Literature DB >> 29755199

The Impact of Well-Field Configuration on Contaminant Mass Removal and Plume Persistence for Homogeneous versus Layered Systems.

Zhilin Guo1, Mark L Brusseau2.   

Abstract

A three-dimensional numerical model was used to simulate the impact of different well-field configurations on pump-and-treat mass removal efficiency for large groundwater contaminant plumes residing in homogeneous and layered domains. Four well-field configurations were tested, Longitudinal, Distributed, Downgradient, and natural gradient (with no extraction wells). The reductions in contaminant mass discharge (CMDR) as a function of mass removal (MR) were characterized to assess remediation efficiency. Systems whose CDMR-MR profiles are below the 1:1 relationship curve are associated with more efficient well-field configurations. For simulations conducted with the homogeneous domain, the CMDR-MR curves shift leftward, from convex-downward profiles for natural gradient and Longitudinal to first-order behaviour for Distributed, and further leftward to a sigmoidal profile for the Downgradient well-field configuration. These results reveal the maximum potential impacts of well-field configuration on mass-removal behaviour, which is attributed to mass-transfer constraints associated with regions of low flow. In contrast, for the simulations conducted with the layered domain, the CMDR-MR relationships for the different well-field configurations exhibit convex-upward profiles. The nonideal mass-removal behaviour in this case is influenced by both well-field configuration and back diffusion associated with low-permeability units.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Groundwater contaminant plume; back diffusion; mass flux; plume persistence; pump and treat

Year:  2017        PMID: 29755199      PMCID: PMC5944865          DOI: 10.1002/hyp.11393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hydrol Process        ISSN: 0885-6087            Impact factor:   3.565


  20 in total

1.  Testing high resolution numerical models for analysis of contaminant storage and release from low permeability zones.

Authors:  Steven W Chapman; Beth L Parker; Tom C Sale; Lee Ann Doner
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.188

2.  Relative contribution of DNAPL dissolution and matrix diffusion to the long-term persistence of chlorinated solvent source zones.

Authors:  Mir Ahmad Seyedabbasi; Charles J Newell; David T Adamson; Thomas C Sale
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.188

3.  Source-zone characterization of a chlorinated-solvent contaminated Superfund site in Tucson, AZ.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; N T Nelson; Z Zhang; J E Blue; J Rohrer; T Allen
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.188

4.  Mass-removal and mass-flux-reduction behavior for idealized source zones with hydraulically poorly-accessible immiscible liquid.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; E L Difilippo; J C Marble; M Oostrom
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Laboratory investigation of flux reduction from dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) partial source zone remediation by enhanced dissolution.

Authors:  Andrew J Kaye; Jaehyun Cho; Nandita B Basu; Xiaosong Chen; Michael D Annable; James W Jawitz
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.188

6.  Impact of organic-liquid distribution and flow-field heterogeneity on reductions in mass flux.

Authors:  Erica L DiFilippo; Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.188

7.  Role of back diffusion and biodegradation reactions in sustaining an MTBE/TBA plume in alluvial media.

Authors:  Ehsan Rasa; Steven W Chapman; Barbara A Bekins; Graham E Fogg; Kate M Scow; Douglas M Mackay
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.188

8.  Pump-and-treat remediation of chlorinated solvent contamination at a controlled field-experiment site.

Authors:  Michael O Rivett; Steven W Chapman; Richelle M Allen-King; Stanley Feenstra; John A Cherry
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Characterizing long-term contaminant mass discharge and the relationship between reductions in discharge and reductions in mass for DNAPL source areas.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; D E Matthieu; K C Carroll; J Mainhagu; C Morrison; A McMillan; A Russo; M Plaschke
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.188

10.  Matrix diffusion effects in the cleanup of heterogeneous aquifers.

Authors:  D J Wilson; R D Mutch; J I Scott
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.