Literature DB >> 28864436

Enrollment Challenges in Critical Care Nursing Research.

Mary Lou Sole1, Aurea Middleton2, Lara Deaton2, Melody Bennett2, Steven Talbert2, Daleen Penoyer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enrollment challenges for critical care research are common. Contributing factors include short enrollment windows, the crisis nature of critical illness, lack of research staff, unavailable legal proxy, family dynamics, and language barriers.
OBJECTIVE: To describe enrollment statistics for an ongoing critical care nursing trial, barriers to recruitment, and strategies to enhance enrollment.
METHODS: Two years' worth of recruitment and enrollment data from an oral care intervention trial in critically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation at 1 hospital were analyzed. Recruitment logs include number of patients screened, eligible, enrolled, and declined and patients' sex, race, and ethnicity.
RESULTS: Target enrollment (15.5 patients per month) was based on experience and historical data. Strategies implemented to promote enrollment included providing study personnel at least 18 hours per day for 7 days per week, regular rounds, communication with direct care staff, and Spanish consent processes. In 2 years, 6963 patients were screened; 1551 (22%) were eligible. Consent was sought from 366 (24% of eligible patients). Enrollment averaged 13.3 patients per month (86% of projected target). The main factor impeding enrollment was unavailability of a legal proxy to provide consent (88%). The refusal rates of white (11%), black (13%), and Hispanic (16%) patients did not differ significantly. However, those classified as Asian or as more than 1 race declined significantly more often (35%) than did white or black patients (P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Unavailability of a legal proxy within a short enrollment window was the major challenge to enrollment. Various factors influenced consent decisions. Clinical study design requires more conservative estimates. ©2017 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28864436      PMCID: PMC6015765          DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2017511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  14 in total

1.  Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Sangeeta Mehta; Friederike Quittnat Pelletier; Maedean Brown; Cheryl Ethier; David Wells; Lisa Burry; Rod MacDonald
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Intensive care unit research and informed consent: still a conundrum.

Authors:  Mihaela Matei; Francois Lemaire
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Rates and determinants of informed consent: a case study of an international thromboprophylaxis trial.

Authors:  Orla M Smith; Ellen McDonald; Nicole Zytaruk; Denise Foster; Andrea Matte; France Clarke; Laurie Meade; Nicole O'Callaghan; Shirley Vallance; Pauline Galt; Dorrilyn Rajbhandari; Marcelo Rocha; Sangeeta Mehta; Niall D Ferguson; Richard Hall; Robert Fowler; Karen Burns; Ismael Qushmaq; Marlies Ostermann; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Deborah Cook
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.425

4.  Critical care research and pre-emptive informed consent: a practical approach used in Chris Hani Baragwanath ICU.

Authors:  M Pinder; S Tshukutsoane; J Scribante; R Piccolo; J Lipman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Commentary: Improving participant recruitment in clinical and translational research.

Authors:  Nariman Nasser; Deborah Grady; C William Balke
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Research recruitment practices and critically ill patients. A multicenter, cross-sectional study (the Consent Study).

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Celia Zubrinich; Wylie Tan; Stavroula Raptis; Wei Xiong; Orla Smith; Ellen McDonald; John C Marshall; Raphael Saginur; Ron Heslegrave; Gordon Rubenfeld; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Telemedicine Provides Noninferior Research Informed Consent for Remote Study Enrollment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Morgan R Bobb; Paul G Van Heukelom; Brett A Faine; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Jeffrey T Messerly; Gregory Bell; Karisa K Harland; Christian Simon; Nicholas M Mohr
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Subject recruitment in critical care nursing research: a complex task in a complex environment.

Authors:  Mary Jo Grap; Cindy L Munro
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.210

Review 9.  Principles of recruitment and retention in clinical trials.

Authors:  Leanne Aitken; Robyn Gallagher; Christine Madronio
Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.066

10.  Factors influencing recruitment to research: qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams.

Authors:  Lisa Newington; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of deep oropharyngeal suctioning on microaspiration, ventilator events, and clinical outcomes: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mary Lou Sole; Steven Talbert; Xin Yan; Daleen Penoyer; Devendra Mehta; Melody Bennett; Kimberly Paige Emery; Aurea Middleton; Lara Deaton; Bassam Abomoelak; Chirajyoti Deb
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Cohort profile of Acutelines: a large data/biobank of acute and emergency medicine.

Authors:  Ewoud Ter Avest; Barbara C van Munster; Raymond J van Wijk; Sanne Tent; Sanne Ter Horst; Ting Ting Hu; Lisanne E van Heijst; Felien S van der Veer; Fleur E van Beuningen; Jan Cornelis Ter Maaten; Hjalmar R Bouma
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.