Literature DB >> 22115080

Assessing the impact of source-zone remediation efforts at the contaminant-plume scale through analysis of contaminant mass discharge.

M L Brusseau1, J Hatton, W DiGuiseppi.   

Abstract

The long-term impact of source-zone remediation efforts was assessed for a large site contaminated by trichloroethene. The impact of the remediation efforts (soil vapor extraction and in-situ chemical oxidation) was assessed through analysis of plume-scale contaminant mass discharge, which was measured using a high-resolution data set obtained from 23 years of operation of a large pump-and-treat system. The initial contaminant mass discharge peaked at approximately 7kg/d, and then declined to approximately 2kg/d. This latter value was sustained for several years prior to the initiation of source-zone remediation efforts. The contaminant mass discharge in 2010, measured several years after completion of the two source-zone remediation actions, was approximately 0.2kg/d, which is ten times lower than the value prior to source-zone remediation. The time-continuous contaminant mass discharge data can be used to evaluate the impact of the source-zone remediation efforts on reducing the time required to operate the pump-and-treat system, and to estimate the cost savings associated with the decreased operational period. While significant reductions have been achieved, it is evident that the remediation efforts have not completely eliminated contaminant mass discharge and associated risk. Remaining contaminant mass contributing to the current mass discharge is hypothesized to comprise poorly accessible mass in the source zones, as well as aqueous (and sorbed) mass present in the extensive lower-permeability units located within and adjacent to the contaminant plume. The fate of these sources is an issue of critical import to the remediation of chlorinated-solvent contaminated sites, and development of methods to address these sources will be required to achieve successful long-term management of such sites and to ultimately transition them to closure.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22115080      PMCID: PMC3224343          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2011.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contam Hydrol        ISSN: 0169-7722            Impact factor:   3.188


  10 in total

1.  Predicting impacts of ground water contamination.

Authors:  M D Einarson; D M Mackay
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  The effect of local-scale physical heterogeneity and nonlinear, rate-limited sorption/desorption on contaminant transport in porous media.

Authors:  G R Johnson; K Gupta; D K Putz; Q Hu; M L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.188

3.  Remediating chlorinated solvent source zones.

Authors:  Hans F Stroo; Marvin Unger; C Herb Ward; Michael C Kavanaugh; Catherine Vogel; Andrea Leeson; Jeffrey Marqusee; Bradley P Smith
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  A review of NAPL source zone remediation efficiency and the mass flux approach.

Authors:  K Soga; J W E Page; T H Illangasekare
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  Source-zone characterization of a chlorinated-solvent contaminated Superfund site in Tucson, AZ.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; N T Nelson; Z Zhang; J E Blue; J Rohrer; T Allen
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.188

6.  Relationship between mass-flux reduction and source-zone mass removal: analysis of field data.

Authors:  Erica L Difilippo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.188

7.  Impact of in situ chemical oxidation on contaminant mass discharge: linking source-zone and plume-scale characterizations of remediation performance.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; K C Carroll; T Allen; J Baker; W Diguiseppi; J Hatton; C Morrison; A Russo; J Berkompas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Analysis of a gas-phase partitioning tracer test conducted in an unsaturated fractured-clay formation.

Authors:  Michelle A Simon; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.188

9.  Controlled release, blind test of DNAPL remediation by ethanol flushing.

Authors:  Michael C Brooks; Michael D Annable; P Suresh C Rao; Kirk Hatfield; James W Jawitz; William R Wise; A Lynn Wood; Carl G Enfield
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.188

10.  Mass removal and low-concentration tailing of trichloroethene in freshly-amended, synthetically-aged, and field-contaminated aquifer material.

Authors:  G R Johnson; D K Norris; M L Brusseau
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 7.086

  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  Assessing the impact of chlorinated-solvent sites on metropolitan groundwater resources.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Matthew Narter
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Use of Historical Pump-and-Treat Data to Enhance Site Characterization and Remediation Performance Assessment.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.520

3.  The impact of well-field configuration and permeability heterogeneity on contaminant mass removal and plume persistence.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  Modeling groundwater contaminant transport in the presence of large heterogeneity: A case study comparing MT3D and RWhet.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Graham E Fogg; Mark L Brusseau; Eric M LaBolle; Jose Lopez
Journal:  Hydrogeol J       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.178

5.  Characterization and Remediation of Chlorinated Volatile Organic Contaminants in the Vadose Zone: An Overview of Issues and Approaches.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Kenneth C Carroll; Michael J Truex; David J Becker
Journal:  Vadose Zone J       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.289

6.  Persistence of a Groundwater Contaminant Plume after Hydraulic Source Containment at a Chlorinated-Solvent Contaminated Site.

Authors:  D E Matthieu; M L Brusseau; Z Guo; M Plaschke; K C Carroll; F Brinker
Journal:  Ground Water Monit Remediat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.019

7.  The Impact of Well-Field Configuration on Contaminant Mass Removal and Plume Persistence for Homogeneous versus Layered Systems.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Hydrol Process       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.565

8.  Characterizing long-term contaminant mass discharge and the relationship between reductions in discharge and reductions in mass for DNAPL source areas.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; D E Matthieu; K C Carroll; J Mainhagu; C Morrison; A McMillan; A Russo; M Plaschke
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.188

9.  Application of a Persistent Dissolved-phase Reactive Treatment Zone for Mitigation of Mass Discharge from Sources Located in Lower-Permeability Sediments.

Authors:  J C Marble; M L Brusseau; K C Carroll; M Plaschke; L Fuhrig; F Brinker
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.520

10.  Assessing contaminant-removal conditions and plume persistence through analysis of data from long-term pump-and-treat operations.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Zhilin Guo
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.188

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.