Literature DB >> 28342351

The impact of well-field configuration and permeability heterogeneity on contaminant mass removal and plume persistence.

Zhilin Guo1, Mark L Brusseau2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of well-field hydraulics and permeability heterogeneity on mass-removal efficiency for systems comprising large groundwater contaminant plumes. A three-dimensional (3D) numerical model was used to simulate the impact of different well-field configurations on pump-and-treat mass removal for heterogeneous domains. The relationship between reduction in contaminant mass discharge (CMDR) and mass removal (MR) was used as the metric to examine remediation efficiency. The impacts of well-field configuration on mass removal behavior are attributed to mass-transfer constraints related to regions of low flow associated with the well field, which can be muted by the influence of permeability heterogeneity. These impacts are reflected in the associated CMDR-MR profiles. Systems whose CDMR-MR profiles are below the 1:1 relationship line are associated with more efficient well-field configurations. The impact of domain heterogeneity on mass-removal effectiveness was investigated in terms of both variance and correlation scale of the random permeability distributions and indexed by the CMDR-MR relationship. Data collected from pump-and-treat operations conducted in a section of the Tucson International Airport Area (TIAA) federal Superfund site were used as a case study. The comparison between simulated and measured site data supports the general validity of the numerical model, and results from the case study are consistent with the conclusions of the theoretical study. These results illustrate that the CMDR-MR relationship can be an effective way to quantify the impacts of different factors on mass-removal efficiency.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back diffusion; Groundwater remediation; Mass flux; Plume; Pump and treat

Year:  2017        PMID: 28342351      PMCID: PMC5426908          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  19 in total

1.  Simple screening models of NAPL dissolution in the subsurface.

Authors:  Jianting Zhu; Jonathan F Sykes
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.188

2.  Relative contribution of DNAPL dissolution and matrix diffusion to the long-term persistence of chlorinated solvent source zones.

Authors:  Mir Ahmad Seyedabbasi; Charles J Newell; David T Adamson; Thomas C Sale
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.188

3.  Source-zone characterization of a chlorinated-solvent contaminated Superfund site in Tucson, AZ.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; N T Nelson; Z Zhang; J E Blue; J Rohrer; T Allen
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.188

4.  Mass-removal and mass-flux-reduction behavior for idealized source zones with hydraulically poorly-accessible immiscible liquid.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; E L Difilippo; J C Marble; M Oostrom
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Laboratory investigation of flux reduction from dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) partial source zone remediation by enhanced dissolution.

Authors:  Andrew J Kaye; Jaehyun Cho; Nandita B Basu; Xiaosong Chen; Michael D Annable; James W Jawitz
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.188

6.  Impact of organic-liquid distribution and flow-field heterogeneity on reductions in mass flux.

Authors:  Erica L DiFilippo; Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.188

7.  Role of back diffusion and biodegradation reactions in sustaining an MTBE/TBA plume in alluvial media.

Authors:  Ehsan Rasa; Steven W Chapman; Barbara A Bekins; Graham E Fogg; Kate M Scow; Douglas M Mackay
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.188

8.  Pump-and-treat remediation of chlorinated solvent contamination at a controlled field-experiment site.

Authors:  Michael O Rivett; Steven W Chapman; Richelle M Allen-King; Stanley Feenstra; John A Cherry
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Characterizing long-term contaminant mass discharge and the relationship between reductions in discharge and reductions in mass for DNAPL source areas.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; D E Matthieu; K C Carroll; J Mainhagu; C Morrison; A McMillan; A Russo; M Plaschke
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.188

10.  Matrix diffusion effects in the cleanup of heterogeneous aquifers.

Authors:  D J Wilson; R D Mutch; J I Scott
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.513

View more
  2 in total

1.  Modeling groundwater contaminant transport in the presence of large heterogeneity: A case study comparing MT3D and RWhet.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Graham E Fogg; Mark L Brusseau; Eric M LaBolle; Jose Lopez
Journal:  Hydrogeol J       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.178

2.  The Impact of Well-Field Configuration on Contaminant Mass Removal and Plume Persistence for Homogeneous versus Layered Systems.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Hydrol Process       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.565

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.