Danae Dotolo1, Elizabeth L Nielsen2, J Randall Curtis2, Ruth A Engelberg2. 1. School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. Electronic address: danaed@uw.edu. 2. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Family members of critically ill patients who participate in research focused on palliative care issues have been found to be systematically different from those who do not. These differences threaten the validity of research and raise ethical questions about worsening disparities in care by failing to represent diverse perspectives. OBJECTIVES: This study's aims were to explore: 1) barriers and facilitators influencing family members' decisions to participate in palliative care research; and 2) potential methods to enhance research participation. METHODS: Family members who were asked to participate in a randomized trial testing the efficacy of a facilitator to improve clinician-family communication in the intensive care unit (ICU). Family members who participated (n = 17) and those who declined participation (n = 7) in Family Communication Study were interviewed about their recruitment experiences. We also included family members of currently critically ill patients to assess current experiences (n = 4). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Investigators used thematic analysis to identify factors influencing family members' decisions. Transcripts were co-reviewed to synthesize codes and themes. RESULTS: Three factors influencing participants' decisions were identified: Altruism, Research Experience, and Enhanced Resources. Altruism and Research Experience described intrinsic characteristics that are less amenable to strategies for improving participation rates. Enhanced Resources reflects families' desires for increased access to information and logistical and emotional support. CONCLUSION: Family members found their recruitment experiences to be positive when staff were knowledgeable about the ICU, sensitive to the stressful circumstances, and conveyed a caring attitude. By training research staff to be supportive of families' emotional needs and need for logistical knowledge about the ICU, recruitment of a potentially more diverse sample of families may be enhanced.
CONTEXT: Family members of critically illpatients who participate in research focused on palliative care issues have been found to be systematically different from those who do not. These differences threaten the validity of research and raise ethical questions about worsening disparities in care by failing to represent diverse perspectives. OBJECTIVES: This study's aims were to explore: 1) barriers and facilitators influencing family members' decisions to participate in palliative care research; and 2) potential methods to enhance research participation. METHODS: Family members who were asked to participate in a randomized trial testing the efficacy of a facilitator to improve clinician-family communication in the intensive care unit (ICU). Family members who participated (n = 17) and those who declined participation (n = 7) in Family Communication Study were interviewed about their recruitment experiences. We also included family members of currently critically illpatients to assess current experiences (n = 4). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Investigators used thematic analysis to identify factors influencing family members' decisions. Transcripts were co-reviewed to synthesize codes and themes. RESULTS: Three factors influencing participants' decisions were identified: Altruism, Research Experience, and Enhanced Resources. Altruism and Research Experience described intrinsic characteristics that are less amenable to strategies for improving participation rates. Enhanced Resources reflects families' desires for increased access to information and logistical and emotional support. CONCLUSION: Family members found their recruitment experiences to be positive when staff were knowledgeable about the ICU, sensitive to the stressful circumstances, and conveyed a caring attitude. By training research staff to be supportive of families' emotional needs and need for logistical knowledge about the ICU, recruitment of a potentially more diverse sample of families may be enhanced.
Authors: Sangeeta Mehta; Friederike Quittnat Pelletier; Maedean Brown; Cheryl Ethier; David Wells; Lisa Burry; Rod MacDonald Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-11-26 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Nancy Kentish-Barnes; Jennifer L McAdam; Sonia Kouki; Zoé Cohen-Solal; Marine Chaize; Marion Galon; Virginie Souppart; Kathleen A Puntillo; Elie Azoulay Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Karen E A Burns; Clara Juando Prats; Maria Maione; Mary Lanceta; Celia Zubrinich; Lianne Jeffs; Orla M Smith Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-02
Authors: J Randall Curtis; Patsy D Treece; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Julia Gold; Paul S Ciechanowski; Sarah E Shannon; Nita Khandelwal; Jessica P Young; Ruth A Engelberg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ellen Iverson; Aaron Celious; Carie R Kennedy; Erica Shehane; Alexander Eastman; Victoria Warren; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Brian Clarridge; Bradley D Freeman Journal: Chest Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Karen E A Burns; Celia Zubrinich; Wylie Tan; Stavroula Raptis; Wei Xiong; Orla Smith; Ellen McDonald; John C Marshall; Raphael Saginur; Ron Heslegrave; Gordon Rubenfeld; Deborah J Cook Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 21.405