Literature DB >> 18407371

Relationship between mass-flux reduction and source-zone mass removal: analysis of field data.

Erica L Difilippo1, Mark L Brusseau.   

Abstract

The magnitude of contaminant mass-flux reduction associated with a specific amount of contaminant mass removed is a key consideration for evaluating the effectiveness of a source-zone remediation effort. Thus, there is great interest in characterizing, estimating, and predicting relationships between mass-flux reduction and mass removal. Published data collected for several field studies were examined to evaluate relationships between mass-flux reduction and source-zone mass removal. The studies analyzed herein represent a variety of source-zone architectures, immiscible-liquid compositions, and implemented remediation technologies. There are two general approaches to characterizing the mass-flux-reduction/mass-removal relationship, end-point analysis and time-continuous analysis. End-point analysis, based on comparing masses and mass fluxes measured before and after a source-zone remediation effort, was conducted for 21 remediation projects. Mass removals were greater than 60% for all but three of the studies. Mass-flux reductions ranging from slightly less than to slightly greater than one-to-one were observed for the majority of the sites. However, these single-snapshot characterizations are limited in that the antecedent behavior is indeterminate. Time-continuous analysis, based on continuous monitoring of mass removal and mass flux, was performed for two sites, both for which data were obtained under water-flushing conditions. The reductions in mass flux were significantly different for the two sites (90% vs. approximately 8%) for similar mass removals ( approximately 40%). These results illustrate the dependence of the mass-flux-reduction/mass-removal relationship on source-zone architecture and associated mass-transfer processes. Minimal mass-flux reduction was observed for a system wherein mass removal was relatively efficient (ideal mass-transfer and displacement). Conversely, a significant degree of mass-flux reduction was observed for a site wherein mass removal was inefficient (non-ideal mass-transfer and displacement). The mass-flux-reduction/mass-removal relationship for the latter site exhibited a multi-step behavior, which cannot be predicted using some of the available simple estimation functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18407371      PMCID: PMC3029099          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contam Hydrol        ISSN: 0169-7722            Impact factor:   3.188


  17 in total

1.  Performance assessment of NAPL remediation in heterogeneous alluvium.

Authors:  H W Meinardus; V Dwarakanath; J Ewing; G J Hirasaki; R E Jackson; M Jin; J S Ginn; J T Londergan; C A Miller; G A Pope
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.188

2.  Remediating chlorinated solvent source zones.

Authors:  Hans F Stroo; Marvin Unger; C Herb Ward; Michael C Kavanaugh; Catherine Vogel; Andrea Leeson; Jeffrey Marqusee; Bradley P Smith
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  A review of NAPL source zone remediation efficiency and the mass flux approach.

Authors:  K Soga; J W E Page; T H Illangasekare
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  Simple screening models of NAPL dissolution in the subsurface.

Authors:  Jianting Zhu; Jonathan F Sykes
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.188

5.  Dissolution of an emplaced source of DNAPL in a natural aquifer setting.

Authors:  Michael O Rivett; Stanley Feenstra
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Assessing the impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones I. Analytical modeling of source strength functions and plume response.

Authors:  Ronald W Falta; P Suresh Rao; Nandita Basu
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.188

7.  Controlled release, blind tests of DNAPL characterization using partitioning tracers.

Authors:  Michael C Brooks; Michael D Annable; P Suresh C Rao; Kirk Hatfield; James W Jawitz; William R Wise; A Lynn Wood; Carl G Enfield
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.188

8.  Dissolution of nonuniformly distributed immiscible liquid: intermediate-scale experiments and mathematical modeling.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Zhihui Zhang; Nicole T Nelson; R Brent Cain; Geoffrey R Tick; Mart Oostrom
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Reductions in contaminant mass discharge following partial mass removal from DNAPL source zones.

Authors:  Eric J Suchomel; Kurt D Pennell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Field demonstration of DNAPL dehalogenation using emulsified zero-valent iron.

Authors:  Jacqueline Quinn; Cherie Geiger; Chris Clausen; Kathleen Brooks; Christina Coon; Suzanne O'Hara; Thomas Krug; David Major; Woong-Sang Yoon; Arun Gavaskar; Thomas Holdsworth
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  15 in total

1.  Impact of enhanced-flushing reagents and organic-liquid distribution on mass removal and mass-discharge reduction.

Authors:  Nihat Hakan Akyol; Ann Russo Lee; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.520

2.  Source strength functions from long-term monitoring data and spatially distributed mass discharge measurements.

Authors:  Michael C Brooks; A Lynn Wood; Jaehyun Cho; Christine A P Williams; William Brandon; Michael D Annable
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.188

3.  Impact of organic-liquid distribution and flow-field heterogeneity on reductions in mass flux.

Authors:  Erica L DiFilippo; Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.188

4.  Use of Historical Pump-and-Treat Data to Enhance Site Characterization and Remediation Performance Assessment.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  The impact of well-field configuration and permeability heterogeneity on contaminant mass removal and plume persistence.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 10.588

6.  Impact of in situ chemical oxidation on contaminant mass discharge: linking source-zone and plume-scale characterizations of remediation performance.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; K C Carroll; T Allen; J Baker; W Diguiseppi; J Hatton; C Morrison; A Russo; J Berkompas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  In situ oxidation and associated mass-flux-reduction/mass-removal behavior for systems with organic liquid located in lower-permeability sediments.

Authors:  Justin C Marble; Kenneth C Carroll; Hilary Janousek; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.188

8.  Dissolution, cyclodextrin-enhanced solubilization, and mass removal of an ideal multicomponent organic liquid.

Authors:  Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 3.188

9.  The Impact of Well-Field Configuration on Contaminant Mass Removal and Plume Persistence for Homogeneous versus Layered Systems.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Hydrol Process       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.565

10.  Characterizing long-term contaminant mass discharge and the relationship between reductions in discharge and reductions in mass for DNAPL source areas.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; D E Matthieu; K C Carroll; J Mainhagu; C Morrison; A McMillan; A Russo; M Plaschke
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.188

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.