Literature DB >> 22120767

Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study.

Sangeeta Mehta1, Friederike Quittnat Pelletier, Maedean Brown, Cheryl Ethier, David Wells, Lisa Burry, Rod MacDonald.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Consent for research participation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is often obtained from a substitute decision maker (SDM). In this study we explored SDMs' reasons for declining or providing consent for research studies for critically ill adult family members.
METHODS: Two questionnaires were developed, one directed at SDMs who agreed to have their relative participate in a research study (AGREE group), and another for SDMs who declined participation (DECLINE group). The questionnaires explored SDMs' opinions about research in general, timing of research approach, the informed consent process, and reasons for agreeing or declining participation.
RESULTS: Ninety-six SDMs completed the questionnaire (68 AGREE, 27 DECLINE). There were no differences between AGREE and DECLINE groups with respect to SDM demographics, perceived severity of illness of the patient, or the research study approach. The most common reasons for providing consent were potential for research to help others (91%), research is important for medical progress (88%), and trust in the medical team (87%). The most common reasons for declining consent were SDM was too anxious to consider research (67%), fear that patient would receive experimental treatment (37%), and concern about risks of the study (33%).
CONCLUSIONS: SDMs who agree to have a relative participate in an ICU research study are motivated by the potential benefit to the patient and altruism. SDMs who decline research participation, while not generally opposed to research, are fearful of study-related harm or discomfort for the patient, and are too anxious to consider a research study at that time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22120767     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2411-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  10 in total

1.  The ethical conduct of clinical research involving critically ill patients in the United States and Canada: principles and recommendations.

Authors:  John M Luce; Deborah J Cook; Thomas R Martin; Derek C Angus; Homer A Boushey; J Randall Curtis; John E Heffner; Paul N Lanken; Mitchell M Levy; Paula Y Polite; Graeme M Rocker; Robert D Truog
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Is the concept of informed consent applicable to clinical research involving critically ill patients?

Authors:  John M Luce
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  How proxies make decisions about research for patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  J Sugarman; C Cain; R Wallace; K A Welsh-Bohmer
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Frédéric Pochard; Nancy Kentish-Barnes; Sylvie Chevret; Jérôme Aboab; Christophe Adrie; Djilali Annane; Gérard Bleichner; Pierre Edouard Bollaert; Michael Darmon; Thomas Fassier; Richard Galliot; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; Cyril Goulenok; Dany Goldgran-Toledano; Jan Hayon; Mercé Jourdain; Michel Kaidomar; Christian Laplace; Jérôme Larché; Jérôme Liotier; Laurent Papazian; Catherine Poisson; Jean Reignier; Fayçal Saidi; Benoît Schlemmer
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Parental comprehension and satisfaction in informed consent in paediatric clinical trials: a prospective study on childhood leukaemia.

Authors:  H Chappuy; A Baruchel; G Leverger; C Oudot; B Brethon; S Haouy; A Auvrignon; D Davous; F Doz; J M Tréluyer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians.

Authors:  E Azoulay; S Chevret; G Leleu; F Pochard; M Barboteu; C Adrie; P Canoui; J R Le Gall; B Schlemmer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research?

Authors:  M Coppolino; L Ackerson
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  M van Stuijvenberg; M H Suur; S de Vos; G C Tjiang; E W Steyerberg; G Derksen-Lubsen; H A Moll
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Ability of family members to predict patient's consent to critical care research.

Authors:  Magali Ciroldi; Alain Cariou; Christophe Adrie; Djilali Annane; Vincent Castelain; Yves Cohen; Arnaud Delahaye; Luc Marie Joly; Richard Galliot; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; Laurent Papazian; Fabrice Michel; Nancy Kenstish Barnes; Benoit Schlemmer; Frédéric Pochard; Elie Azoulay
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  What motivates British parents to consent for research? A questionnaire study.

Authors:  Helen M Sammons; Maria Atkinson; Imti Choonara; Terence Stephenson
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 2.125

  10 in total
  27 in total

1.  Considering the vulnerabilities of surrogate decision-makers when obtaining consent for critical care research.

Authors:  Kali A Barrett; Damon C Scales
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Research to inform the consent-to-research process.

Authors:  Damon C Scales
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Ethical challenges involved in obtaining consent for research from patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Fiona Ecarnot; Jean-Pierre Quenot; Guillaume Besch; Gaël Piton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

4.  Surrogate receptivity to participation in critical illness genetic research: aligning research oversight and stakeholder concerns.

Authors:  Bradley D Freeman; Kevin Butler; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Brian R Clarridge; Carie R Kennedy; Jessica LeBlanc; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Increasing participation in critical care studies: the need to understand surrogate decision-makers for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Christiane S Hartog; Anders Aneman; Bara Ricou
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Enrollment Challenges in Critical Care Nursing Research.

Authors:  Mary Lou Sole; Aurea Middleton; Lara Deaton; Melody Bennett; Steven Talbert; Daleen Penoyer
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Research participants' opinions of delayed consent for a randomised controlled trial of glucose control in intensive care.

Authors:  J E Potter; S McKinley; A Delaney
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Is there a role for physician involvement in introducing research to surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit? (The Approach trial: a pilot mixed methods study).

Authors:  K E A Burns; L Rizvi; O M Smith; Y Lee; J Lee; M Wang; M Brown; M Parker; A Premji; D Leung; M Hammond Mobilio; L Gotlib-Conn; R Nisenbaum; M Santos; Y Li; S Mehta
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Strategies for Enhancing Family Participation in Research in the ICU: Findings From a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Danae Dotolo; Elizabeth L Nielsen; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  ICU research: the impact of invasiveness on informed consent.

Authors:  Fabienne Gigon; Paolo Merlani; Catherine Chenaud; Bara Ricou
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.