Literature DB >> 17361388

Ability of family members to predict patient's consent to critical care research.

Magali Ciroldi1,2, Alain Cariou1,3, Christophe Adrie1,4, Djilali Annane1,5, Vincent Castelain1,6, Yves Cohen1,7, Arnaud Delahaye1, Luc Marie Joly1, Richard Galliot1,8, Maité Garrouste-Orgeas1,9, Laurent Papazian10, Fabrice Michel1, Nancy Kenstish Barnes1,2, Benoit Schlemmer1,2, Frédéric Pochard1,2, Elie Azoulay11,12.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A European Union Directive provides for the designation of a surrogate who can consent to or refuse inclusion of an incapacitated patient in research studies. The accuracy with which surrogates consent to research on behalf of patients has not been evaluated in the intensive care unit (ICU).
METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted in ten ICUs of the French Famirea study group between July and October 2004. Two hypothetical studies were simultaneously submitted to the patient, surrogate, and physician at the time that the patient was discharged to a ward. One study involved minimal risk and the other greater-than-minimal risk to the patients.
RESULTS: With the minimal risk study there was patient-surrogate discrepancy in 32% of cases and patient-physician discrepancy in 25%. Corresponding figures with the greater-than-minimal risk study were 42% and 46%. None of the collected variables differed significantly between cases with and without patient-surrogate discrepancy.
CONCLUSIONS: Family members designated to serve as surrogate decision makers may fail to accurately consent to research for critically ill patients in one-third to nearly one-half of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17361388     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-007-0582-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  29 in total

1.  What makes clinical research ethical?

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D Wendler; C Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Ethical considerations for research in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Luca M Bigatello; Edward George; William E Hurford
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 3.  Protecting subjects with decisional impairment in research: the need for a multifaceted approach.

Authors:  Henry J Silverman; John M Luce; Jack Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 4.  Moral justifications for surrogate decision making in the intensive care unit: implications and limitations.

Authors:  Robert M Arnold; John Kellum
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 5.  Recommendations for informed consent forms for critical care clinical trials.

Authors:  Henry J Silverman; John M Luce; Paul N Lanken; Alan H Morris; Andrea L Harabin; Cathryn F Oldmixon; B Taylor Thompson; Gordon R Bernard
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Medical research involving incapacitated adults: implications of the EU Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC.

Authors:  Kathleen Liddell; Julian Bion; Douglas Chamberlain; Christiane Druml; Erwin Kompanje; Francois Lemaire; David Menon; Bozidar Vrhovac; Christian J Wiedermann
Journal:  Med Law Rev       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Frédéric Pochard; Nancy Kentish-Barnes; Sylvie Chevret; Jérôme Aboab; Christophe Adrie; Djilali Annane; Gérard Bleichner; Pierre Edouard Bollaert; Michael Darmon; Thomas Fassier; Richard Galliot; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; Cyril Goulenok; Dany Goldgran-Toledano; Jan Hayon; Mercé Jourdain; Michel Kaidomar; Christian Laplace; Jérôme Larché; Jérôme Liotier; Laurent Papazian; Catherine Poisson; Jean Reignier; Fayçal Saidi; Benoît Schlemmer
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill.

Authors:  C M Lilly; D L De Meo; L A Sonna; K J Haley; A F Massaro; R F Wallace; S Cody
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Junior versus senior physicians for informing families of intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Delphine Moreau; Dany Goldgran-Toledano; Corinne Alberti; Mercé Jourdain; Christophe Adrie; Djilali Annane; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Laurent Papazian; Philippe Quinio; Frédéric Pochard; Elie Azoulay
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Improving the process of informed consent in the critically ill.

Authors:  Nicole Davis; Anne Pohlman; Brian Gehlbach; John P Kress; Jane McAtee; Jean Herlitz; Jesse Hall
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  26 in total

1.  Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Sangeeta Mehta; Friederike Quittnat Pelletier; Maedean Brown; Cheryl Ethier; David Wells; Lisa Burry; Rod MacDonald
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine, 2007. III. Ethics and legislation, health services research, pharmacology and toxicology, nutrition and paediatrics.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  An Alternative Consent Process for Minimal Risk Research in the ICU.

Authors:  Melissa A Terry; Daniel E Freedberg; Marilyn C Morris
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  The 'Consent to Research' paradigm in critical care: challenges and potential solutions.

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Celia Zubrinich; John Marshall; Deborah Cook
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Clinical research in critically ill patients: the situation in Italy.

Authors:  Nereo Zamperetti; Nicola Latronico
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Ethical challenges involved in obtaining consent for research from patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Fiona Ecarnot; Jean-Pierre Quenot; Guillaume Besch; Gaël Piton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

7.  Perspectives of Decisional Surrogates and Patients Regarding Critical Illness Genetic Research.

Authors:  Bradley D Freeman; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Carie R Kennedy; Jessica LeBlanc; Alexander Eastman; Jennifer Barillas; Catherine M Wittgen; Kathryn Indsey; Rumel S Mahmood; Brian R Clarridge
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-05-01

8.  Research participants' opinions of delayed consent for a randomised controlled trial of glucose control in intensive care.

Authors:  J E Potter; S McKinley; A Delaney
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  ICU research: the impact of invasiveness on informed consent.

Authors:  Fabienne Gigon; Paolo Merlani; Catherine Chenaud; Bara Ricou
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Attitudes to drug trials among relatives of unconscious intensive care patients.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Michael Ibsen; Jan Bonde
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.