), with the highest mean increase in mean SUV of 6%. Mean SUV changes in liver background increased by up to 10% from n-PET to pv-PET.
CONCLUSION: Multiphase CT data acquired with the use of highly concentrated CM can be used for qualitative assessment of liver lesions in torso FDG PET/CT. The influence on quantification of FDG uptake is small and negligible for most clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22124778     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-011-1919-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  25 in total

1.  Cost considerations regarding an integrated CT-PET system.

Authors:  G K von Schulthess
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Focal tracer uptake: a potential artifact in contrast-enhanced dual-modality PET/CT scans.

Authors:  Gerald Antoch; Lutz S Freudenberg; Thomas Egelhof; Jörg Stattaus; Walter Jentzen; Jörg F Debatin; Andreas Bockisch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Bruce H Hasegawa; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 4.  Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006.

Authors:  Johannes Czernin; Martin Allen-Auerbach; Heinrich R Schelbert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Does iodine concentration affect the diagnostic efficacy of biphasic spiral CT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma?

Authors:  A Marchianò; C Spreafico; R Lanocita; L Frigerio; G Di Tolla; G Patelli; F Garbagnati; F Heiman; P Taroni; B Damascelli
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2005 May-Jun

7.  PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients.

Authors:  A K Berthelsen; S Holm; A Loft; T L Klausen; F Andersen; L Højgaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-05-21       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT.

Authors:  Kazuo Awai; Koichi Takada; Hiromitsu Onishi; Shinichi Hori
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Nodal status of malignant lymphoma in pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways: comparison of integrated PET/CT with or without contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Morimoto; Ukihide Tateishi; Tetsuo Maeda; Yasuaki Arai; Yasuo Nakajima; E Edmund Kim
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  PET/CT: comparison of quantitative tracer uptake between germanium and CT transmission attenuation-corrected images.

Authors:  Yuji Nakamoto; Medhat Osman; Christian Cohade; Laura T Marshall; Jonathan M Links; Steve Kohlmyer; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  10 in total

1.  PET/CT in lung cancer: Influence of contrast medium on quantitative and clinical assessment.

Authors:  Florian F Behrendt; Yavuz Temur; Frederik A Verburg; Moritz Palmowski; Thomas Krohn; Hubertus Pietsch; Christiane K Kuhl; Felix M Mottaghy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Contrast medium injection protocol adjusted for body surface area in combined PET/CT.

Authors:  Florian F Behrendt; Marilou Rebière; Andreas Goedicke; Hubertus Pietsch; Karin Palmowski; Christiane K Kuhl; Felix M Mottaghy; Frederik A Verburg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck oncology: the point of view of the radiation oncologist.

Authors:  Jon Cacicedo; Arturo Navarro; Olga Del Hoyo; Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga; Filippo Alongi; Jose A Medina; Olgun Elicin; Andrea Skanjeti; Francesco Giammarile; Pedro Bilbao; Francisco Casquero; Berardino de Bari; Alan Dal Pra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Operational and Dosimetric Aspects of Pediatric PET/CT.

Authors:  Frederic H Fahey; Alison Goodkind; Robert D MacDougall; Leah Oberg; Sonja I Ziniel; Richard Cappock; Michael J Callahan; Neha Kwatra; S Ted Treves; Stephan D Voss
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  2022 ASNC/AAPM/SCCT/SNMMI guideline for the use of CT in hybrid nuclear/CT cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Timothy M Bateman; Kelley R Branch; Andrew Crean; Eric L Gingold; Randall C Thompson; Sarah E McKenney; Edward J Miller; Venkatesh L Murthy; Koen Nieman; Todd C Villines; Michael V Yester; Andrew J Einstein; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 6.  Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation.

Authors:  Julian M M Rogasch; Frank Hofheinz; Lutz van Heek; Conrad-Amadeus Voltin; Ronald Boellaard; Carsten Kobe
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10

7.  Comparison of conventional and Si-photomultiplier-based PET systems for image quality and diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Jenny Oddstig; Sigrid Leide Svegborn; Helen Almquist; Ulrika Bitzén; Sabine Garpered; Fredrik Hedeer; Cecilia Hindorf; Jonas Jögi; Lena Jönsson; David Minarik; Richard Petersson; Annika Welinder; Per Wollmer; Elin Trägårdh
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  Contrast-enhanced small-animal PET/CT in cancer research: strong improvement of diagnostic accuracy without significant alteration of quantitative accuracy and NEMA NU 4-2008 image quality parameters.

Authors:  Charline Lasnon; Elske Quak; Mélanie Briand; Zheng Gu; Marie-Hélène Louis; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.138

9.  PET/CT in Oncology: Current Status and Perspectives.

Authors:  Johannes Czernin; Martin Allen-Auerbach; David Nathanson; Ken Herrmann
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2013-05-03

Review 10.  How we read pediatric PET/CT: indications and strategies for image acquisition, interpretation and reporting.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Colleran; Neha Kwatra; Leah Oberg; Frederick D Grant; Laura Drubach; Michael J Callahan; Robert D MacDougall; Frederic H Fahey; Stephan D Voss
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.909

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.